w213 e63s vs 2017 M6 acceleration
06-26-2017, 11:30 AM
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
w213 e63s vs 2017 M6 acceleration
nice little side by side speedo compare... e63s is significantly quicker and the launch vid looks like it get out of the hole pretty good
06-26-2017, 12:39 PM
#2
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,986
Received 2,144 Likes
on
1,502 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Waiting for notatroll in 5....4.....3....
but the 2019 m5 will smoke this 2017 w213 amg.... just you wait (sarcasm implied)
but the 2019 m5 will smoke this 2017 w213 amg.... just you wait (sarcasm implied)
Last edited by PeterUbers; 06-26-2017 at 04:03 PM.
06-26-2017, 04:05 PM
#4
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,986
Received 2,144 Likes
on
1,502 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
my comment wasn't fair ... "notatroll" is a gal that comes on here that keeps claiming future generations of bmw m5/6 with AWD will smoke the w213 e63S.... based on no actual data
06-26-2017, 06:16 PM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Man I think a tuned dp w212 and stock w213 might actually be a close race
06-29-2017, 11:03 AM
#7
Super Member
I wish the M had a vbox in it like the E for actual comparison because in the E, the speedo is reading between 10 and 20 kph faster than the vbox gps unit, more so till 120, then it gets to within 10 kph. Man that new E pulls hard.
Pause it at 2.09,, dash shows 140, gps shows 117???
Pause it at 2.09,, dash shows 140, gps shows 117???
Last edited by RobbieRob; 06-29-2017 at 11:06 AM.
Trending Topics
06-30-2017, 12:07 PM
#8
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
I wish the M had a vbox in it like the E for actual comparison because in the E, the speedo is reading between 10 and 20 kph faster than the vbox gps unit, more so till 120, then it gets to within 10 kph. Man that new E pulls hard.
Pause it at 2.09,, dash shows 140, gps shows 117???
Pause it at 2.09,, dash shows 140, gps shows 117???
Having owned 3 S63tu engines (2 M5's and an M6) Ill say that they suck out of the hole but are very formidable from a roll and make great usable hp once the car is moving and the DCT is more efficient.
I have no doubt that the new E is a force as my lowly tuned C63S and tuned GTS are *** kickers
06-30-2017, 12:33 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
we cant really rely on youtube frame rates vs speedo vsiphone gps based speedo that is refreshing in ~17 kph increments
at the start of 2:09 frame the diff is around 127 kph speedo vs 117 kph iphonegps so diff of 10 kph or 6mph
at start of 2:10 frame the diff is around 141 kph speedo vs 134 kph iphone gpsso diff of 7 kph or 4 mph
06-30-2017, 12:35 PM
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: miami / delray beach
Posts: 2,841
Received 202 Likes
on
155 Posts
2014 E63s amg 4matic, 2009 C63, 2006 E55 AMG , 2001.5 AUDI S4 stg 3+ w/meth
^ ps this new format/refresh of the site sucks.... it wouldn't let me post the pics using firefox, so I had to use IE and then it wouldn't let me insert the pics where I wanted them, it just put them all at the top no matter what
06-30-2017, 04:15 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,652
Received 569 Likes
on
392 Posts
2018 E63S AMG
I would expect a bit of lag from the GPS referenced speed indicator based on the car's own telemetry.
The GPS receiver has to update itself based on the calculated location at time 1 versus the calculated location at time 2 and the distance moved over the time interval.
Given that GPS receivers need to make several location samples and average to get the location within a few meters it isn't surprising that the device is lagging a little.
If the car holds a constant speed in a straight line for several seconds, I'd expect the GPS to settle down and read fairly close to the car.
Another thing that affects GPS is how many satellites are in view at a given time. Fewer satellites will result in a less accurate location calculation and more jitter between successive measurements.
The GPS receiver has to update itself based on the calculated location at time 1 versus the calculated location at time 2 and the distance moved over the time interval.
Given that GPS receivers need to make several location samples and average to get the location within a few meters it isn't surprising that the device is lagging a little.
If the car holds a constant speed in a straight line for several seconds, I'd expect the GPS to settle down and read fairly close to the car.
Another thing that affects GPS is how many satellites are in view at a given time. Fewer satellites will result in a less accurate location calculation and more jitter between successive measurements.
