C320 Vs. C230K
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Champaign, Illinois
C- 230 Kompressor,C2,C7,Black,JL sub,A/D/S/ amps,Alpine hu and changer
As much as I love this car , better than any car I have owned, this stereo is kinda weak, so after a few months I replaced it, did I mention it has a TAPE DECK .
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
C320 Coupe
The sound system is ok, It is just not audiophile quality. The Bose system in the MB has more bass than the Bose systems in my Acura. The first mod in my Acura was a 10" sub and amp, and that is all the factory stereo needed.
Bose just makes bright, low bass systems. Thats seems to be the preference of the auto makers, not sure why.
The European Audio 10 CD is suppose to be much better. It is an MB head unit made by Becker. It is about $650 new from www.autoclass.net. You will loose some of the AM stations, but will have more bass, in-dash CD, and steering wheel controls.
The other mod you will probably want is AMG sway bars. About $200 dollars from the dealer. Should negotiate them in with the deal.
Bose just makes bright, low bass systems. Thats seems to be the preference of the auto makers, not sure why.
The European Audio 10 CD is suppose to be much better. It is an MB head unit made by Becker. It is about $650 new from www.autoclass.net. You will loose some of the AM stations, but will have more bass, in-dash CD, and steering wheel controls.
The other mod you will probably want is AMG sway bars. About $200 dollars from the dealer. Should negotiate them in with the deal.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
hey TNblkc230wz, ,so your saying that the bose system is nice, it's the deck that comes with the cars is what makes the sound bad??? is that what you guys are experiencing??? because i was thinking about the navigation system, and i am wondering if that would fix that problem of the tape deck thing...???
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
2003 C230K Sport Coupe, 1986 190E 2.3
The C230 Mod for right now is the Intercooler, it should help the 1.8 more than the 2.3 since the 1.8 has a higher boost. Probably a 10-15 HP increase and you will get rid of the 10 hp loss due to heat soaking. This is the one I am getting as soon as the $500 one comes out or there is another $800 group buy on the Renntech. Also Kleeman is working on a smaller SC pulley for the 1.8. A %10 smaller one should help a little and give a 1-2 lbs of boost increase. The C320 of course has the underdrive pulleys that free up 10-15 hp. I went with the 230 because I like the better fuel economy and hopefully can bring the hp over 200 with an intercooler and maybe the smaller pulley will add about 15hp making it right inline with the 320 motor for $1500 less. Only time will tell. I am enjoying the power increase from the cold weather and the intercooler being properly cooled, due to the cold weather.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
you have a really good point, the only thing i am not too comfortable with, is pushing that 1.8 engine so much, when it's already being pushed hard. freeing up the HP out of the 320 sounds more comforting. but then again, maybe i am just too paranoid.
Admin Alumni
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 19
See Garage
Originally posted by themindfield22
yea, i need to order my car like within 2 - 3 weeks, and i really need to know, ,if i can mod the c320, because i already test drove both (the 230, and 320), and the 320 accelerates with much more ease. i can tell the difference so easily. so that's why it would be real nice if i can get something relativly easy, that would make it a lil faster.
yea, i need to order my car like within 2 - 3 weeks, and i really need to know, ,if i can mod the c320, because i already test drove both (the 230, and 320), and the 320 accelerates with much more ease. i can tell the difference so easily. so that's why it would be real nice if i can get something relativly easy, that would make it a lil faster.
If your comments above are based on driving the C320 SEDAN, then I think I understand where you are going with your remarks.
If you are used to driving the V6 Camaro, and remark that the 3.2L V6 "accelerates with much more ease... i can tell the difference so easily" then I think you want the C320 SEDAN over the SportsCoupe. No dis on the S/C Coupe. I'm just saying that if you liked the V6 in your previous car, the V6 in the Sedan (or the new C320 Coupe) is more equivalent than adjusting to a supercharged 4 cylinder.
This will also clear up some confusion over the Bose audio system... The Bose system in the SEDAN is much BETTER than the Bose in the Coupe (repeating several other opinions here, not just mine).
Underdrive pulleys are available within reasonable costs for the C320 motor. But any other mods cost gobs of $. Modding MBs is not as cheap as modding a Honda.
Granted, there is alot more tunability in the S/C motor than in the V6. But IMO, putting a pulley on a 194 HP car to bring it to 225 HP is more complicated than tinkering with a C320 sedan which is already within 10 HP of the target. A K&N filter could make up some of the deficit (jury is still out on that, as everyone has an opinion but no one has supplied any facts.) A free-er flowing exhaust can probably get the 3.2L to 230HP, but depending on what you buy these can be expensive too.
Just tell us which C320 you drove and that will clear up some confusion.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
well, Mr bob, the one i that i test drove was the c320 coupe, and it had the regular sound system in it. (i didn't like the sound system all that much). and the reason i liked it better, wasn't because the HP difference between the two vehicles was 25 HP, i really didn't think that 25 HP is much. it was just that i felt that i didn't need to step on the gas as hard as i needed with the 230 to make it accelerate nicely...that's why i am leaning more towards the 320(coupe), but the icing on the cake would be having the ability to kick the horse power up to like 230-250???
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 756
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Originally posted by themindfield22
...that's why i am leaning more towards the 320(coupe), but the icing on the cake would be having the ability to kick the horse power up to like 230-250???
...that's why i am leaning more towards the 320(coupe), but the icing on the cake would be having the ability to kick the horse power up to like 230-250???
Admin Alumni
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 19
See Garage
Originally posted by themindfield22
well, Mr bob, the one i that i test drove was the c320 coupe, and it had the regular sound system in it. (i didn't like the sound system all that much). and the reason i liked it better, wasn't because the HP difference between the two vehicles was 25 HP, i really didn't think that 25 HP is much. it was just that i felt that i didn't need to step on the gas as hard as i needed with the 230 to make it accelerate nicely...that's why i am leaning more towards the 320(coupe), but the icing on the cake would be having the ability to kick the horse power up to like 230-250???
well, Mr bob, the one i that i test drove was the c320 coupe, and it had the regular sound system in it. (i didn't like the sound system all that much). and the reason i liked it better, wasn't because the HP difference between the two vehicles was 25 HP, i really didn't think that 25 HP is much. it was just that i felt that i didn't need to step on the gas as hard as i needed with the 230 to make it accelerate nicely...that's why i am leaning more towards the 320(coupe), but the icing on the cake would be having the ability to kick the horse power up to like 230-250???
Originally posted by viper
I am sure that with some minor ECU tuning and intake manifold changes this goal is readily attainable.
I am sure that with some minor ECU tuning and intake manifold changes this goal is readily attainable.
Last edited by MB-BOB; Jan 30, 2003 at 01:03 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
2003 C230K Sport Coupe, 1986 190E 2.3
To get good acceleration out of the 1.8 you need to be above 3000 RPM. It's torque band is from 3500-4500 RPM. I have not driven a V-6 one so I can't really compare, but the 1.8 accelerates nicely for me even when doing 75 in 6th gear. If I floor it, the car goes quite well up to 100 within a few seconds. Not like a V-8 or anything but definetaly better than your average 4 banger. My wife and I could not really justify the $2500 extra for 25 Hp and less gas mileage. We could swing it but we did not think it was really worth the extra, since an intercooler and a pulley(Kleeman is working on it) can be had for at least $1000 less if not $1500 and get you at least the same power the V-6 has. But I would say drive them both and decide which suits your driving style more.
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
C320 Coupe
Originally posted by themindfield22
hey TNblkc230wz, ,so your saying that the bose system is nice, it's the deck that comes with the cars is what makes the sound bad??? is that what you guys are experiencing??? because i was thinking about the navigation system, and i am wondering if that would fix that problem of the tape deck thing...???
hey TNblkc230wz, ,so your saying that the bose system is nice, it's the deck that comes with the cars is what makes the sound bad??? is that what you guys are experiencing??? because i was thinking about the navigation system, and i am wondering if that would fix that problem of the tape deck thing...???
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
C320 Coupe
Originally posted by mctwin2kman
To get good acceleration out of the 1.8 you need to be above 3000 RPM. It's torque band is from 3500-4500 RPM. I have not driven a V-6 one so I can't really compare, but the 1.8 accelerates nicely for me even when doing 75 in 6th gear. If I floor it, the car goes quite well up to 100 within a few seconds. Not like a V-8 or anything but definetaly better than your average 4 banger. My wife and I could not really justify the $2500 extra for 25 Hp and less gas mileage. We could swing it but we did not think it was really worth the extra, since an intercooler and a pulley(Kleeman is working on it) can be had for at least $1000 less if not $1500 and get you at least the same power the V-6 has. But I would say drive them both and decide which suits your driving style more.
To get good acceleration out of the 1.8 you need to be above 3000 RPM. It's torque band is from 3500-4500 RPM. I have not driven a V-6 one so I can't really compare, but the 1.8 accelerates nicely for me even when doing 75 in 6th gear. If I floor it, the car goes quite well up to 100 within a few seconds. Not like a V-8 or anything but definetaly better than your average 4 banger. My wife and I could not really justify the $2500 extra for 25 Hp and less gas mileage. We could swing it but we did not think it was really worth the extra, since an intercooler and a pulley(Kleeman is working on it) can be had for at least $1000 less if not $1500 and get you at least the same power the V-6 has. But I would say drive them both and decide which suits your driving style more.
I need to check out the Bose in the sedans. They do have a different speaker arangement.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
2010 C300 4matic
Originally posted by TNblkc230wz
I need to check out the Bose in the sedans. They do have a different speaker arangement.
I need to check out the Bose in the sedans. They do have a different speaker arangement.
Admin Alumni
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 19
See Garage
Originally posted by Matt230K
Yeah, I believe the subwoofer in the sedan is in the rear deck and it is also larger.
Yeah, I believe the subwoofer in the sedan is in the rear deck and it is also larger.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally posted by MB-BOB
Not only that, but the sub faces upwards into the rear glass, directly exposed into the cabin. The Coupe's sub is in the back side wall, facing across the car. More important, it has to blast through that solid hatch cover to be heard.
Not only that, but the sub faces upwards into the rear glass, directly exposed into the cabin. The Coupe's sub is in the back side wall, facing across the car. More important, it has to blast through that solid hatch cover to be heard.
I would expect a little more 'thump'
for the extra bucks the bose setup cost.BTW, the AUDIO 10 headunit sucks. Don't waste your money. Apply that towards the COMAND unit.
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally posted by Outland
Doesn't help one damn bit to lower the seats or remove the hatch cover. That sub is just WEAK! Its pathetic. Ive had surround sound speakers that made more bass than that little wuss. I think that overall the BOSE system sound good, but the lack of bass is a major weakness. A lot of people only judge the quality of the sound based on the 'thump'.
I would expect a little more 'thump' for the extra bucks the bose setup cost.
BTW, the AUDIO 10 headunit sucks. Don't waste your money. Apply that towards the COMAND unit.
Doesn't help one damn bit to lower the seats or remove the hatch cover. That sub is just WEAK! Its pathetic. Ive had surround sound speakers that made more bass than that little wuss. I think that overall the BOSE system sound good, but the lack of bass is a major weakness. A lot of people only judge the quality of the sound based on the 'thump'.
I would expect a little more 'thump'
for the extra bucks the bose setup cost.BTW, the AUDIO 10 headunit sucks. Don't waste your money. Apply that towards the COMAND unit.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
2003 C230K Sport Coupe, 1986 190E 2.3
Originally posted by Outland
Doesn't help one damn bit to lower the seats or remove the hatch cover. That sub is just WEAK! Its pathetic. Ive had surround sound speakers that made more bass than that little wuss. I think that overall the BOSE system sound good, but the lack of bass is a major weakness. A lot of people only judge the quality of the sound based on the 'thump'.
I would expect a little more 'thump' for the extra bucks the bose setup cost.
BTW, the AUDIO 10 headunit sucks. Don't waste your money. Apply that towards the COMAND unit.
Doesn't help one damn bit to lower the seats or remove the hatch cover. That sub is just WEAK! Its pathetic. Ive had surround sound speakers that made more bass than that little wuss. I think that overall the BOSE system sound good, but the lack of bass is a major weakness. A lot of people only judge the quality of the sound based on the 'thump'.
I would expect a little more 'thump'
for the extra bucks the bose setup cost.BTW, the AUDIO 10 headunit sucks. Don't waste your money. Apply that towards the COMAND unit.
