H&R or Eibach for CLK320 Cab
02-04-2003, 06:57 AM
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MB CLK320
H&R or Eibach for CLK320 Cab
(1) Which is better? I mean more durable, comfortable and better for attacking the corner?
H&R or Eibach?
(2) also is Eibach/Bilstein a defacto std for lowering CLK?
(3) do i need Bilstein or just use the original absorbers?
Thanks a lot!!
H&R or Eibach?
(2) also is Eibach/Bilstein a defacto std for lowering CLK?
(3) do i need Bilstein or just use the original absorbers?
Thanks a lot!!
02-04-2003, 08:37 AM
#2
TR Moderator & Tire God
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SouthBend, IN USA
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
depends on the weather
Eibach's tend to offer better rid quality than the H&R. While the H&R's lower the car more. You can use your OE shocks but they will wear out faster than normal because of the higher spring rates
