C240's ONLY
again
06-01-2007, 10:29 AM
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dia Blk '06 C230 w/3 pedals
I almost got smoaked the other day by this E36 M3. I saw the slightly crooked M emblem and backed off. Funny thing tho: it had these little 15" wheels, thin body moulding, no M front spoiler, side skirts nor rear diffuser and single pipe exhaust. Do you think someone debadged a 318 and tried to pas it off as an M car?
06-01-2007, 01:52 PM
#83
Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO.
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C230K SS (6 spd)
haha you guys are crazy its safe to say that belive it or not not every car out there is faster than a c240 maybe most but not all anyways i know that a c240 is faster than a 328 and second what does 0-60 matter? were on the highway here not at a red light i grant that its slow 0-60 but cumon HATERS how much faster is a c230 komp sedan compared to a 240 anyway?
You know what,.............. your c240 would blow a c230 away.
06-01-2007, 02:13 PM
#85
Super Moderator
haha you guys are crazy its safe to say that belive it or not not every car out there is faster than a c240 maybe most but not all anyways i know that a c240 is faster than a 328 and second what does 0-60 matter? were on the highway here not at a red light i grant that its slow 0-60 but cumon HATERS how much faster is a c230 komp sedan compared to a 240 anyway?
2005 C240:
168hp @ 5700RPM
177lb-ft @ 4700RPM
2005 C230:
189hp @ 5800RPM
192lb-ft @ 3500RPM
if you can't read or can't understand those figures (which I'm pretty sure you can't), the C230 has more torque at a lower RPM and 21hp more than your C240.
also, MBUSA states the 2005 C230 0-60 at 7.5seconds and many reviewers have gotten it to 7.1. MBUSA states the 2005 C240's 0-60 at 8.7seconds. since you know nothing about cars, 1.2seconds is a lot of damn time. the C230 is damn slow and the C240 is a lot worse, so you're not smoaking anything... well, by the way you speak and think, you HAVE to be smoking something.
btw, your ghetto cold air intake ain't giving you the 21hp that you're down. I'd say it'll give you 2hp and that's being generous, you may even be losing hp with that ghetto setup.
06-01-2007, 03:52 PM
#86
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dia Blk '06 C230 w/3 pedals
06-01-2007, 05:20 PM
#91
Super Moderator
06-01-2007, 05:23 PM
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1993 Cutlass Ciera SL w/ 3300 Buick Engine
06-01-2007, 05:26 PM
#93
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'03 C230 Sedan
), but I thought I'd pop back.
06-01-2007, 06:15 PM
#95
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 18,414
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2007 E63
dude, you're a retard. do you really think your C240 is all that? do you know how much power your car makes
2005 C240:
168hp @ 5700RPM
177lb-ft @ 4700RPM
2005 C230:
189hp @ 5800RPM
192lb-ft @ 3500RPM
if you can't read or can't understand those figures (which I'm pretty sure you can't), the C230 has more torque at a lower RPM and 21hp more than your C240.
also, MBUSA states the 2005 C230 0-60 at 7.5seconds and many reviewers have gotten it to 7.1. MBUSA states the 2005 C240's 0-60 at 8.7seconds. since you know nothing about cars, 1.2seconds is a lot of damn time. the C230 is damn slow and the C240 is a lot worse, so you're not smoaking anything... well, by the way you speak and think, you HAVE to be smoking something.
btw, your ghetto cold air intake ain't giving you the 21hp that you're down. I'd say it'll give you 2hp and that's being generous, you may even be losing hp with that ghetto setup.
2005 C240:
168hp @ 5700RPM
177lb-ft @ 4700RPM
2005 C230:
189hp @ 5800RPM
192lb-ft @ 3500RPM
if you can't read or can't understand those figures (which I'm pretty sure you can't), the C230 has more torque at a lower RPM and 21hp more than your C240.
also, MBUSA states the 2005 C230 0-60 at 7.5seconds and many reviewers have gotten it to 7.1. MBUSA states the 2005 C240's 0-60 at 8.7seconds. since you know nothing about cars, 1.2seconds is a lot of damn time. the C230 is damn slow and the C240 is a lot worse, so you're not smoaking anything... well, by the way you speak and think, you HAVE to be smoking something.
btw, your ghetto cold air intake ain't giving you the 21hp that you're down. I'd say it'll give you 2hp and that's being generous, you may even be losing hp with that ghetto setup.
Net power 215 hp @ 5,600 rpm
Net torque 229 lb-ft @ 3,000 - 4,800 rpm
Too bad it's lugging around 5,000 pounds.
06-01-2007, 06:34 PM
#96
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal, Irvine
Posts: 3,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stage 2 C7 A6, QX60
06-01-2007, 07:57 PM
#99
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 5,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS300
06-01-2007, 10:03 PM
#100
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
c24
the c240 is slow and is not great to race. however, you can beat a maxima, focus, and an accord. i have raced my c240 a bunch of times, they are not that great. if you race a new 2.0 a4's you can keep up with them in speeds above 80 mph. but other than these cars, you are really limiited to slow cars
