E63 AMG BiTurbo Crushes the 1/4 Mile
12-30-2016, 12:38 PM
#151
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
The following users liked this post:
Amg63- (12-30-2016)
12-30-2016, 12:49 PM
#152
MBWorld Fanatic!
it'll smoke your M5 , CLS , E from 60 roll bad .
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
I'm guessing you will need drag radials or R888 on the car all the time to handle such power on the streets.
12-30-2016, 02:52 PM
#153
It's not finally , I had a few nice fast cars , MB their biggest fail .
12-31-2016, 12:14 PM
#154
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,625
Received 1,988 Likes
on
1,392 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
I don't mind the conversations about rwd vs awd, I've learned a lot from everyone
cheers amg63- and happy new year bro
cheers amg63- and happy new year bro
12-31-2016, 06:53 PM
#155
MBWorld Fanatic!
Happy New Years to you and your family, my best wishes to you all.
12-31-2016, 10:01 PM
#156
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,625
Received 1,988 Likes
on
1,392 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
thank you bro, I always enjoy your posts, happy New Years to you and yours and be safe!
01-01-2017, 12:58 AM
#157
Super Member
it'll smoke your M5 , CLS , E from 60 roll bad .
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
if to be more specific
1 I have a car not on the lift for year
2 fun
3 potential
4 cheap parts compare to benz after market parts
5 I placed my order for 750 rwhp pack yesterday I'll see it in 3 days
the only down side is tires and interior it's sucks , but when you flooring it you don't car
Who you dealing with for mods/tuning?
01-01-2017, 04:41 AM
#158
Why does it matter if we race 100 times and i win 100 out of 100. It doesnt!!!!!
You are just over analyzing this. go sit in the corner.
01-01-2017, 05:29 AM
#159
Member
Do you think its enough of a difference to make it .5-.8S faster from 100km-200km/k or trap any higher in the 1/4 mile?
Also, wouldn't the lighter weight of the E63 be a greater benefit at higher speed than less frontal area?
I read its something like 200 lbs. lighter, that's ALOT.
Also, wouldn't the lighter weight of the E63 be a greater benefit at higher speed than less frontal area?
I read its something like 200 lbs. lighter, that's ALOT.
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
Last edited by Pumpkinate; 01-01-2017 at 05:38 AM.
01-01-2017, 12:30 PM
#160
MBWorld Fanatic!
Actually, I am thinking it could make the difference. Consider this:
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
Do you know the weight difference?
i thought the weight difference was significant, and that the E having that would offset the CLS drag advanage.
01-01-2017, 03:55 PM
#161
MBWorld Fanatic!
Actually, I am thinking it could make the difference. Consider this:
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
height of 2014 E63 56.8"
height of 2014 CLS63 55"
Drag is proportional to velocity squared
So at higher speeds the drag force increases substantially. I don't know what the actual frontal cross sectional areas are for the two models but put side to side the CLS looks more slippery. If you have enough gears what determines your top speed...... the balance between motive force and drag (plus a bit of rolling friction etc)
01-01-2017, 06:16 PM
#162
Member
It may have a small advantage in drag coefficient but that doesn't prove it has less drag. Drag force is proportional to both drag coefficient and frontal area. The CLS appears to have less frontal area...
01-01-2017, 11:56 PM
#163
MBWorld Fanatic!
what about the weight difference. Doesn't that also play a big role?
