Tires for W211 E55?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
Tires for W211 E55?
It's time for new tires for my stock wheeled 2003 W211 E55. I've read though what I could find, but still am not sure which tires to get. Does anyone have a recommendation? I live in Southern California. Handling, comfort, noise (in that order) are my criteria.
Also, I'm not sure if I can put on wider back tires, and if I do, what do I give up? I assume AMG put the size that come stock for a reason...?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Also, I'm not sure if I can put on wider back tires, and if I do, what do I give up? I assume AMG put the size that come stock for a reason...?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
#2
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 BMW M5
Look into Michelin Pilot Sport 2 and Bridgestone Pole Position S03s. The Bridgestones are some of the best value on the market right now for tires as they offer on of the best dry/wet grip while remaining reasonably priced. They also tend to run a little wider then similiar sized tires. The Michelin is new and expensive, but I have heard great things about it. Hope this helps.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'07 Porsche 997TT
I've used both the SO-3's and the PS 2's. You're right, the SO-3 come in 275/35 for the rear, and are not a heavy load tire that MB recommends. Tirerack said I could use them (they were on my E500) but like you, I figured MB did it for a reason. Tirerack mentioned that the ESP light may come on more often? I still have mine. There's approx. 2,000 miles on them. If you're interested send me an e-mail. Regarding the tires, both are awesome. Like others said the PS'2's are more expensive. I think they are very close in wet/dry traction but the PS2's win in the noise/comfort category. IMHO.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OC
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 E55
front tire size
I am about to order the PS2 for my E55. I have the BFG's in the back and Stock tire up front. I am running stock rims. What size front is the best to get? Stock size or larger?
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PS2's were engineered for the more stringent noise laws in europe, and supposedly have traded-off some loss of performance vs the last generation of PS, which weren't even as sticky as the old MXX3's.
#7
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Birmingham MI
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55/BMW X54.4/Porsche 914-6 2.8
I had Bridgestone SO 3 on my BMW 540i and wore them to the wear bars in 5,000 miles. I realize I drive a car hard but 5,000 miles is silly. Plus, they "track" in the grooved roads like crazy. Only tires I ever owned that demanded both hands on the steering wheel. Honestly, I wouldn't put them on again if I was offered a free set.
Trending Topics
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 E55 k2; Ford GT
I have the PS2 245 upfront and 275 in back. Great tires, much better traction and handling than Contis. It takes a hundred miles or so to get them to start sticking. Those sizes will fit and I recommend them.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 E55 k2; Ford GT
None and the tires are extra load rated which is important. When I have to replace, I may try the 255s in the front to give some added cushion over bumps that may dent the rims.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes
on
41 Posts
E 63S Wagon Renntech, E55 Renntech, SL65, SL 55 030, ML, bunch of old ones--they come, they go...
Experience, with several recent MB's:
1.Buy the PS 2.
2.Buy the PS 2
3 Buy the PS 2.
The SO 3 is an excellent tire, but just doesnt seem to operate in harmony with the MB suspension setups, stock or otherwise, as well as the Michelin. Just my .02, but I've sure spent a lot more than that finding out.
2.Buy the PS 2
3 Buy the PS 2.
The SO 3 is an excellent tire, but just doesnt seem to operate in harmony with the MB suspension setups, stock or otherwise, as well as the Michelin. Just my .02, but I've sure spent a lot more than that finding out.
#16
Originally Posted by Jay_Bo
Thanks for the advice. I just ordered the PS2s.
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
Where did you order the tires, please?
Thank you very much
Fury
#17
Hey Jay_Bo,
I am also in Orange County and need to start looking for replacement tires for the rear. Please let me know if the 275/35 fit and please let me know if there is any problems running that size for the rear. Haven't decided which tires to go with yet, so your input would be valuable.
Thanks
amgB
I am also in Orange County and need to start looking for replacement tires for the rear. Please let me know if the 275/35 fit and please let me know if there is any problems running that size for the rear. Haven't decided which tires to go with yet, so your input would be valuable.
Thanks
amgB
Originally Posted by Jay_Bo
Thanks for the advice. I just ordered the PS2s.
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E55, F550, S600 Ducati 999
Originally Posted by eclou
PS2's were engineered for the more stringent noise laws in europe, and supposedly have traded-off some loss of performance vs the last generation of PS, which weren't even as sticky as the old MXX3's.
I don't know where you heard that from, but Michelin themselves quote improvement in lap times of 2sec in testing between the new and old. The new tyre is significantly better in both wet and dry and rated above the S03 in all the independant testing I have seen, with the bonus of significantly lower noise levels than the Dunlop.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
1989 Toyota Tercel EZ - dyno'd @ 70whp/77wtq
I'm satisfied w/ S03 and my car is on its 2nd set S03..... finished rear ones in about 12K and front ones in about 18K.... I haven't tried PS2 but I definitely like S03 better than original Michelin PS. They feel stickier, less noisy and last a bit longer
#20
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
I've had the PS2 on for about 250 miles now. They took about 100 miles to break in, but the difference between the PS2 and the Continentals is significant.
If I would have known how well these tires perform I would have replaced the stock tires with the PS2 the day I purchased the car.
These Sizes Fit without any problems.
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
If I would have known how well these tires perform I would have replaced the stock tires with the PS2 the day I purchased the car.
These Sizes Fit without any problems.
245/40 - Front
275/35 - Rear
#22
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 E55 AMG
245/40ZR-18 -- $240
275/35ZR-18 -- $280
America's Tire Co in Mission Viejo (its around the corner from my house)
I think I could have saved a little with tirerack.com since I wouldn't have paid tax, but it wasn't worth the hastle to me.
275/35ZR-18 -- $280
America's Tire Co in Mission Viejo (its around the corner from my house)
I think I could have saved a little with tirerack.com since I wouldn't have paid tax, but it wasn't worth the hastle to me.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stephens
eclou
I don't know where you heard that from, but Michelin themselves quote improvement in lap times of 2sec in testing between the new and old. The new tyre is significantly better in both wet and dry and rated above the S03 in all the independant testing I have seen, with the bonus of significantly lower noise levels than the Dunlop.
I don't know where you heard that from, but Michelin themselves quote improvement in lap times of 2sec in testing between the new and old. The new tyre is significantly better in both wet and dry and rated above the S03 in all the independant testing I have seen, with the bonus of significantly lower noise levels than the Dunlop.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
I too have driven on both PS2s and SO3s. Frankly, I like the PS2s better cause they are not as noisy as the SO3s. Additonally, I seem to experience more tire spin with the SO3s. Another tire you may want to consider is the Dunlop Sport 9000. Just my $.02.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,551
Received 1,069 Likes
on
857 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Here's a review of the PSII's, SO3's, F1 GS-D3's, & RS-A's:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/mi_ps2_nextGen.jsp
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/mi_ps2_nextGen.jsp