E46 M3 vs SLK 55

- beautiful ladies
- beautiful cars
Please share!
I DIDN'T KNOW IT WAS POSSIBLE TO DO A ****ING DIFF MOD, HENCE ME NOT ASKING. I told M&M to come make sure ALL OF THE INFO I POSTED WAS CORRECT. Which he did. What part of this isn't sinking in.
I asked if it was chipped, cammed, nawsed, headered etc etc. You guys need to relax. WHOOSAAAH. Also, we didn't go there with the aim of filming an M3 vs SLK race. It was to film M3 vs Subaru races, with the SLK as the camera car. WHICH I'VE ALSO SAID LIKE 3 TIMES. But you crunts choose to ignore. I even pasted the ****ing links to the Subaru club website.
Also, Improwimp WHERE ARE THE COPIES OF THE VID AND THE PHONECALL RECORDINGS. Coward.
Claiming M&M makes your assets depreciate
That's the funniest **** I've ever heard. Why aren't you suing Jeremy Clarkson? He often portrays cars in bad light, especially Benzes' technology like the voice control. He purposefully makes it look bad. JEREMY CLARKSON MAKES YOUR CAR DEPRECIATE.
I just had a good think about it. You are disturbed
Teh Intarweb has infested your last few braincells! Oh noes!
Last edited by SoulBladeZA; Jul 24, 2006 at 06:18 PM.
Again with the C AMG VS M3 you are not going to pull a bus length unless the M3 driver gave up... You can find the videos of the C55 vs M3 racing from 0-125 and doing rolling starts and at most the C55 barley walked away for the M3 and at 125mph the C55 was no more than 5-6 feet ahead of the M3. I still dont get it you go to the M3 forum and they all beat C55's come here and its the opposite.
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...3f494ed92a.htm
Found a nice video for you guys to show you where the M3 shines.... And what can happen with a car that has a lot of HP it can lose in a short drag race. Note the SL 55 tires where spinning a lot at the start.
Last edited by AndrewAZ; Jul 24, 2006 at 07:21 PM.
Btw, here is a nice video of a bone stock Honda beating a Corvette at a drag strip. You can believe that the car is bone stock becuase I posted it on the Internet.
And if you analyze the video and make any observations about any modifications done to the Honda, well, you're just a nonbeliever who cannot be trusted. Welcome to the cult.
POES!
And this is a fair race to you and soulbmwslut.
Hey, next time why not run with the SLK's parking brake on? Or better still, with a nice parachute slung off the back?
The lack of objectivity and the staging of this video gets more obvious with each and every passing post. Kudos to you, boys....
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Btw, here is a nice video of a bone stock Honda beating a Corvette at a drag strip. You can believe that the car is bone stock becuase I posted it on the Internet.
And if you analyze the video and make any observations about any modifications done to the Honda, well, you're just a nonbeliever who cannot be trusted. Welcome to the cult.

Hey guys, I'm the driver of the M3. You guys are correct, it is not stock. Howver, power-wise it is. It makes the same power as other stock M3's on the dyno. We have quite a few guys online here that can vouch for that as I have been to a few dyno days.
And you did it not once, but twice:
Unfortunately for you, you're stupid, and spent time chatting UP the effect the mods had upon your car's performance at the bimmer forum:
Ok so I have over 20 runs recorded on the VBox at a private testing facility. After installing the 4.1 diff, I went back there. I record EVERYTHING whenever I do a run. Things like:
- Ambient temperature
- Barometric pressure
- Humidity
- Type of fuel
- Amount of fuel in the tank
- Tyres
- RPM at launch & type of launch
So I called up a run from with the stock diff under similar conditions. Here are the results.
(m&m posts a bunch of graphs of his vbox runs posted detailing how the rear diff made his car faster)
Well this is the most important one as it shows who will actually win in a race. In this particular race the stock car had better traction & was ahead initially. At around 3.5 seconds the cars are level. But from then on the 4.1 car slowly puts distance on the stock car & after 15.38 seconds it is 8m ahead, which is 2 carlengths.
On the 1/4 mile times, the 4.1 car was 0.2 faster & 1.4 mph faster depsite having a slightly poorer 60ft time.
Between 11 and 15 seconds.

Yes, I can see that...those mods to that tuner-unfriendly, difficult-to-mod M3 that picked you up two carlengths were totally negligible, and there was certainly no attempt by you to obfuscate or misrepresent.
Last edited by Improviz; Jul 24, 2006 at 09:31 PM.
In one of the videos, the camera is mounted in the rear of the car, and you can clearly see that the seat is gone.
Perhaps you might be so kind to point out where the front seat is in the following stills taken from Rutter's video, and also point out in what model year the wheels mounted on this car came from the factory on BMW M3s while you're at it:




So, there you go, sweetie: FOUR photos from different angles, ALL showing that the front seat is missing. Suck on that, beeyutch. That car was modified, NOT STOCK.
Yeah, that must have been really frustrating for Ace Number One Crack SLK55 Pilot soulbmwslut; makes it much harder to stage a video when the stupid car actually selects the proper gear for you!!!
He said that anyone could drive an SLK55, but he sure managed to botch it!!!
Busted again....the nice thing about you and your butt-buddy soulbmwslut is that both of you are a lot more stupid than the people whom you are trying to collectively fool.
Last edited by Improviz; Jul 24, 2006 at 10:03 PM.
In one of the videos, the camera is mounted in the rear of the car, and you can clearly see that the seat is gone.
Perhaps you might be so kind to point out where the front seat is in the following stills taken from Rutter's video, and also point out in what model year the wheels mounted on this car came from the factory on BMW M3s while you're at it:




So, there you go, sweetie: FOUR photos from different angles, ALL showing that the front seat is missing. Suck on that, beeyutch. That car was modified, NOT STOCK.
Yes in the last few pictures you can see the 2 headrest of the back seat. My guess is he had the front seat way back since he had the camera on the back seats facing the shifter and him. If you go watch his in car runs when he does the high 12's you can see the side of the front seat and the camera during the incar is behind him.
Get some glasses and you can see the 2 headrests. I will no deny he has after-market rims but that isnt going to help much maybe .000001 seconds in a 1/4 mile. But still he ran a 12.7 most M3 drivers get lower 13's. Lee could launch his car at 5,500 RPM and power-shift a skill which 99% of M owners can not do. If you look at his trap speed it is not much higher than a normal M3 which indicates that he gains his time in the launch and lower end and also shifting.
Last edited by AndrewAZ; Jul 24, 2006 at 10:16 PM.









Boy, I'll tell ya....he sure has that thing shoved back pretty far...so far, in fact, that in thirteen photos now, from both sides of the car and multiple angles, it is invisible!! Man, he's pretty good with the seat-shoving, I'll give him that.
Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? It's true...look it up!!
Last edited by Improviz; Jul 24, 2006 at 11:39 PM.









Boy, I'll tell ya....he sure has that thing shoved back pretty far...so far, in fact, that in thirteen photos now, from both sides of the car and multiple angles, it is invisible!! Man, he's pretty good with the seat-shoving, I'll give him that.
Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? It's true...look it up!!
No, it indicates that he had drag radials, which is why he can get a 1.7 second 60' time in an M3.

In the last few pics I can see the back 2 headrests. When looking at the car at a 90 degree angle you can not see the back 2 headrest on any M3.. And plus I still stick to my he had the front seat down so the camera mounted in the back of the car could see the driver.... The guy did it multiple times he went out to the track with people like you who doubted him and still ran high 12's right in front of them.
The magazines vary so much. I have seen SLK 55 times 0-60 range from 4.3 -4.9 seconds... I have yet to see any magazine with a sub 13 second time listing for an SLK 55. I have seen M3's rated from 13.3-13.5 in magazines ranging from 105 mph-106 mph trap speeds.
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...amg-page4.html
Now, let's see a European mag showing faster M3 times. Does it even exist?
Improviz, your are the CSI of MBworld. I find your last couple posts pretty damn funny. Keep it up.
ANYWAY, THE CAR WASN'T STOCK IN THOSE PICS. Why are you so dumb that you can't comprehend that? Lee ran many 12 sec passses when he was stock & now he runs 12.3 with mods.
And with me vs SLK we did do a few manual mode rolling runs & it was a bit closer. there are vids of those.
WHAT ABOUT THE STANDING STARTS POES? GEARBOX PROBLEMS?






