Deutscher_Wagen

I always get 240s for loaners when my 230 is in... I usualy can't wait to get my 230 back.
Anyone who thinks a 240 will beat a 230 is utterly retarded.

The only 240 ever worth driving is a blown one!

ddrango

Can't find 0-60 times for the 1.8 C230K and the 2.6 C240. But from driving the 2.6 C240, it has great power to weight feeling. My prediction is a lil more than 7 sec to 60mph with the 2.6. I love the 05' C240, haven't tried any other. I highly enjoyed the manumatic also.

ctC230K

the c240 has the dog of a 2.6L V6, why, why why would anyone get the 240? to have a V6? get the 320, it has some power atleast. the spoilers on the 240 might appeal to grandpa but not anyone under 30.
true that video doesn't show my time but it would be very difficult to record without a passenger in the car with a video camera because the gtech only flashes the 0-60 for a few seconds then goes to the 1/4 mile display.
last time i'm going to say this, mbusa 0-60 times are very conservative with two adults and a full tank of gas.

but the best part of this thread is that you guys were inside on your computer all day arguing about stupid 230 vs. 240 differences while i was outside drivin my 230 on this sunny and warm day.

ddrango

Um, ok me being 17 and some and living on cars since i was 10 and know so much crap about them, working on them, found the 05'C240 black on black extremely appealing. And it's powerful.

ctC230K

and you didn't find the 05' C230 black on black appealing because?

ddrango

Never drove or really looked at it. But it looks good as I now see.

ddrango

It's got a 1.8 man, that turns me off. What is it, a B16? (A B16 is the most common Honda engine, VTEC, 1.8 Liters.)

ctC230K

definatly drive it. the 6 speed. open the windows, push the clutch in, rev the gas. you'll love it.

ctC230K

LOL are you serious?? NO it's not a honda engine. it's a supercharged mercedes M271 engine. damn.

ddrango

Arite, I guess I'll give it a try. I pushed off buyign a car until this summer. So i na few months, I'll look int oit. Just the 4cyl., I don't know. But I'll try it, since it's cheaper if not the same price.

Capt Nemo o2

Well if thats the route we're going to take... Almost ALL cars suck 'cause my dads Cobra smokes them (0-60 in under 3 seconds)

ddrango

Hahaha...I was being sarcastic...lol a MBZ with a Honda engine, that will be the day...lol srry

ctC230K

forget that it's a 4cyl 1.8. it's faster than the MB V6 2.6 and the BMW I6 2.5

ddrango

Really? How does it sound? Can you change the pulley?

ctC230K

I made this video yesterday driving in a parking garage.
http://home.earthlink.net/~ctc230k/C...kingGarage.wmv
and take a look at the Kleemann Performance Kits, belt and pully and chip upgrades.
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/Main/tun...erformancekits

LMing

I am sorry to say this, B16 is a 1.6 liter engine, and I really suggest you do your homework before you ask anymore question since a lot of your questions you asked are posted already in the fourm. Plus you can't judge the car by its displacement. Let's just say if you want the sport look and the sport engine sound, go for C230, if you want the comfort and quietness, get the C240. I hope everyone agress with me.

dmatre

Hey, I'm not raggin' on your car. It's all good here. I'm raggin' on you.

In your first quote, you state that your 240 will eat the 230 at highway speeds or on hot days. 2nd quote is only on hot days. 3rd quote is 230 will smoke a 240.

Which is it? Having trouble making up your mind?

To answer your questions:
1) I'm 40
2) Post what movies you like. But please, let's see something to support your claim that your 240 is faster than a 230. Anyone here who's driven both, on a hot or cold day, will most likely agree that the 230 is going to be faster. (Not that the 240 is a bad car, it's simply aimed at a different market segment)
3) I don't care why you bought your 240. It's a nice car, and its purchase doesn't need to be defended.
Finally: Make up your fawkin mind, is the 240 faster or slower than the 230?

mick1

your car sure sounds nice great video btw. thanks for sharing.

DACHIGGA

My 02 c230 will smoke a 240 hot day, highway, or both, period.

TwofourT

I love how every guy who mentions the thought of leasing or purchasing a c240 on this forum is instantly told that he's making a mistake.
Speed is not the reason why I purchased my car. I certainly hope all you 230 guys didnt just buy your 230 over a 240 soley because it is faster off the line? I find that in light to light traffic the 240 is adequate, she really gets going on the highway when she is able to sing at those higher octives.

Take a second and consider what you are telling this guy.."Hey man, forget the 240, the 230 is a bit faster"

Why not mention the c240 has 4matic available as the 230 does not, or that the interior is more refined with wood as opposed to silver plastic? Be sure to mention to him that your 230 has four cylinders and the 240 has six. Also tell him to take the 230 out for a spin and to make sure he enjoys the bumpy and 'down to road' feel of the sport springs and larger wheels over the 240's more luxurious ride? How about that a 230 steering wheel is sport based and appears smaller then the 240..or that the 240 comes with a factory mounted sub.

The main reason I purchased my 240 was because I needed 4matic. Coming from a 230 (which sucked in New York weather) I can now say I would take my 240 over the 230 anyday, my reasons mentioned above.

I think the 230 is faster to a negligible amount, and thats why there is always an arguement between the two speeds. If one was apparently faster then the other there would be no arguement. But with such a small difference in speed who really cares at this point?

Who's to say this guy really wants a plastic interior and a bit 'faster' ride? As 'enthusiats', you should know that speed is not the only reason for purchasing a car...

ctC230K

all reasons why i choose the 230 over the 240 :p

revstriker

Nicely put. I would choose a C240 over a C230 just about any day of the week. If I was interested in power and speed, then I probably would not be purchasing a Mercedes.

When comparing "bang for the buck", the C230 would probably be the winner here. I think the cost of the C230 is really the reason a lot of people have this car. It's funny, back in 2002, a lot of the young people were buying the C240 (if they weren't buying the C230 Hatchback). Price is probably the reason why more people here don't have the C320.

Bottom line is that people choose cars for different reasons. The C240 is a very nice entry level luxury sedan. It's built more for comfort than speed. But it certainly has ample power to do what's needed (passing, etc.).

Saprissa

I love both of my C320's

JDM

I enjoy my C240. I drove a w202 C230 and enjoyd it also, almost bought one, but the dealer sold it to someone else while I was dragging my feet, and sold me w203 C240 instead. Power wise, they felt the same to me, but the 230 reminded me of temporary power, like a turbo. Ive cruised my 240 up to 132 and it felt very steady, tach was about 5800 rpm's, had a little pedal left. The engine was confident, and not overwound. I held there for about a mile, then settled down. I never want to push it all the way, (then I cant imagine what's possible.) I estimate 138 to be it though.

mbny

very true. being only 17 years old, i would consider looking into the C230. I'm 26 and the AMG bodykit and rims is what really caught my attention to the C-class. otherwise it was pretty much the G35 coupe which i wasn't completely in love with. C240 is a nice car, more luxurious and conservative. but to me was boring looking, has rims i don't like, and abit sluggish (not that the C230 is a fast car either though). i came out of a bmw and what i loved most about it, was it looked sporty, engine was loud and smooth, exhaust note, tight handling, basically all the things the C230 currently has. just check out both, test drive both and make your own decision. don't be intimidated by others opionions. it is your money afterall