DCX Crossfire
09-09-2002, 04:54 PM
#26
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Xeon
haha..as a slk owner....i agree that it REALLY looks and FEELS like a SLk...why is DC doing this?? to get rid of excess slk parts?
haha..as a slk owner....i agree that it REALLY looks and FEELS like a SLk...why is DC doing this?? to get rid of excess slk parts?
09-09-2002, 05:21 PM
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by Enze6997
I think I am going to buy that stereo and the shifter and put it in my coupe!
I think I am going to buy that stereo and the shifter and put it in my coupe!
09-10-2002, 12:41 AM
#30
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20,081
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by DCX Engineer
I agree.
I like it, but not with only two seats for my daily driver.
I believe the volume for the US is 18k units. It is powered by the MB 3.2L V6 and available with a 6-speed manual. The engine has the plastic covers on it with the Chrysler Winged Logo. I think it will be a hot seller - at least good for the allocated 18k units.
I agree.
I like it, but not with only two seats for my daily driver.
I believe the volume for the US is 18k units. It is powered by the MB 3.2L V6 and available with a 6-speed manual. The engine has the plastic covers on it with the Chrysler Winged Logo. I think it will be a hot seller - at least good for the allocated 18k units.
09-10-2002, 04:16 AM
#32
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by Buellwinkle
No it's an Chrysler, you can probably do it for $2,500. The $8,400 price must be for cars with the three point star.
No it's an Chrysler, you can probably do it for $2,500. The $8,400 price must be for cars with the three point star.
i think Brabus has a sub company to mod Chrysler/Dodge. forgot what is called though
09-10-2002, 08:47 AM
#33
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20,081
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by Buellwinkle
No it's an Chrysler, you can probably do it for $2,500. The $8,400 price must be for cars with the three point star.
No it's an Chrysler, you can probably do it for $2,500. The $8,400 price must be for cars with the three point star.
09-10-2002, 10:48 AM
#34
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 6 spd manual
How has this thread managed to stay in the C-Class forum so long when it has nothing to do with the C-Class and only a corporate relationship to Mercedes? Moderators asleep at the wheel? Ha ha!!!
09-10-2002, 12:22 PM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by pocholin
Better yet, but imagine a Chrysler with a Kleeman supercharger, that would help to make it exotic
Better yet, but imagine a Chrysler with a Kleeman supercharger, that would help to make it exotic
09-10-2002, 12:39 PM
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 CLK320
It looks like
the same 'stylists' that turned out the hideous Prowler and the PT Cruiser got put to work again...
Except they raided the MB parts bin for interior parts and powertrain assemblies - I guess they couldn't cobble together more Neon parts and try to sell it for $35k + and get the public to buy off on the idea.
IMO, its still has all the hallmarks of ugly Chrysler styling - sort of the like the early 60's (1960 - 1964) for Mopars - undeniably ugly, but it gets someone's attention...
Think of Imperials, Valiants, Lancers, and the Dart - the fake spare tire in the trunklid, the wierd fins and the bombsight taillights - truly fine styling, huh?
Except they raided the MB parts bin for interior parts and powertrain assemblies - I guess they couldn't cobble together more Neon parts and try to sell it for $35k + and get the public to buy off on the idea.
IMO, its still has all the hallmarks of ugly Chrysler styling - sort of the like the early 60's (1960 - 1964) for Mopars - undeniably ugly, but it gets someone's attention...
Think of Imperials, Valiants, Lancers, and the Dart - the fake spare tire in the trunklid, the wierd fins and the bombsight taillights - truly fine styling, huh?
09-10-2002, 09:59 PM
#38
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think about a 5.7L Aluminum HEMI V8 pumping out over 350hp with a MB designed 5-speed automatic transmission in a rear drive 300N. Don't forget MB electronics, ESP, seat frames , axles and many other E-Class type parts all in a Chrysler for around $35k.
09-11-2002, 12:07 AM
#39
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20,081
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by DCX Engineer
Think about a 5.7L Aluminum HEMI V8 pumping out over 350hp with a MB designed 5-speed automatic transmission in a rear drive 300N. Don't forget MB electronics, ESP, seat frames , axles and many other E-Class type parts all in a Chrysler for around $35k.
Think about a 5.7L Aluminum HEMI V8 pumping out over 350hp with a MB designed 5-speed automatic transmission in a rear drive 300N. Don't forget MB electronics, ESP, seat frames , axles and many other E-Class type parts all in a Chrysler for around $35k.
09-11-2002, 03:46 AM
#40
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by DCX Engineer
Think about a 5.7L Aluminum HEMI V8 pumping out over 350hp with a MB designed 5-speed automatic transmission in a rear drive 300N. Don't forget MB electronics, ESP, seat frames , axles and many other E-Class type parts all in a Chrysler for around $35k.
Think about a 5.7L Aluminum HEMI V8 pumping out over 350hp with a MB designed 5-speed automatic transmission in a rear drive 300N. Don't forget MB electronics, ESP, seat frames , axles and many other E-Class type parts all in a Chrysler for around $35k.
09-11-2002, 08:55 AM
#41
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20,081
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Volvo V90 CC
Originally posted by FrankW
5.7 liter V8 only 350hps?, what are you smoking?
5.7 liter V8 only 350hps?, what are you smoking?
Vettes have the 5.7 lt and produce 385 hp for 2003, but from 1998-2002 they were rated at 345 hp, so it makes sense to use that number.
09-11-2002, 05:37 PM
#42
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by pocholin
The new Pontiac GTO is going to have the LS1 (5.7 liter) and it is going to have somewhere around 350 hp.
Vettes have the 5.7 lt and produce 385 hp for 2003, but from 1998-2002 they were rated at 345 hp, so it makes sense to use that number.
The new Pontiac GTO is going to have the LS1 (5.7 liter) and it is going to have somewhere around 350 hp.
Vettes have the 5.7 lt and produce 385 hp for 2003, but from 1998-2002 they were rated at 345 hp, so it makes sense to use that number.
I never got how or why Ford/GM make big displacemen engines with little hps in compareson when Japanese/German/Italian can make more power from smaller desplacement engines.i.e. the Mustang GT has a 4.6 liter V8, but it can only produce 250 hps and some 290 torque. Come on, 4.6 V8 that is at least worth 300 hps. in contrary, G35/Skyline uses a 3.5 V6 that makes 260 hps and around 250 torque. The 360 modena has a 3.6 V8 that makes 400 hps.
09-11-2002, 06:47 PM
#43
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'01 C240/6
Originally posted by pocholin
Better yet, but imagine a Chrysler with a Kleeman supercharger, that would help to make it exotic
Better yet, but imagine a Chrysler with a Kleeman supercharger, that would help to make it exotic
09-12-2002, 07:08 PM
#45
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FrankW
Still, "what are they smoking" I never got how or why Ford/GM make big displacemen engines with little hps in compareson when Japanese/German/Italian can make more power from smaller desplacement engines.
Still, "what are they smoking"
I never got how or why Ford/GM make big displacemen engines with little hps in compareson when Japanese/German/Italian can make more power from smaller desplacement engines.
09-12-2002, 11:41 PM
#46
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DCX, I remember seeing that car at the auto show in Detroit, the 300Hemi. I think it was 2000, but don't remember for sure. What I do remember about it was the hillariousness of the display. They had it mounted up a couple feet on this turntable w/ a joystick so that people could spin it around and tilt it to look inside while not being able to get close enough to touch it. Unfortunately, they didn't seem to plan for little kids playing with the joystick and they could get that thing to spin a little more than they planned for. I still remember some little kid getting that car spinning a little too much and the Chrysler people pulling the plug on the display for the rest of the show.
dave
dave
09-13-2002, 01:44 AM
#47
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by DCX Engineer
I forgot to mention that Chrysler had a 3.2L 24V V-6 aluminum engine pumping out 225hp (1999-2001) were the MB 3.2L V-6 has only 221hp. We have now discontinued the 3.2L and only make the 3.5L making up to 255hp.
I forgot to mention that Chrysler had a 3.2L 24V V-6 aluminum engine pumping out 225hp (1999-2001) were the MB 3.2L V-6 has only 221hp. We have now discontinued the 3.2L and only make the 3.5L making up to 255hp.
09-13-2002, 07:42 PM
#48
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FrankW
which car was it used on? never know that one
which car was it used on? never know that one
The 3.5L was the Prowler engine and currently used in Intrepid, Concorde and 300M.
09-13-2002, 08:08 PM
#49
Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-13-2002, 09:43 PM
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
Chrysler engine in M-B?
Originally posted by DCX Engineer
The 3.2L version in 1999-2001 Dodge Intrepid and Chrysler Concorde.
The 3.5L was the Prowler engine and currently used in Intrepid, Concorde and 300M.
The 3.2L version in 1999-2001 Dodge Intrepid and Chrysler Concorde.
The 3.5L was the Prowler engine and currently used in Intrepid, Concorde and 300M.
