Drove 06 C350
08-22-2005, 04:24 PM
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
Drove 06 C350
I'm in love.
I haven't driven any car in years that seemed to be such an ideal sports sedan. The performance with the 350 engine and 7G transmission seems like a perfect match for this car. Handling, of course, is excellent and even feels better than in the 320 apparently due to the responsive engine.
I'm getting the C350 to replace my 06 E350 which is a great car but not as much fun to drive as the C350. Also, the C350 doesn't have the problem prone SBC brakes of the E Class.
I haven't driven any car in years that seemed to be such an ideal sports sedan. The performance with the 350 engine and 7G transmission seems like a perfect match for this car. Handling, of course, is excellent and even feels better than in the 320 apparently due to the responsive engine.
I'm getting the C350 to replace my 06 E350 which is a great car but not as much fun to drive as the C350. Also, the C350 doesn't have the problem prone SBC brakes of the E Class.
08-22-2005, 04:32 PM
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by MB-JIM
I'm in love.
I haven't driven any car in years that seemed to be such an ideal sports sedan. The performance with the 350 engine and 7G transmission seems like a perfect match for this car. Handling, of course, is excellent and even feels better than in the 320 apparently due to the responsive engine.
I'm getting the C350 to replace my 06 E350 which is a great car but not as much fun to drive as the C350. Also, the C350 doesn't have the problem prone SBC brakes of the E Class.
I haven't driven any car in years that seemed to be such an ideal sports sedan. The performance with the 350 engine and 7G transmission seems like a perfect match for this car. Handling, of course, is excellent and even feels better than in the 320 apparently due to the responsive engine.
I'm getting the C350 to replace my 06 E350 which is a great car but not as much fun to drive as the C350. Also, the C350 doesn't have the problem prone SBC brakes of the E Class.
08-22-2005, 04:34 PM
#4
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
Originally Posted by mick1
wow Jim, you sure change cars quickly. You can't own that 06 e350 for that long
08-22-2005, 06:15 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
Originally Posted by MB-JIM
You are right. I had a 2004 E500, then 2005 E320 CDI and then the 2006 E350. I have come to the conclusion that I'm not an E Class person.
08-22-2005, 06:49 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
Originally Posted by fast_amg
Yeah hes right because in Summer 06 the W203 Body will be gone. W204 in summer 06. So why get an 06 C-Class when W204 is comming out next summer ?
Trending Topics
08-22-2005, 08:16 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gadsden, Alabama
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'06 C350 4MATIC
Do not pass go, go directly to 07
Yeah hes right because in Summer 06 the W203 Body will be gone. W204 in summer 06. So why get an 06 C-Class when W204 is comming out next summer ?
Sometimes you gotta **** or get off the pot.
There will always be the newest or the fastest or the smartest or the cheapest.
Last edited by Tishers; 08-22-2005 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Messed up title
08-22-2005, 08:28 PM
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
you're right Tishers,
but I think when it comes to MB's, it might be just a good idea to hold off on the "brand new" chassis model. I'm not an expert, but I have noted patterns wherewith a new chassis (ex: W201-W202 or W202-W203 ) has inherited the previous chassis engine and some engineering, but all the new stuff is full of bugs and problems. Just like you say with computers.
I believe the 2006 W203 will probably be a more reliable (relatively speaking for all you MB reliability nit-pickers
) than the 2007 W204.
And plus the body style is going to be a huge ding-dong for the MB Classique stylists or people are going to love it for the BMW-esque design attributes.
Either way, it's a wait & see scenario, but no doubt technology and design will constantly be changing and re-designing, but not always for the better. IMO.
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
but I think when it comes to MB's, it might be just a good idea to hold off on the "brand new" chassis model. I'm not an expert, but I have noted patterns wherewith a new chassis (ex: W201-W202 or W202-W203 ) has inherited the previous chassis engine and some engineering, but all the new stuff is full of bugs and problems. Just like you say with computers.
I believe the 2006 W203 will probably be a more reliable (relatively speaking for all you MB reliability nit-pickers
) than the 2007 W204.And plus the body style is going to be a huge ding-dong for the MB Classique stylists or people are going to love it for the BMW-esque design attributes.
Either way, it's a wait & see scenario, but no doubt technology and design will constantly be changing and re-designing, but not always for the better. IMO.
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
08-22-2005, 08:46 PM
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
how is that a "better" deal ? if 1) he hasn't bought the car yet and 2) he didn't post the price he will pay for his C350 ?
'05 C230K SS Fully Loaded for $30.5K
what if I told you i got a '04.5 C320 SS Fully Loaded for $27K ?
I'm not bashing you, quite the opposite, congrats on your new car, but do know that better deals are relative, and quite dependent on when and where you buy it.
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
'05 C230K SS Fully Loaded for $30.5K
what if I told you i got a '04.5 C320 SS Fully Loaded for $27K ?
I'm not bashing you, quite the opposite, congrats on your new car, but do know that better deals are relative, and quite dependent on when and where you buy it.
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
08-22-2005, 09:28 PM
#12
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
[QUOTE=Saprissa]you're right Tishers,
but I think when it comes to MB's, it might be just a good idea to hold off on the "brand new" chassis model. I'm not an expert, but I have noted patterns wherewith a new chassis (ex: W201-W202 or W202-W203 ) has inherited the previous chassis engine and some engineering, but all the new stuff is full of bugs and problems. Just like you say with computers.
I believe the 2006 W203 will probably be a more reliable (relatively speaking for all you MB reliability nit-pickers ) than the 2007 W204.
And plus the body style is going to be a huge ding-dong for the MB Classique stylists or people are going to love it for the BMW-esque design attributes.
Either way, it's a wait & see scenario, but no doubt technology and design will constantly be changing and re-designing, but not always for the better. IMO.
I agree with you about new models. I have wanted a mature car that I can keep for a number of years and I believe a 2006 W203 will be my best choice. I'm taking advantage of tourist delivery with the 7% discount plus some more off from my dealer. It's still a lot for a C Class since I will have full leather, Navigation, HK sound and the rear pass through in addition to the normal options.
but I think when it comes to MB's, it might be just a good idea to hold off on the "brand new" chassis model. I'm not an expert, but I have noted patterns wherewith a new chassis (ex: W201-W202 or W202-W203 ) has inherited the previous chassis engine and some engineering, but all the new stuff is full of bugs and problems. Just like you say with computers.
I believe the 2006 W203 will probably be a more reliable (relatively speaking for all you MB reliability nit-pickers
) than the 2007 W204.And plus the body style is going to be a huge ding-dong for the MB Classique stylists or people are going to love it for the BMW-esque design attributes.
Either way, it's a wait & see scenario, but no doubt technology and design will constantly be changing and re-designing, but not always for the better. IMO.
I agree with you about new models. I have wanted a mature car that I can keep for a number of years and I believe a 2006 W203 will be my best choice. I'm taking advantage of tourist delivery with the 7% discount plus some more off from my dealer. It's still a lot for a C Class since I will have full leather, Navigation, HK sound and the rear pass through in addition to the normal options.
08-22-2005, 10:28 PM
#13
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congrats.
Did you get the Sport or Luxury version?
Magazines always said that the c230k was more fun to drive than the c320 because it felt more nimble and light.
How do you think this c350 model compares in that dept. compared to the sedan kompressor. How does that weight feel for comparo in the fun dept.
Did you get the Sport or Luxury version?
Magazines always said that the c230k was more fun to drive than the c320 because it felt more nimble and light.
How do you think this c350 model compares in that dept. compared to the sedan kompressor. How does that weight feel for comparo in the fun dept.
08-22-2005, 10:51 PM
#15
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
Originally Posted by blk900t
Congrats.
Did you get the Sport or Luxury version?
Magazines always said that the c230k was more fun to drive than the c320 because it felt more nimble and light.
How do you think this c350 model compares in that dept. compared to the sedan kompressor. How does that weight feel for comparo in the fun dept.
Did you get the Sport or Luxury version?
Magazines always said that the c230k was more fun to drive than the c320 because it felt more nimble and light.
How do you think this c350 model compares in that dept. compared to the sedan kompressor. How does that weight feel for comparo in the fun dept.
I got the Luxury Version since I'm coming from the E350. The car has a heavy feeling but the handling is excellent. For me it's a lot more fun to drive than the E Class. I have not driven the C230K but a couple years ago I had a 2002 C320. This car feels much better in many ways to the 02 C320 starting with the seat comfort. One reason I didn't want the sport was because I had a 99 CLK 430. The low profile tires were very noisy and the ride was harsh. If you are looking for a light feeling steering the C350 is not your car. I know it's a poor comparison but it feels to me like it's a small S Class that really handles.
08-22-2005, 11:48 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gadsden, Alabama
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'06 C350 4MATIC
Try B 4 U Buy
Take all of the C's out on the road. It really helped settle my mind before placing an order for a new sub-model, sight-unseen.
The 230 just seemed too "buzzy" but it did have that nice feel like a race horse.
The 240 just seemed sad that it was a six cyl and was getting slapped silly by it's "junior" model (230).
The 320 had a smoother takeoff and a more consistent acceleration.
I went the 350 route after driving an E350 to feel how the motor took off.
I was undecided when I went into the dealership but after an entire day of test driving, then re-test driving, going home to sleep on it and then coming back to drive again. Then I was comfortable with my decision.
Again, these feelings and perceptions of the vehicles were totally subjective
The 230 just seemed too "buzzy" but it did have that nice feel like a race horse.
The 240 just seemed sad that it was a six cyl and was getting slapped silly by it's "junior" model (230).
The 320 had a smoother takeoff and a more consistent acceleration.
I went the 350 route after driving an E350 to feel how the motor took off.
I was undecided when I went into the dealership but after an entire day of test driving, then re-test driving, going home to sleep on it and then coming back to drive again. Then I was comfortable with my decision.
Again, these feelings and perceptions of the vehicles were totally subjective
08-23-2005, 12:59 AM
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
Originally Posted by Tishers
Again, these feelings and perceptions of the vehicles were totally subjective
once again you're right on the money.
I find it funny, how people say one car is faster than another, or rides better than the other, etc.... without having driven more than just their own car.
Asking or getting advice on a new car on this forum is not a bad thing, but you get a lot of opinionated feelings and emotions, and the bottom line is that the person buying the car, basically needs to just get out and DRIVE !!
the more you drive them, the better YOU can make a sound decision.
Carlos
Saprissa@aol.com
08-23-2005, 10:41 AM
#18
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'14 GLK250 Diesel
Well, my personal favorite among the new drivetrains is the so-called C280 [3 liter priced like the old C240]. Better value in my mind than the C350, but I surely wouldn't argue with anyone who can afford to move up the line.
Bashing the C240 is such a bore; I think our car has adequate power for its primary use as a touring car, but the new engine/trans combination has me, like Jim, thinking about making a change. I can get everything I want on the C280 for around $35k...thinking very hard about this....
Bashing the C240 is such a bore; I think our car has adequate power for its primary use as a touring car, but the new engine/trans combination has me, like Jim, thinking about making a change. I can get everything I want on the C280 for around $35k...thinking very hard about this....
09-06-2005, 11:57 AM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
'08 CLK320CDI AMG// '13 E500 Coupe AMG// '17 E350d AMG
Originally Posted by MB-JIM
You are right. I had a 2004 E500, then 2005 E320 CDI and then the 2006 E350. I have come to the conclusion that I'm not an E Class person.
First time I see here a US guy with a diesel car
09-06-2005, 04:24 PM
#20
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
The 04 E500 was potentially a great car but the brakes did strange things that I didn't like. Also, my 7G transmission didn't shift smoothly. I might have kept the 500 but the E320 CDI looked like a better choice.
The CDI had lots of torque and the 5G transmission was smooth. I didn't like the slight turbo lag followed by the sudden thrust. I prefer the linear acceleration of a non-turbo car. I might have kept the CDI because of its excellent fuel economy but I had a problem. My car had a diesel ordor that stunk up my garage and the dealer wasn't able to find the source of the problem so I decided to trade for the E350.
The E350 is really a great car. Fortunately my 7G transmission was extremely smooth and the brakes were acceptable if not perfect. I could have been satisfied with the E350 but I have always preferred the C Class size car. When I found I would be able to get a C350 with such great performance and the precise handling of the C Class I couldn't resist the temptation to switch.
The CDI had lots of torque and the 5G transmission was smooth. I didn't like the slight turbo lag followed by the sudden thrust. I prefer the linear acceleration of a non-turbo car. I might have kept the CDI because of its excellent fuel economy but I had a problem. My car had a diesel ordor that stunk up my garage and the dealer wasn't able to find the source of the problem so I decided to trade for the E350.
The E350 is really a great car. Fortunately my 7G transmission was extremely smooth and the brakes were acceptable if not perfect. I could have been satisfied with the E350 but I have always preferred the C Class size car. When I found I would be able to get a C350 with such great performance and the precise handling of the C Class I couldn't resist the temptation to switch.
09-06-2005, 05:30 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast_amg
Yeah hes right because in Summer 06 the W203 Body will be gone. W204 in summer 06. So why get an 06 C-Class when W204 is comming out next summer ?
09-06-2005, 06:05 PM
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
'08 CLK320CDI AMG// '13 E500 Coupe AMG// '17 E350d AMG
Originally Posted by MB-JIM
The CDI had lots of torque and the 5G transmission was smooth. I didn't like the slight turbo lag followed by the sudden thrust. I prefer the linear acceleration of a non-turbo car. I might have kept the CDI because of its excellent fuel economy but I had a problem. My car had a diesel ordor that stunk up my garage and the dealer wasn't able to find the source of the problem so I decided to trade for the E350.
Its a total different story in Europe, cruising in highways and out of it its just another world, so many twisty roads, perfect for a diesel car and its low band torque and power, not in US, beside of the fuel economy :p
