900hp DME/Pureturbo only runs 10.8
I’m just laughing at how tuners claim their cars have useless amount of Hp and cars are literally “dead”.
Last edited by dav461; Aug 4, 2018 at 04:46 PM.
The tuning on this platform and most of the newer MB/AMG cars hasn’t been as good as it used to be - whether it’s lack of focus on these cars, not enough resources, limited hardware, or not being able to handle the security parameters around tuning.
I, too, have been AMG loyal, but I realized I’m a car enthusiast first, so I will go wherever the enthusiasm (tuning capability) is greater.





The tuning on this platform and most of the newer MB/AMG cars hasn’t been as good as it used to be - whether it’s lack of focus on these cars, not enough resources, limited hardware, or not being able to handle the security parameters around tuning.
I, too, have been AMG loyal, but I realized I’m a car enthusiast first, so I will go wherever the enthusiasm (tuning capability) is greater.

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
- lowered its 60ft from 1.90s to 1.62s
- lowered the 0-60mph from 3.2s to 2.85s
- lowered the 1/8 mile from 7.25s to 6.92s
- I don't yet have decent 1/4 mile before and after data since the (private.. lol) road I used is too short and requires I brake too early. That said, it was lowered from 11.36s to 10.9s
- that figure, however, isn't representative of the car + EC tune on a track...
Last edited by limeypride; Aug 5, 2018 at 03:07 PM.
- lowered its 60ft from 1.90s to 1.62s
- lowered the 0-60mph from 3.2s to 2.85s
- lowered the 1/8 mile from 7.25s to 6.92s
- I don't yet have decent 1/4 mile before and after data since the (private.. lol) road I used is too short and requires I brake too early. That said, it was lowered from 11.36s to 10.9s
- that figure, however, isn't representative of the car + EC tune on a track...
- lowered its 60ft from 1.90s to 1.62s
- lowered the 0-60mph from 3.2s to 2.85s
- lowered the 1/8 mile from 7.25s to 6.92s
- I don't yet have decent 1/4 mile before and after data since the (private.. lol) road I used is too short and requires I brake too early. That said, it was lowered from 11.36s to 10.9s
- that figure, however, isn't representative of the car + EC tune on a track...
I certainly would prefer local people who do custom but I’m not 100% against remote, out of box tuning.
Il’ll have a look at your tuning option that you took.
Thanks
Thanks, that’s actually been really helpful!
Give it a shot, if your end result is anything like mine, you'll be smiling big.
- I don't yet have decent 1/4 mile before and after data since the (private.. lol) road I used is too short and requires I brake too early. That said, it was lowered from 11.36s to 10.9s
- that figure, however, isn't representative of the car + EC tune on a track...
corrections are not made on dyno, as car is not always driven there. It’s better to make it on road by looking at logs ( boost, timings, temps and etc on 3/4/5 gears) through any good software that collects logs.
You can do it yourself, and then send file to EC together with your ecu for further adjustments.
btw, limey what month and year of production is your car, do you have sunroof? Do you remember if your dealer has updated any software in your car after EC did ecu remap?
Last edited by dav461; Aug 6, 2018 at 05:24 AM.




Limey, your dragy graph shows constant speed acceleration without any early breaks 🤔
corrections are not made on dyno, as car is not always driven there. It’s better to make it on road by looking at logs ( boost, timings, temps and etc on 3/4/5 gears) through any good software that collects logs.
You can do it yourself, and then send file to EC together with your ecu for further adjustments.
btw, limey what month and year of production is your car, do you have sunroof? Do you remember if your dealer has updated any software in your car after EC did ecu remap?
I reviewed the 1/4 graph and the best I can say is I know for sure that I let up early due to impending death, somewhere just before the 1000ft mark I'd guess.
Corrections are most definitely made on the dyno--sure, that's not perfect but it's a very commonplace practice depending on tune vendor. In contrast, Burger products tend to bias logs for customer cars but even they use dynos to measure subtle changes.
No ECU updates post-tune. I'm not sure on the build date--I'll check later.
The horsepower level is grossly exaggerated. The false advertising is a big problem on our platform.
One thing for the owner would be to try higher octane fuel, see if there is some power that was left on the table.
Last edited by kcjonz; Aug 7, 2018 at 12:29 AM.
Also as far as I know, these new ECUs have atleast 3 separate torque limiters which is calculated from the manifold airflow. If they are not adjusted properly the throttle might close or boost will drop in higher gears depending on the which limiter was not adjusted properly.
Was the tranny reinforced for this car? A TCU update would go far with this car too. In the new generations of MB, it is the tranny that is the bottle neck.
Last edited by munis; Aug 7, 2018 at 09:26 AM.
you are absolutely right. tuners can’t offer good remap yet. What I have heard from GAD is that damos files are still blocked, tuners have to do all adjustments in “blind” mode and room for it very limited. While M5 f90 goes 10.37 on piggy back box with upper decatted pipes, stage3 E63 can’t get mid 10s. I think they need time to find a solution for it. For now, it’s definitely waste of money (stage2 onwards)




