Dual clutch transmission charactoristics
With mct or dct its a win lose ....win for performance and lose for daily driving; the torque converter in a traditional auto trans is what makes driving so smooth at low speeds and not grabby/jerky but also what robs the drivetrain of maximal power output to the wheels
even hyundai owners feel same characteristics
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=exTEL9QbZ8g
Last edited by PeterUbers; Nov 27, 2016 at 01:58 PM.
I will discuss with my advisor about doing the same thing to the GTS and my 2015 E63s wagon, because the 2016 MTC is now pretty close to prefect; grabby and smooth, no bucking.
Granted I have not taken it to the track yet...
Now you want to compare a $150k with a $300k+ car? I truly do not think it s a fair comparison...but my 458 Italia was a dream, but then I think that it 458 has the best gear box I have driven.
As it stands today my 2016 MTC shifts "better" (more precise and definitive) than my GTs, but it is my opinion.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The transition from 3rd to 4th gear in manual mode. If the RPMs are high, this shift is smooth, if the RPMs are low, this shift sounds like the transmission is wanting to hurt itself.
The transition from 2nd to 1st gear in any mode is sometimes clunky. Like when rolling up to a stoplight.




There is just no reliable way to get the clutch takeup perfect every time. As it wears, the fluid wears, temperature changes, it all affects the friction available vs. desired, and results in differing levels of engagement for a given amount of pressure. The car uses learned adaptations to try and be as close to designed engagement time as possible, but it's only so much it can do. Porsche does seem to have the PDK system dialed in more than the rest of the manufacturers, but that's a dual-clutch design and different architecture.
But in general, the TRANSMISSION is not the culprit, it's the torque converter/clutch pack. We do get failed 2nd and 3rd gear frictions from time to time on new cars, but if you have a serious delay between gears, take it to the dealer. If it just feels a little non-smooth, try altering your driving style for a couple days and see what happens.
AMG cars are designed to work on a track, not be ultra-smooth in traffic. There are base, non-AMG models that are much more suited for that, and the trade-off is less performance when you want to kick the car around.
Last edited by ItalianJoe1; Dec 2, 2016 at 01:23 AM. Reason: Removed incorrect information




It has a wet clutch pack in place of a torque converter, as all the AMG Speedshift transmissions do. You can't lump MCT and non-MCT transmissions, as the MCT has the wet clutch, and the non-amg cars without the MCT system use a traditional fluid torque converter.
There is just no reliable way to get the clutch takeup perfect every time. As it wears, the fluid wears, temperature changes, it all affects the friction available vs. desired, and results in differing levels of engagement for a given amount of pressure. The car uses learned adaptations to try and be as close to designed engagement time as possible, but it's only so much it can do. Porsche does seem to have the PDK system dialed in more than the rest of the manufacturers, but that's a dual-clutch design and different architecture.
But in general, the TRANSMISSION is not the culprit, it's the torque converter/clutch pack. We do get failed 2nd and 3rd gear frictions from time to time on new cars, but if you have a serious delay between gears, take it to the dealer. If it just feels a little non-smooth, try altering your driving style for a couple days and see what happens.
AMG cars are designed to work on a track, not be ultra-smooth in traffic. There are base, non-AMG models that are much more suited for that, and the trade-off is less performance when you want to kick the car around.
Separate discussion but...
Is the GTS transmission more efficient than the MCT? I mean in regards to crank hp vs wheel hp and drivetrain loss?
And my bad, I lumped the MCT with the traditional Benz trannies and I knew that was not correct LOL.
Last edited by Vic55; Nov 30, 2016 at 10:45 AM.
I do completely agree that these cars are not designed to drink a "Martini on the rocks, not stirred" on the way back from work but the adaptation has transformed my 2016 E63s wagon.




So the Benz "DCT" in the GTS does not operate or have the same components as, lets say, my Turbo S PDK, Lambo Huracan, or my BMW F10 M5?
Why did I think the GTS had true dual clutch mechanics?
I thought it had a true DCT also? hmm. Disappointing actually if not, wonder if the GTR will have a DCT.
I'm guessing the AMG version is probably similar in design then, but I personally haven't looked into it. It must be FAR stronger, so it doesn't have any shared components I would guess. But maybe they just stuffed a full DCT in the back, it's possible.
The CLA DCT drives like complete garbage, and nowhere near as well as an AMG MCT trans or a GT, so I assumed it was the other version.
Last edited by ItalianJoe1; Dec 2, 2016 at 01:25 AM.
Plus other tech videos
Last edited by Astolfo; Dec 1, 2016 at 07:29 PM.




It has a wet clutch pack in place of a torque converter, as all the AMG Speedshift transmissions do. You can't lump MCT and non-MCT transmissions, as the MCT has the wet clutch, and the non-amg cars without the MCT system use a traditional fluid torque converter.
This is not a Mercedes transmission (like the 722.9) but build by Getrag and more or less the updated version of the SLS DCT with improved software.




That would make more sense but then again I don't have the intel. I just know that the transmission clearly performs better than my 5 previous MCT's.




