C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

2002 C230K/6sp(2.3l) VS 2003 C230/6sp(1.8l)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-27-2007, 04:39 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
BUB-010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-benz C230 Kompressor Sport Coupe
2002 C230K/6sp(2.3l) VS 2003 C230/6sp(1.8l)

How much is the difference between the accelarions 0-60/mph or 0-100/km/h?
What are the top speeds?
Old 09-27-2007, 07:49 AM
  #2  
Member
 
ushawk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I downgraded to a VW, it's still German though
I'm pretty sure all the US cars are limited at 130 mph. I know mine is limited to 130. I haven't timed the 0-60. My 2003 feels faster than a 2002, but that is what my Butt Dyno tells me. Not sure in reality. You can get you a Butt Dyno from KaleCo Auto though.

Butt Dyno


$399.95
2 Units in Stock

Just install a great mod like a cold air intake? Electric supercharger? Big Muffler? Magnetic fuel line ionizer? Awesome wing? Are you getting no respect from your friends for your newly found power? As we all know, these are high end and sophisticated modifications. Some may be TOO sophisticated to actually show up on a traditional dyno. So here we have: The Butt Dyno. Simply place it in the seat, and drive fast, weaving in and out of traffic. (On a race course, of course.) Now you can tell your friends with confidence "That oil-saturated air filter gave me 20 horses!"
Old 09-27-2007, 08:14 AM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
BUB-010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-benz C230 Kompressor Sport Coupe
as I Know european 2.3 K takes 7.4 and 1.8k takes 8.1 0-100km/h
Old 09-28-2007, 03:13 AM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
BUB-010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-benz C230 Kompressor Sport Coupe
Please seee this site is correct?

according to this site 2002 ruleeessss

http://www.auto123.com/en/used/compa...ID2=1034000801
Old 09-28-2007, 03:48 AM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
BUB-010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-benz C230 Kompressor Sport Coupe
Has anyone checked if the 2002 C230 has electronicaly limited speed on 130mph? In canada its not limited and it is 140mph but the 2003 year model has limited top speed on 130mph.
Old 09-28-2007, 06:25 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230K Coupe/Orion/C4/C5/CD/AMG Spoiler/V60/TeleAid, 2 MGB's
The US version of the 2002 C230k Coupe (2.3 liter M111) is limited to 130 (been there...shhh).

The biggest differences are tourque curve - the 2002 has tons more torque in the low end....and weight - the 1.8 in the 03-05 (1.8 liter M271) Coupe is 143 pounds lighter, and rolls slightly less as a result.

The reason the 1.8 "feels" faster is because the car has less front end weight, resulting in a more nimble feel. Bone stock, the performance specs of these cars are so identical, the only difference at the end of the day (and the END of a straight-line quarter mile) might be driver related. But then, these cars aren't made for drag racing.

The 2.3 might be a little faster off the line (torque), but the 1.8 pulls well above 3000 RPM. The 2.3 is also a tried and true design, in that the basic engine block and bottom end have been in the Mercedes family since 1953....there's something to be said about longevity.

These opinions are my own - tested by my own seat of the pants in my own car (and a friend's 2004) - on a closed circuit. Please feel free to factually refute these opinions if you so desire...but be prepared to prove your own.
Old 09-28-2007, 11:35 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SeaCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 C230K, 2013 BMW 328, 2015 BMW X5
Don't care about proving my input. However, I have a 2.3L with a pulley, and there is NO comparison to a 1.8L. Run circles around them.

E
Old 09-28-2007, 12:15 PM
  #8  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Originally Posted by emrliquidlife
Don't care about proving my input. However, I have a 2.3L with a pulley, and there is NO comparison to a 1.8L. Run circles around them.
Yes, that's the real difference - you add a pulley to an M111, and suddenly, it grows *****.

Though I don't have facts to prove that (well, neither did Rick, but that's a different subject).
Old 09-29-2007, 04:42 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
spyderpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'02 CL203 M111
yeah! M111 hidden powa!
I guess because it is running a lot under its capability ???
Old 09-29-2007, 04:48 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
spyderpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'02 CL203 M111
Originally Posted by Rick
The US version of the 2002 C230k Coupe (2.3 liter M111) is limited to 130 (been there...shhh).
isn't there a little button under the accelerator when u hit all the way then u push a little more on that button that disable the speed limit?... never tried though....
Old 10-01-2007, 02:25 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
maryjcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 E350
Originally Posted by Rick
The biggest differences are tourque curve - the 2002 has tons more torque in the low end....and weight - the 1.8 in the 03-05 (1.8 liter M271) Coupe is 143 pounds lighter, and rolls slightly less as a result.
I am sure the 1.8 weighs less, but 143 pounds less on a 4 cylinder engine????? Is one made of lead and the other of aluminum foil?

That sounds a little high, to say the least. Where did you get that figure from? My numbers show that the '03 coupe (M271) is about 50lbs lighter than the '02 coupe (M111), so unless there was a large weight change on some other part of the '02 that would account for closing the gap between your 143 lb figure and the actual weight difference between the two model years, it would seem that the 271 is lighter, but not 143 lbs lighter.

To me, if you've ever had an engine out of a car, 143 lbs is the difference between a four cylinder and a (lightweight) eight cylinder, not the difference in weight between two four cylinder engines.

TIA.

Last edited by maryjcl; 10-01-2007 at 02:44 PM.
Old 10-02-2007, 04:33 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: So. Oregon Coast
Posts: 6,791
Received 113 Likes on 103 Posts
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
Cool

Originally Posted by tommy
Yes, that's the real difference - you add a pulley to an M111, and suddenly, it grows *****.

Though I don't have facts to prove that (well, neither did Rick, but that's a different subject).
Is THAT what those are? Damn I been wondering...they appeared shortly after installing the pulley and became even further engorged after the install of the header, Remus, and free flow cat...
when I tried the remove them the car wouldn't run correctly, and the exhaust note changed to a high pitched squeal so I've left them alone.

Wish I had some PShop skills here....

Last edited by C230 Sport Coup; 10-02-2007 at 04:36 PM.
Old 10-02-2007, 04:34 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: So. Oregon Coast
Posts: 6,791
Received 113 Likes on 103 Posts
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort (What the heck, it gets 38 mpg!)
Originally Posted by spyderpig
isn't there a little button under the accelerator when u hit all the way then u push a little more on that button that disable the speed limit?... never tried though....
No.
Thats the kickdown switch for the auto tranny, which after 2002 became
a placebo switch doesn't do anything according to the service dvd.
Old 10-03-2007, 02:14 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
spyderpig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'02 CL203 M111
Originally Posted by C230 Sport Coup
No.
Thats the kickdown switch for the auto tranny, which after 2002 became
a placebo switch doesn't do anything according to the service dvd.
So that thing on my car has no function then ! Does anything work on my car? exept the AVIC dvd nav ??? lol sorry

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: 2002 C230K/6sp(2.3l) VS 2003 C230/6sp(1.8l)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.