C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Red Tiger

gas mileage before and after m271 Kleemann headers

Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #1  
Midnight Koop's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: DC/VA
CL203
gas mileage before and after m271 Kleemann headers

I wanted to get some feedback from all of you who have put kleemann headers on your m271.

I used to get 31-33 highway and 25-27 city before I installed my headers.... now I get 24-27 highway and 19-22 city.

This may be exaggerated because I think I may be driving more aggressively (I've had mine for about 6 months now).... but I did spend a couple of days trying to drive as conservative as possible and I couldn't get anywhere close to the gas mileage I used to.

Have any of you noticed this too?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #2  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
possible....even likely and expected. also, have you gotten a tune on your car since? this may be because your car is running rich and adding in more fuel.....
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:55 PM
  #3  
Midnight Koop's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: DC/VA
CL203
Originally Posted by jturkel
possible....even likely and expected. also, have you gotten a tune on your car since? this may be because your car is running rich and adding in more fuel.....
no tune... but i plan to in november
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #4  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
its very common for cars to run rich after installing headers. this would result in the decreased gas mileage you are experiencing, though no doubt i would probably "get on it" more too after installing power mods....i usually do lol.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 12:45 AM
  #5  
Midnight Koop's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: DC/VA
CL203
Originally Posted by jturkel
its very common for cars to run rich after installing headers. this would result in the decreased gas mileage you are experiencing, though no doubt i would probably "get on it" more too after installing power mods....i usually do lol.
yeah i will... but the soonest LET comes to my area is november... so i have to wait
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 03:17 AM
  #6  
C230 Sport Coup's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 168
From: So. Oregon Coast
C230 Sport Coup + 2006 W164 ML350 + 99 Ford Escort RIP
Your throttle response is likely improved greatly, hence less mileage.
I can eek out 28 mpg if I baby the throttle (M111) but with pulley, headers, and other things, the car wants to GO. Hard to say no!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 05:15 AM
  #7  
jturkel's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 4
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by midnight kompre
yeah i will... but the soonest LET comes to my area is november... so i have to wait
you could always ship our your ECU and they can tune it and ship it back if you are that desperate lol.....i'd probably wait, but you would only see at most a 5-8 or so whp more different i think (i think, i do not know) on a dyno tune for your car.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 06:08 AM
  #8  
TemjinX2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 6
From: Corona, CA
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
More power = less mpg.

I'm sure your ecu is throwing in more fuel in since the headers added more power. I'm sure a ecu tune will give you a more balanced a/f ratio but more then likely you'll still get less mpg then stock.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
Midnight Koop's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
From: DC/VA
CL203
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
More power = less mpg.

I'm sure your ecu is throwing in more fuel in since the headers added more power. I'm sure a ecu tune will give you a more balanced a/f ratio but more then likely you'll still get less mpg then stock.
yeah... i'm not surprised at the result.... i was just curious if the difference in mpg was similar to others who have headers.

and if anyone have headers plus a tune... i'm curious how much mpg they gained back.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #10  
SeaCoupe's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,212
Likes: 8
From: Pasadena, CA
2002 C230K, 2013 BMW 328, 2015 BMW X5
Originally Posted by C230 Sport Coup
Your throttle response is likely improved greatly, hence less mileage.
I can eek out 28 mpg if I baby the throttle (M111) but with pulley, headers, and other things, the car wants to GO. Hard to say no!
psh....31 mpg combined!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #11  
capt_paul's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 37
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
2013 C350 Coupe, 2005 C230K Kleemann Sedan, 2013 GLK350 4matic
On my Pontiac that I had a few years ago I installed headers and got about 5 mpg better mileage. On my C230 with the Kleemann headers, I get about 24-30 mpg avereage mileage but I also get a persistant P0240 code which pisses me off.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #12  
ATL_MB's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong/Charlotte
2010 C63
I installed the Kleeman header about 3 months ago. Mileage is down a bit, but not as much as what you are showing. I went from 28-29 or so highway to 26 on a recent 400 mile trip and from ~20 to ~16 city (these are NOT the mileage from the computer, which is good for *****, but manually calculated; the computer is ALWAYS optimistic by 3-5 MPG).

Just FYI, my car is 2004 manual transmission sedan and I drive 85-90 MPH consistently on the highway and drive it pretty hard around town (which is most of my driving).
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.