Before You Buy a Car Out-of-State Consider the Lemon Laws
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Before You Buy a Car Out-of-State Consider the Lemon Laws
California buyers should beware of buying a new car out of state. California's very strong lemon law will not protect you. On a new car with high performance parts or new technology lemon law protection should be considered as important as insurance. You probably won't need it, but if you do it's good to have.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,470
Received 966 Likes
on
581 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
California buyers should beware of buying a new car out of state. California's very strong lemon law will not protect you. On a new car with high performance parts or new technology lemon law protection should be considered as important as insurance. You probably won't need it, but if you do it's good to have.
What happens to an owner of any vehicle that buys a new car and then 3 months later gets transferred to CA? You’re saying the state says ‘too bad’, there’s no recourse for you here? Makes no sense and seems discriminatory tbh.
Vic?
Bish
#3
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Are you 100% certain that the CA ‘Lemon Law’ wouldn’t protect an owner simply because the car was purchased out of state? It seems to me that the law should apply to the owner’s address, not the specifics of where the car was purchased.
What happens to an owner of any vehicle that buys a new car and then 3 months later gets transferred to CA? You’re saying the state says ‘too bad’, there’s no recourse for you here? Makes no sense and seems discriminatory tbh.
Vic?
Bish
Cummins, Inc. v. Superior Court (***) (2005) 36 Cal.4th 478, 483. The very first paragraph of the opinion tells the story:
The Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (hereafter sometimes referred to as the Act), Civil Code section 1791 et seq., provides that if a manufacturer or its representative in this state fails to repair a new motor vehicle to conform to any express warranty after a reasonable number of attempts to repair, the manufacturer must replace the vehicle or pay restitution. (§1793.2, subd. (d)(2).) The question presented in this case is whether a buyer who resides in California may bring suit against a manufacturer under the Act when the buyer purchased the vehicle in another state, but brought the vehicle for repair to the manufacturer's authorized repair facility in California, and repeated attempts to repair the vehicle proved unsuccessful. We conclude that the Act does not apply unless the vehicle was purchased in California.
The following 2 users liked this post by MalibuScott:
California John (01-13-2018),
thebishman (01-13-2018)
#4
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Yea i think it's the state you buy in.. Im not sure what California is... Maryland you have to have 3 dealer fixes for the same thing (major component.. not a speaker..), 4th times needs to be a replacement...also if it spends a certain amount of time in the shop within the 1st 15 months ( it's really been taht long since)... Again, Mercedes does well with a trade assist before any lemon law kicks in.. I had to do a CLA250 2 years ago and a long while ago on a E cab..
#5
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
This buy back was for a car that had been purchased 3 years earlier. California's Lemon Law's stiff buy back provisions protects vehicles for the full term of the new car warranty. Most states limit the length of buy back protection. For a car that is going to be lightly driven (and probably depreciate rapidly) long term buy back protection is even more important.
As to your specific point, Maryland's lemon law is better than many other states, but not as good as California. Maryland's law applies to new or leased motor vehicles (including cars, light trucks and motorcycles), registered in that state, that are less than 24 months old and have been driven less than 18,000 miles. I don't know if Maryland's lemon law protects a purchaser who bought the car in Maryland but then registered it in another state. It's possible (I haven't done the research) that such a purchaser will be without any lemon law protection altogether.
My point remains the best advice: California residents should not buy new cars outside of the state of California.
Last edited by MalibuScott; 01-13-2018 at 12:40 PM.
The following users liked this post:
thebishman (01-13-2018)
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
That was then. This is now. MBUSA no longer gets involved in negotiating Lemon Law buy back claims, believe it or not. Mercedes Benz now assigns such claims to a third party vendor. I recently handled a buyback of an E63 for a neighbor and MBUSA used Stericycle Expert Solutions as its "transfer agent" (Mercedes' words). The buyback check (for about 92% of the original purchase price plus my attorney's fees) came from "Impartial Services Group, LLC" written on its "MBUSA Escrow Account." The name on the check says it all: MBUSA tries to insulate itself from the buy back process and claims it acted in bad faith by hiring an entity which itself has a division claiming to be "impartial."
This buy back was for a car that had been purchased 3 years earlier. California's Lemon Law's stiff buy back provisions protects vehicles for the full term of the new car warranty. Most states limit the length of buy back protection. For a car that is going to be lightly driven (and probably depreciate rapidly) long term buy back protection is even more important.
As to your specific point, Maryland's lemon law is better than many other states, but not as good as California. Maryland's law applies to new or leased motor vehicles (including cars, light trucks and motorcycles), registered in that state, that are less than 24 months old and have been driven less than 18,000 miles. I don't know if Maryland's lemon law protects a purchaser who bought the car in Maryland but then registered it in another state. It's possible (I haven't done the research) that such a purchaser will be without any lemon law protection altogether.
My point remains the best advice: California residents should not buy new cars outside of the state of California.
This buy back was for a car that had been purchased 3 years earlier. California's Lemon Law's stiff buy back provisions protects vehicles for the full term of the new car warranty. Most states limit the length of buy back protection. For a car that is going to be lightly driven (and probably depreciate rapidly) long term buy back protection is even more important.
As to your specific point, Maryland's lemon law is better than many other states, but not as good as California. Maryland's law applies to new or leased motor vehicles (including cars, light trucks and motorcycles), registered in that state, that are less than 24 months old and have been driven less than 18,000 miles. I don't know if Maryland's lemon law protects a purchaser who bought the car in Maryland but then registered it in another state. It's possible (I haven't done the research) that such a purchaser will be without any lemon law protection altogether.
My point remains the best advice: California residents should not buy new cars outside of the state of California.
Trending Topics
#9
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
The purchaser of the motorhome in the Cummins case tried to ague a similar ambiguity. The California Lemon Law applies, as it is written, to "Every manufacturer of consumer goods sold in this state and for which the manufacturer has made an express warranty." The law imposes obligations on the manufacturer, such as that it have repair locations to fix the consumer goods. Cars are considered "consumer goods" and the buyers of motor vehicles have additional protections including buy back protection.
Does the phrase "sold in this state" mean the statute applies only to vehicles sold in California, or does it mean that if the manufacturer has sold motor vehicles in California generally, then the consumer protection laws apply in favor of buyers located in California and against the manufacturer no matter where the vehicle was sold. It's a fair question that the statute can be read either way. So we call that kind of a statute "ambiguous." But for the lack of a comma I can see that what I wrote could also be considered ambiguous.
The following users liked this post:
AMG 17GT (01-14-2018)
#10
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Well I hope since I bought my car in OH and it’s registered in KS I don’t have any major issues! lol
Currently everything seems fine although I do have one hell of a rattle somewhere on the passenger’s side of the dash that is worse in this cold weather.
Anyone else having any early ‘issues’?
Bish
Currently everything seems fine although I do have one hell of a rattle somewhere on the passenger’s side of the dash that is worse in this cold weather.
Anyone else having any early ‘issues’?
Bish
Your rights are somewhat problematic. I am not a Kansas lawyer, but according to the Kansas Lemon Law statute, Title 50, chapter 6, section 645 (a)(2), a vehicle protected by the law is defined as "a new motor vehicle which is sold or leased in this state." That sounds a lot more clear than the ambiguous California statute. It would therefore not apply to a vehicle bought in another state. Perhaps there are other statutory provisions or case law that have extended Kansas' protections. (In Kansas it appears to be only for 12 months. Likewise, most states are between 12 and 24 months with an additional limit of 18,000 miles. In California it's for the length of the new car warranty.)
I hope you don't have any problems that can't be promptly fixed!
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Bish:
Scott may be able to confirm this but IF you had to LL your car couldn’t you return it to the out of state selling dealer and do it under their law? There doesn’t seem to be a residency requirement in the LL.
Regards.
Scott may be able to confirm this but IF you had to LL your car couldn’t you return it to the out of state selling dealer and do it under their law? There doesn’t seem to be a residency requirement in the LL.
Regards.
#12
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
You buy your car in North Dakota. You register it in New Hampshire (one of the tax avoidance states) in the name of your Delaware LLC. You garage it in California where you have it serviced. Two days after buying the car you have a problem with the brakes. It takes 2 days to fix it and the problem goes away. Before the brake problem you put 100 miles on the car. After you've driven it 22,000 miles, 25 months later, that serious problem with the brakes occurs again. You bring it to the dealer 5 times but can't get it fixed satisfactorily. The car is in the shop for 35 days.
You'd be entitled to a buy back in California if you bought the car in California. If it was the same brake problem you could probably negotiate a buy back based on your initial purchase price, the taxes on that purchase price (between 9 & 9.5% in California) and one year's registration fees, minus a charge for usage based on a useful life of the car (under the California statute) of 120,000 miles. You'd get everything back on a $110,000 total cost purchase minus usage based on 100 miles divided by 120,000 miles ($91.67 of usage, so $109,908.33). But you can't use the California Lemon Laws. And the dealer to whom you take the car for service isn't liable. Would the manufacturer have to do the buy back? If so, based on the law of what state? And if it was a state with a limit on the buy back (18,000 miles or one or two years), you're SOL.
Buy backs are rare, but not as rare as you'd think.* And if you've got a lemon a buy back can be very important to you.
Bottom line is, the best rule is to buy the car from the dealer in the state you're in. If you find an out-of-state car, get a local dealer to trade for it and sell or lease it to you.
*Since 1990 I've lemoned three cars of my own, a 1991 500SL, a 2006 BMW 650i convertible and a 2010 BMW 535 GT.
Last edited by MalibuScott; 01-13-2018 at 09:47 PM.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,470
Received 966 Likes
on
581 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
MalibuScott makes a great point: try and get a local dealer to obtain the vehicle for you whenever possible if you find the car you love out of state.
#14
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Every out-of-state purchaser should therefore know what he’s getting into. That’s also true of out-of-state buyers from other states. The initial question is whether they’ll have any Lemon Law protection at all.
And Maryland’s Lemon Law appears to be run of the mill. I have no idea if that law would apply in the event of a purchase by someone from out-of-state who has the vehicle serviced outside of Maryland.
Sorry to hijack your thread but the information is relevant, timely and important. Any buyer who ventures out to buy a car from a dealer in another state should know what he's getting. And what he's not getting. Don't you agree?
The following users liked this post:
thebishman (01-14-2018)
#15
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
Before You Buy a Car Out-of-State Consider the Lemon Laws
Thanks to Vic55 for moving the posts over to this thread. (Why isn't he Vic63?)
Last edited by MalibuScott; 01-14-2018 at 11:12 PM.
#16
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Ill be moving the posts now, the dialogue is in order so it should read well. Please use this particular thread to discuss all issues. Thanks MalibuScott for your intel on this very important subject.
Because of the dating of the posts, they will supercede the OP's initial opening post for this thread but you all get the picture here.
Because of the dating of the posts, they will supercede the OP's initial opening post for this thread but you all get the picture here.
Last edited by Vic55; 01-15-2018 at 01:02 AM.
The following users liked this post:
MalibuScott (01-14-2018)
#17
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
... when I met the original owners of this website back in 2000 I had a W210 E55. I joined once it was set up and the 55 nomenclature was adopted. Over the years as the engines changed, my user name did not and I just left it. Im Vic55 in many forums: Benz, BMW, Audi, Porsche, Lambo, Ferrari... so I am forever linked by my first AMG, a silver E55 that was an amazing normally aspirated beast with 349hp (the most for a sedan at that time until the venerable E39 M5 came out- I had that too).
And Im also grateful to forums like this because it really got me started with Benz and then on to BMW and Porsche plus other nameplates. I love the forums and the members as I am always a member first, the peers here are what keeps me and others informed.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 2,470
Received 966 Likes
on
581 Posts
‘24 BMW iX M60
At last someone asks:
... when I met the original owners of this website back in 2000 I had a W210 E55. I joined once it was set up and the 55 nomenclature was adopted. Over the years as the engines changed, my user name did not and I just left it. Im Vic55 in many forums: Benz, BMW, Audi, Porsche, Lambo, Ferrari... so I am forever linked by my first AMG, a silver E55 that was an amazing normally aspirated beast with 349hp (the most for a sedan at that time until the venerable E39 M5 came out- I had that too).
And Im also grateful to forums like this because it really got me started with Benz and then on to BMW and Porsche plus other nameplates. I love the forums and the members as I am always a member first, the peers here are what keeps me and others informed.
... when I met the original owners of this website back in 2000 I had a W210 E55. I joined once it was set up and the 55 nomenclature was adopted. Over the years as the engines changed, my user name did not and I just left it. Im Vic55 in many forums: Benz, BMW, Audi, Porsche, Lambo, Ferrari... so I am forever linked by my first AMG, a silver E55 that was an amazing normally aspirated beast with 349hp (the most for a sedan at that time until the venerable E39 M5 came out- I had that too).
And Im also grateful to forums like this because it really got me started with Benz and then on to BMW and Porsche plus other nameplates. I love the forums and the members as I am always a member first, the peers here are what keeps me and others informed.
Bish
#19
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 979
Received 678 Likes
on
360 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
My first AMG was a non turbo CL55 which I bought in 2001. It was a special order and I was told it was at the VPC on September 11, 2001. Of course I wasn't thinking about the car on that date. Picked it up several days later while we were all still shell shocked.
My first Merc was a 1971 280 SL that I bought during Easter break 1971 at WI Simonson in Santa Monica. After I bought it I drove it across the country until I graduated from law school, thence back to Southern California. I put 15,000 miles on that car in 4 months and then sold it.
My first Merc was a 1971 280 SL that I bought during Easter break 1971 at WI Simonson in Santa Monica. After I bought it I drove it across the country until I graduated from law school, thence back to Southern California. I put 15,000 miles on that car in 4 months and then sold it.
#20
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Please keep this thread on track or Ill have to move the posts to a new thread "What did we first drive when we joined"
LOLOLOL I joke I joke
Free bump!!!!!!!!!!!
LOLOLOL I joke I joke
Free bump!!!!!!!!!!!
#22
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Nah no ones fault here, Im guilty too---- Its a fine line when threads go off tangent as to if they should be altered. Almost always a thread will slightly derail or completely fall off the tracks but then get back on. The only issue with that thread was it was Sponsor based.
So in the spirit of this thread I will say this; Ive bought 31 new cars in 10 years from in state and out of state. And while I should have done some LL research I didnt knowing I had the factory warranty behind it and I just dont like to approach my purchase experience that way. This may be odd to some but I like the research, acquistion and negotiation process, obviously not as much as the owneship time but If Im afraid or go in half empty I just will probably back out pre purchase.
In almost 18 years of new car purchases (over 40) I have had zero lemons. Did I beat the odds? I have no clue. Im happy.
So in the spirit of this thread I will say this; Ive bought 31 new cars in 10 years from in state and out of state. And while I should have done some LL research I didnt knowing I had the factory warranty behind it and I just dont like to approach my purchase experience that way. This may be odd to some but I like the research, acquistion and negotiation process, obviously not as much as the owneship time but If Im afraid or go in half empty I just will probably back out pre purchase.
In almost 18 years of new car purchases (over 40) I have had zero lemons. Did I beat the odds? I have no clue. Im happy.
The following users liked this post:
thebishman (01-15-2018)
#23
Don't most people try and buy a car locally first, and then only when availability or huge differences in price come in to play, start looking in other cities and other states????
#24
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Obviously when I was looking for my M4 I went locally as there were quite a few on the ground but when I wanted my ED1 I looked at Ohio, Texas, and my home state.
#25
Not when its at the price point that we consider. These are not commodity units per se and just sitting on every lot exactly optioned as you want. Your mileage may vary but when I was shopping for my GTS, Ferraris, Bentley, Lambo, and few choice Benzes and Bimmers, I looked out of state equally. Market conditions and demand can really swing a deal tens of thousands of dollars if you shop outside of your market. A great example is some of the early adopter buyers on GTR's who paid 40 to 50k over msrp but could have bought the car out of state for maybe MSRP or 5k over; huge difference in dollars.
Obviously when I was looking for my M4 I went locally as there were quite a few on the ground but when I wanted my ED1 I looked at Ohio, Texas, and my home state.
Obviously when I was looking for my M4 I went locally as there were quite a few on the ground but when I wanted my ED1 I looked at Ohio, Texas, and my home state.
Yes! I totally agree. That's why I said when availability and price come into play, people look outside their state. There are great deals to be had in states like Ohio.