C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

STAGGERED wheel set-up on the 4MATIC - All you want to know

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #26  
C24owner's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,769
Likes: 0
From: NJ
'08 E550 4Matic
It's really not a good idea to run staggered on an AWD car. Ideally you want the front and back to rotate at the same speed. You'll never be able to achieve that with a staggered setup, you can come close by running different tires on the back. Use this tire calculator to find out what tires to use.

The awd system will work just fine with a staggered setup but you risk damaging the differential in the long run.
__________________
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:33 AM
  #27  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
from what i read, running a staggered setup is generally bad for awd cars because it causes the center differential to run a different speeds for extended period of time. Causing it to burn out more quickly.

I think it should be ok long as you make sure the outer diameter of the tires are within the factory specs.

But its one of those things, why would you want to force your car to do something it wasn't intended to do without any real benefit and run the risk of having large repair bills?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #28  
B189s's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Jakarta
1996 MB E320 & 2010 Nissan Elgrand
Interesting thread!

I've always been curious about the answer to this. I mean Those Porsche 4Ses run staggered setup
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #29  
AMGTestDriverNJ's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 2
From: Wyckoff, New Jersey & Alphabet City NYC
86 190E 2.3-16v, 92 500E, 03 CL55 AMG, 08 E3504M Brabus
in accordance with that comment, check out the W204 section of this post. A guy from canada told me their C class 4matics come with a staggered wheel setup? What do you guys think of that? Just want to counter balance as I am in the process of buying another set of, you guessed it, staggered wheels. I just want to make sure I'm getting the best info out there. Have a look at what he said here is the link.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w204/267282-staggered-vs-4matic-whats-real-story.html
please post your thoughts.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:48 AM
  #30  
B189s's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Jakarta
1996 MB E320 & 2010 Nissan Elgrand
Originally Posted by AMGTestDriverNJ
in accordance with that comment, check out the W204 section of this post. A guy from canada told me their C class 4matics come with a staggered wheel setup? What do you guys think of that? Just want to counter balance as I am in the process of buying another set of, you guessed it, staggered wheels. I just want to make sure I'm getting the best info out there. Have a look at what he said here is the link.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=267282
please post your thoughts.
Hmm I didn't even know if W204 4-Matic cars come with staggered setup here in Canada

I'll ask around in our local forum
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #31  
andy_meng1024's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 2
From: Madison WI
2003 SL55, 2010 C63
Been using staggered tires for almost 3 years with no problem here. 235/35/19 and 275/30/19 are less than 0.1% different which is almost negligible tho.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 03:34 AM
  #32  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
staggered tires has no issues. as long as they are within 2% of the overall diameter.

you all worry too much.

new C300/350 4-matic sport all comes with staggered 17" tires
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:25 AM
  #33  
HellsAngel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 1
From: France, Lebanon
03 c320 coupe
does staggered setup have a remarquable effect on performance ?
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #34  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
It's all a matter of rolling circumference of tyres. As long as they are reasonably matched you will have no issues at all.

The TCU/TCM & ESP will mess you around long before any damage could be done by over running the differentials.

So it's an issue of tyre matching
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #35  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by HellsAngel
does staggered setup have a remarquable effect on performance ?
Better turn in on a Porsche. On our somewhat pedestrian Mercs I doubt it. See what others think.

Much of the modding done by people on this forum is for aesthetic appeal - never mind what people say or how much they spend. And that's fine - it's all good fun.

Some of the suspension set ups I've seen, which must have cost a bomb, would have made high speed stability worse than standard the way they've been set up. See many modded vehicles in pics on the forum with the tail hunkered down and the nose riding high - looks great but screws up the aerodynamics of the vehicle & encourages excess air under the vehicle that will mess big time with high speed stability. Splinter's car has the right attitude for good overall handling. Plenty of negative camber & a good nose down attitude. Some even more so = good

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 29, 2008 at 09:05 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #36  
PA_Pete's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 273
Likes: 6
From: SE PA
2001 C320
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
It's all a matter of rolling circumference of tyres. As long as they are reasonably matched you will have no issues at all.

The TCU/TCM & ESP will mess you around long before any damage could be done by over running the differentials.

So it's an issue of tyre matching
True. As long as the diameters are all the same or very very very close, I think you should be alright. Also, I couldn't see an all-wheel drive car coming with a space saver spare (you know, them little tiny things), I believe they require a full sized spare, again, you want equals sizes all the way around. Another thing with you all wheel drive cars, make sure they get towed on a flat bed! As far as a staggered set up on a rear-wheel drive car goes, I always thought that was for more tire on the ground for more traction off of launches? At least that's how I always did it with my old muscle cars.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #37  
HellsAngel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 1
From: France, Lebanon
03 c320 coupe
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
Better turn in on a Porsche. On our somewhat pedestrian Mercs I doubt it. See what others think.

Much of the modding done by people on this forum is for aesthetic appeal - never mind what people say or how much they spend. And that's fine - it's all good fun.

Some of the suspension set ups I've seen, which must have cost a bomb, would have made high speed stability worse than standard the way they've been set up. See many modded vehicles in pics on the forum with the tail hunkered down and the nose riding high - looks great but screws up the aerodynamics of the vehicle & encourages excess air under the vehicle that will mess big time with high speed stability. Splinter's car has the right attitude for good overall handling. Plenty of negative camber & a good nose down attitude. Some even more so = good


so, staggered setup on a FWD will just improve the look ??? its like having spacers thats all
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:01 AM
  #38  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by HellsAngel
so, staggered setup on a FWD will just improve the look ??? its like having spacers thats all
I see very little in favour of staggered on an AWD Benz. We are not talking about a Veyron here we are talking about a passenger sedan with moderate power.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #39  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by PA_Pete
I always thought that was for more tire on the ground for more traction off of launches? At least that's how I always did it with my old muscle cars.
Old muscle cars were crap. They had crap suspension and all of them axle tramped to a greater or lesser degree. Frequently it paid to spin the rears to get away from tramp.

Re launches & handling vs. tyre size - It's all about pressure per specific size contact patch - there is an optimum for a specific compound. Take the contact patch too large with insufficient pressure & you loose out.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #40  
TruTaing's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 22
From: Seattle
w203 m112
Glyn - Thanks for the insightful comments. Im raising the rear of my car to be more even w/ my front. :x I wish I could lower the front smore so I didn't have to raise the rear so much That neg camber has owned my rear tires! :P
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #41  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by TruTaing
Glyn - Thanks for the insightful comments. Im raising the rear of my car to be more even w/ my front. :x I wish I could lower the front smore so I didn't have to raise the rear so much That neg camber has owned my rear tires! :P
Oops Tru - I hope I'm not going to cause a whole rash of people raising rears & lowering fronts. A question was posed and I answered it as honestly as I know how from my experience. I'm about to go to a staggered set up on my car but I know I'm doing it for cosmetic reasons. I'm not expecting any huge differences. Regarding attitude - Benz went to a lot of trouble to get the CD down to .27 & that requires nose down - why mess it up? The place you need the negative camber is the front.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 29, 2008 at 02:48 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #42  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally Posted by TruTaing
Glyn - Thanks for the insightful comments. Im raising the rear of my car to be more even w/ my front. :x I wish I could lower the front smore so I didn't have to raise the rear so much That neg camber has owned my rear tires! :P
LOL...you can have the same ride height as I do.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #43  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
Old muscle cars were crap. They had crap suspension and all of them axle tramped to a greater or lesser degree. Frequently it paid to spin the rears to get away from tramp.

Re launches & handling vs. tyre size - It's all about pressure per specific size contact patch - there is an optimum for a specific compound. Take the contact patch too large with insufficient pressure & you loose out.
yup, bigger contact patch = more traction, but retards the response. smaller contact patch = less traction, but with great turn in.

on 4wd car you can run staggered as long as diameter stays within acceptable variance. on most 4wd car where they're Front biased there's no real advantage in going staggered. on the 4-matic I think 60% of the torque is still diverted to the rear, so with staggered you could still improve the traction off the line.

however running non-staggered setup gives you the most neutral turn in response even on RWD cars.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:36 PM
  #44  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
But if the contact patch is too big with insufficient down pressure you will damage traction & develop wheelspin. Bigger is not always better - you reach a limit.

I'm going to use a bad example because we are talking FWD & have weight transfer issues to consider - but Honda's high performance models are works of art at specifying tyres correctly. They have their pressure per contact patch worked out perfectly. Over tyre them & you ruin everything

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 29, 2008 at 04:42 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #45  
TruTaing's Avatar
Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 22
From: Seattle
w203 m112
Originally Posted by FrankW
LOL...you can have the same ride height as I do.
Yours looks good... I mean you did get some like 8 page feature on your car w/ that ride height. :P I will imitate your ride height any day!
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #46  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
But if the contact patch is too big with insufficient down pressure you will damage traction & develop wheelspin. Bigger is not always better - you reach a limit.
yes, but i don't think any modern car will have that problem.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #47  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by FrankW
yes, but i don't think any modern car will have that problem.
As they get lighter it becomes more and more of a problem. See my comments on Honda
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #48  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I have a better example because it's light, RWD & near perfect handling & traction.
The Lotus Exige - don't even think of putting bigger tyres on that or you will destroy both traction & handling.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #49  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
And remember that modern vehicles are not only going lighter & lighter but also looking to cutting cd for fuel consumption reasons. The same reason that they dont' generate much downforce - fuel consumption.. If F1 scrapped ground effects & wings they would not be able to make good use of their tyres - not enough downward pressure.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #50  
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Super Moderator
MBWorld Ambassador

 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 192
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by FrankW
yes, but i don't think any modern car will have that problem.
I certainly don't want to argue with Frank on his birthday, but this is very much an issue on modern cars - see my justification above. Michelin have some fascinating research in this regard & some good video material that they share with race teams that they support around the world. Don't over tyre your cars. Big enough is big enough from a pressure per contact patch ratio alone to say the least of messing with unsprung weight & damping, turn in etc. If you are doing it purely for aesthetics then that's fine as long as you accept that you could be taking the vehicle backwards from an overall handling perspective. Don't raise the issue of traction control either. It can only do as well as the tyre fundamentals allow.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 29, 2008 at 07:16 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE