WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FairFax, Virginia
WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
I read many old posts but still can't understand.
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
Excuse my ignorant but I want to learn
I use the touch shift when I can and I feel that it is good with out the clutch to wrestle with, Our touch ****f is nowhere like the the one i had on the Orange Red 1973 VW Beetle back in college day. That is to say ours is really good
Peace
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
Excuse my ignorant but I want to learn
I use the touch shift when I can and I feel that it is good with out the clutch to wrestle with, Our touch ****f is nowhere like the the one i had on the Orange Red 1973 VW Beetle back in college day. That is to say ours is really good
Peace
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH
2008 VW GTI
Touchshift is not the same as in race cars. Touchshift is an automatic transmission, race cars have a manual trans with a "robotic" shifter.
Automatic trans robs more power from the engine. Manual trans gives the driver more control of the timing of the shifts. The automatic has a delay between the time you nudge the lever to the time the gear is changed. Touchshift doesn't really do anything that older automatics couldn't do in terms of manually overriding the gear changes. It's just a little easier now. These manually shifting automatics are just a marketing ploy to get sports car people excited about automatic transmissions.
Automatic trans robs more power from the engine. Manual trans gives the driver more control of the timing of the shifts. The automatic has a delay between the time you nudge the lever to the time the gear is changed. Touchshift doesn't really do anything that older automatics couldn't do in terms of manually overriding the gear changes. It's just a little easier now. These manually shifting automatics are just a marketing ploy to get sports car people excited about automatic transmissions.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 8,189
Likes: 1
From: SF
2007 VW GTI
avlis is correct.
to add to his post, the touchshift transmission actually does not even change gears. you have no direct input as to when the car changes gears. what it allows you to do, according to the owner's manual, is select a RANGE of gears in which the automatic tranny operates in. when you "shift" left, you take the range of gears from 1-5 to 1-4, and the automatic transmission then decides (if it's safe to do so) to switch to 4th gear.
this is why when you upshift, it doesn't automatically change gears. it simply increases the range of gears the automatic can choose from.
the manual transmission is totally different, as the driver has direct control of when and what gear to shift to.
to add to his post, the touchshift transmission actually does not even change gears. you have no direct input as to when the car changes gears. what it allows you to do, according to the owner's manual, is select a RANGE of gears in which the automatic tranny operates in. when you "shift" left, you take the range of gears from 1-5 to 1-4, and the automatic transmission then decides (if it's safe to do so) to switch to 4th gear.
this is why when you upshift, it doesn't automatically change gears. it simply increases the range of gears the automatic can choose from.
the manual transmission is totally different, as the driver has direct control of when and what gear to shift to.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Re: WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
Originally posted by Benzer
I read many old posts but still can't understand.
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
I read many old posts but still can't understand.
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
An automatic transmission uses something called a torque converter. This is a fluid coupling device that allows the engine to spin somewhat independently of the transmission. If the engine is turning slowly there is very little torque passed through the torque converter (and keeping a foot on the brake allows the engine to spin while the wheels stay stopped). When the accelerator is pressed the engine speeds up and pumps more fluid into the torque converter, allowing it to transmit more torque to the wheels.
True "auto shifting manual" transmissions such as in race cars and some road car systems (BMW's) use a clutch to disengage the engine from the transmission. The reason why a clutch-type system is considered better is that there is some power loss associated with a torque converter. (Although at low speeds modern torque converters can deliver torque more efficiently at high engine speeds and low transmission speeds - which is why an automatic usually launches better from a dead stop.)
Cheers, BT
Last edited by trench; Oct 28, 2002 at 03:47 PM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by avlis
Automatic trans robs more power from the engine. Manual trans gives the driver more control of the timing of the shifts. The automatic has a delay between the time you nudge the lever to the time the gear is changed. Touchshift doesn't really do anything that older automatics couldn't do in terms of manually overriding the gear changes.
Automatic trans robs more power from the engine. Manual trans gives the driver more control of the timing of the shifts. The automatic has a delay between the time you nudge the lever to the time the gear is changed. Touchshift doesn't really do anything that older automatics couldn't do in terms of manually overriding the gear changes.
If you want to shift yourself, get a manual, its way more fun and has a better response (unless you can get a Ferrari with a true F1 style trans)
Admin Alumni
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 19
See Garage
"WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???"
Well, ask this question on any of the other forums and you'll get blank stares. SOME consider the Manual to be better than Touch Shift on this forum, but certainly not all...
Well, ask this question on any of the other forums and you'll get blank stares. SOME consider the Manual to be better than Touch Shift on this forum, but certainly not all...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, Ca
2003 Citron Green C230KMT
Re: WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
Originally posted by Benzer
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
Is the touchshift the same as what race cars are using now aday.
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
The SL55, although it has F1-like fingertip shifters, uses a transmission with a torque converter, so it is still an automatic transmission. The AMG modified Touchshift transmission does feature torque converter lockup - which minimizes the power lost through the torque converter.
Although certain transmissions are called "clutchless," this type of transmission still uses a clutch - it's just operated hydraulically by the car's transmission when told to shift and not by the driver via a pedal. BMW's SMG (sequential manual gearbox) is such a transmission - the computer controlling the transmission even blips the throttle to match revs on downshifts.
Cheers, BT
Although certain transmissions are called "clutchless," this type of transmission still uses a clutch - it's just operated hydraulically by the car's transmission when told to shift and not by the driver via a pedal. BMW's SMG (sequential manual gearbox) is such a transmission - the computer controlling the transmission even blips the throttle to match revs on downshifts.
Cheers, BT
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, Ca
2003 Citron Green C230KMT
i see! so the SL55 would do better if it had a truely clutchless trans? you would think that MB would atleast offer that option in NA to enthusiasts w. the $$$. dont they offer a clutchless manual or even a manual w/ clutch trans in Europe?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by CitronC230K_03
i see! so the SL55 would do better if it had a truely clutchless trans? you would think that MB would atleast offer that option in NA to enthusiasts w. the $$$. dont they offer a clutchless manual or even a manual w/ clutch trans in Europe?
i see! so the SL55 would do better if it had a truely clutchless trans? you would think that MB would atleast offer that option in NA to enthusiasts w. the $$$. dont they offer a clutchless manual or even a manual w/ clutch trans in Europe?
In Formula One they pretty much have to use computer controlled transmissions to prevent the driver from blowing up a super-expensive motor by missing a shift. For the SL55 they get around the fact that some power is lost to an automatic by simply having a ridiculous amount of power to begin with. For BMW, the SMG transmissions although technologically cool are still mostly a marketing tool (as avlis mentioned), as most drivers won't be utilizing the superior characteristics of the transmission in day to day driving. In fact, the average driver could probably drive a C32 Touchshift better than a BMW M3 equipped with either the SMG or a standard manual.
Cheers, BT
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 2
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Re: WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
Originally posted by Benzer
WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
WHy is the Manny considered BETTER than the Touch Shift ???
In winding mountain roads it's great because you don't lose RPM when you let go of the gas on tight turns and you want to punch it coming out of the turn. Yes you can do that with an automatic, just not predictable like a manual is. The touchshift doesn't always do what you want, something that would scare me on mountain road with a 2000' vertical drop on one side and a granite wall on the other. Also if you are a more sophisticated driver, you can induce oversteer (kick out the tail) with the clutch while downshifting in a turn and using the clutch to swing out the rear, this is key as most "sports cars" have a hand brake to do the same thing, the Coupe doesn't. Now don't get me wrong, this may account for less than 1% of my driving, but it's the 1% that makes driving a sport, not just transportation.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
Originally posted by trench
They don't have the option of a true sequential gearbox in Europe either.
In Formula One they pretty much have to use computer controlled transmissions to prevent the driver from blowing up a super-expensive motor by missing a shift. For the SL55 they get around the fact that some power is lost to an automatic by simply having a ridiculous amount of power to begin with. For BMW, the SMG transmissions although technologically cool are still mostly a marketing tool (as avlis mentioned), as most drivers won't be utilizing the superior characteristics of the transmission in day to day driving. In fact, the average driver could probably drive a C32 Touchshift better than a BMW M3 equipped with either the SMG or a standard manual.
Cheers, BT
They don't have the option of a true sequential gearbox in Europe either.
In Formula One they pretty much have to use computer controlled transmissions to prevent the driver from blowing up a super-expensive motor by missing a shift. For the SL55 they get around the fact that some power is lost to an automatic by simply having a ridiculous amount of power to begin with. For BMW, the SMG transmissions although technologically cool are still mostly a marketing tool (as avlis mentioned), as most drivers won't be utilizing the superior characteristics of the transmission in day to day driving. In fact, the average driver could probably drive a C32 Touchshift better than a BMW M3 equipped with either the SMG or a standard manual.
Cheers, BT
my point is that whether people like it or not, smg is probably not going away nor is it really just marketing. i understand if people don't like it though.
Last edited by young; Oct 28, 2002 at 08:01 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by young
what about the rumors that all the M series cars will lose manual trannies in favor of the SMG?
my point is that whether people like it or not, smg is probably not going away nor is it really just marketing. i understand if people don't like it though.
what about the rumors that all the M series cars will lose manual trannies in favor of the SMG?
my point is that whether people like it or not, smg is probably not going away nor is it really just marketing. i understand if people don't like it though.
If comparing a regular automatic transmission to a SMG-type one, the SMG is indeed technologically superior (and more expensive) but the overall benefits are rather minimal, hence marketing. Since the SMG can also mimic the function of a fully automatic transmission it allows the car maker to only have to put one transmission into a car - should be a good savings from a manufacturing point of view. Purists get a "manual" with no clutch pedal - while the lazy driver can let the car shift the gears.
Cheers, BT
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
Originally posted by trench
My guess is for the same reason F1-cars use them - to prevent engine blow-ups with a bad shift. Weren't the newer M3s having problems with people wrecking the motors with bad shifts?
My guess is for the same reason F1-cars use them - to prevent engine blow-ups with a bad shift. Weren't the newer M3s having problems with people wrecking the motors with bad shifts?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 3
From: Ashburn, VA
'19 GLC 300, '19 TM3SR+
Originally posted by young
i think that's where it's coming from. the initial letter sent out by bmw seems to basically say that people didn't know how to shift properly. smg would help alleviate poor driving skills.
i think that's where it's coming from. the initial letter sent out by bmw seems to basically say that people didn't know how to shift properly. smg would help alleviate poor driving skills.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2002 C230 Coupe Black/Charcoal C5 C7 Auto
I read a pretty good article on SMG (6spd one on new M3) and it is soooo complicated to 'setup' that a manual is easier to drive. On the other hand alot if not all race cars (included American drag cars) have racing automatic trannies now aday (not to be confused with our slushboxes). but for street racers nothing beats a manny i admit. If i gether enough money for 2nd car it'll be manny for sure. And i got to say after 1200miles i start playing with the touch shift and holy$**** it LAGs and unpredictable. Audi tiptronic is sooo much better IMO (same tranny on Porsche Boxter).
I guess i'll play around abit more but one time i was on HWY and need to punch it so i pulled to left and held 2 sec at about 55-60mph i think it dropped to 2nd which put the car in red about 500rpm! scared the crapped outta me. I thought it would put it in 'optimal gear'......weird.
I guess i'll play around abit more but one time i was on HWY and need to punch it so i pulled to left and held 2 sec at about 55-60mph i think it dropped to 2nd which put the car in red about 500rpm! scared the crapped outta me. I thought it would put it in 'optimal gear'......weird.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
M3
Originally posted by trench
Weren't the newer M3s having problems with people wrecking the motors with bad shifts?
Weren't the newer M3s having problems with people wrecking the motors with bad shifts?
http://members.roadfly.org/jason/m3engines.htm
...has the engine failure been linked to owner abuse. That is not for lack of the dealers trying to blame the drivers. But about half the recent failures are in SMG II (Sequential Manual Gearbox, version 2)cars, and these cars are programmed not to over-rev. Some do, however, another design flaw.
There are now 105 M3 engine failures (the latest 5 are being added to Jason's list once the dealers confirm catastrophic engine beraing failure).
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
C32 AMG
Originally posted by trench
If comparing a regular automatic transmission to a SMG-type one, the SMG is indeed technologically superior (and more expensive)
If comparing a regular automatic transmission to a SMG-type one, the SMG is indeed technologically superior (and more expensive)
I've never driven a touchshift car, but the AMG speedshift system is better than Audi/Porsche Tiptronic or BMW steptronic. The 1st to 2nd shift under full throttle feels very quick for an auto.
On the other hand, the SMG M3 I drove was great. The only flaw is that you cannot launch the car very hard from a standstill even when using launch control. I could only muster something like 2k rpm before "dropping" the clutch. The other element is that if you don't care about on-track perfection (perfect downshifts, never missing a gear) then it is not as fun as a regular 6-speed.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
Originally posted by JustinTRW
I've never driven a touchshift car, but the AMG speedshift system is better than Audi/Porsche Tiptronic or BMW steptronic. The 1st to 2nd shift under full throttle feels very quick for an auto..
I've never driven a touchshift car, but the AMG speedshift system is better than Audi/Porsche Tiptronic or BMW steptronic. The 1st to 2nd shift under full throttle feels very quick for an auto..
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
C32 AMG
Buellwinkle,
With speedshift I can choose the gear I want and hold it until redline, it works as well as you can expect an auto to. You use those rally techniques? I don't have a manual tranny to play with at home, so I can barely rev-match precisely when flying into a turn when I get the chance. Does the lack of a "hand" brake annoy you? Well, at least it is a savior from abusing your car in that way.
Young, let me tell you one experience. I was accelerating hard in D mode and lifted at about 5k rpm. The tranny held it there forever until I was freaked out and tapped the throttle gently three or four times. Finally it upshifted. When it knows you want aggressive mapping, it gives it to you. Keep in mind of course, that you can make it do this everytime by manually selecting a gear.
With speedshift I can choose the gear I want and hold it until redline, it works as well as you can expect an auto to. You use those rally techniques? I don't have a manual tranny to play with at home, so I can barely rev-match precisely when flying into a turn when I get the chance. Does the lack of a "hand" brake annoy you? Well, at least it is a savior from abusing your car in that way.
Originally posted by young
the touchshift is much better than the bmw craptronic...
the touchshift is much better than the bmw craptronic...
Last edited by JustinTRW; Oct 28, 2002 at 10:19 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2002 C230 Coupe Black/Charcoal C5 C7 Auto
Originally posted by JustinTRW
Actually, the SMG system costs BMW less to build than their regular 6-speed. They charge $2400 to recover development costs.
I've never driven a touchshift car, but the AMG speedshift system is better than Audi/Porsche Tiptronic or BMW steptronic. The 1st to 2nd shift under full throttle feels very quick for an auto.
Actually, the SMG system costs BMW less to build than their regular 6-speed. They charge $2400 to recover development costs.
I've never driven a touchshift car, but the AMG speedshift system is better than Audi/Porsche Tiptronic or BMW steptronic. The 1st to 2nd shift under full throttle feels very quick for an auto.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 4
From: San Diego, CA
C32 AMG
Originally posted by tberry
i dont think u can compare AMG speedshift to regular tiptronic and steptronic. Since the speedshift is higher end it should be more compared to the new CVT or S4 tiptronic (which stated to have user programable) and to SMG II. According to BMW you can do 5k rpm launches with SMG II....up to like 20 times over its life.........and it wont let you do certain things for like hours after that.........again very complicated system.
i dont think u can compare AMG speedshift to regular tiptronic and steptronic. Since the speedshift is higher end it should be more compared to the new CVT or S4 tiptronic (which stated to have user programable) and to SMG II. According to BMW you can do 5k rpm launches with SMG II....up to like 20 times over its life.........and it wont let you do certain things for like hours after that.........again very complicated system.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by JustinTRW
Actually, the SMG system costs BMW less to build than their regular 6-speed. They charge $2400 to recover development costs.
Actually, the SMG system costs BMW less to build than their regular 6-speed. They charge $2400 to recover development costs.
.- BT
