Choosing a compact wagon
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
'03 BMW 330i ZHP / '06 Volvo V70R
Choosing a compact wagon
Right now I drive a 1990 190E 2.6. I am doing European Delivery on a 2003 BMW 330i with the new performance package in a few weeks. I plan on keeping my 190E as a car my fiancee can drive or that I can take when the weather is really crappy (it's great in the snow with Blizzaks).
I don't expect, however, the 190E to be in great shape forever. So in 2-3 years we (wife and I) will buy a small wagon to use in trips, bad weather, and to haul stuff when the 330i is too small. For that reason I want a wagon with AWD and an automatic. I want to buy it 2-3 years old, so it would be a new right now.
So here are the contenders
Volvo V70 series (ruled out after driving my parents' new XC last weekend).
Audi A4 Avant 1.8T (ruled out - engine is way too wimpy and car too heavy).
Audi A4 Avant 3.0
MB C240W 4-Matic
MB C320W 4-Matic
BMW 325xiT
VW Passat V6 4-motion
The A4 3.0 worries me because of reliability issues, but it is by far the best bang for the buck. The C240W is a bit on the weak side. The C320W is great but just very expensive. The 325xiT is again a bit in the weak side. The Passat I just haven't driven at all.
So do you guys have any input? Have you driven any of the cars? What do think about cost, reliability, etc. I have been a huge MB fan my whole life and love my 190E (very reliable) but I haven't heard great things lately about MB reliability.
What would you pick given my needs, etc? Just looking for a good car dicussion.
I don't expect, however, the 190E to be in great shape forever. So in 2-3 years we (wife and I) will buy a small wagon to use in trips, bad weather, and to haul stuff when the 330i is too small. For that reason I want a wagon with AWD and an automatic. I want to buy it 2-3 years old, so it would be a new right now.
So here are the contenders
Volvo V70 series (ruled out after driving my parents' new XC last weekend).
Audi A4 Avant 1.8T (ruled out - engine is way too wimpy and car too heavy).
Audi A4 Avant 3.0
MB C240W 4-Matic
MB C320W 4-Matic
BMW 325xiT
VW Passat V6 4-motion
The A4 3.0 worries me because of reliability issues, but it is by far the best bang for the buck. The C240W is a bit on the weak side. The C320W is great but just very expensive. The 325xiT is again a bit in the weak side. The Passat I just haven't driven at all.
So do you guys have any input? Have you driven any of the cars? What do think about cost, reliability, etc. I have been a huge MB fan my whole life and love my 190E (very reliable) but I haven't heard great things lately about MB reliability.
What would you pick given my needs, etc? Just looking for a good car dicussion.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
'03 BMW 330i ZHP / '06 Volvo V70R
Originally posted by gab
just get a used WRX wagon in 2 years time, it will be very cheap and affordable
or consider the new A3
just get a used WRX wagon in 2 years time, it will be very cheap and affordable
or consider the new A3
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Well, you are certainly starting early and things may change by the time you need to act. We leased a new C320wagon (pre-4motion) for its combination of utility and driveability. The VW was more spacious but a bit stolid on the road (even with all the bells and whistles). The A4 3.0 was the closest alternative and there was no signficant difference in price. The BMW was appealing but was not in the running since there were none available in our purchase window.
Overall, we are very pleased with the C320 and our only complaint/repair over the past 9mos. has been a sagging luggage compartment cover. If I had it to do over (and I will in 2-3 years), I would probably make the same decision although I'd consider the 4motion option.
Biggest disappointment: Lack of CD player but I've corrected that.
Overall, we are very pleased with the C320 and our only complaint/repair over the past 9mos. has been a sagging luggage compartment cover. If I had it to do over (and I will in 2-3 years), I would probably make the same decision although I'd consider the 4motion option.
Biggest disappointment: Lack of CD player but I've corrected that.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
'03 BMW 330i ZHP / '06 Volvo V70R
Originally posted by Kal Rubinson
Well, you are certainly starting early and things may change by the time you need to act. We leased a new C320wagon (pre-4motion) for its combination of utility and driveability. The VW was more spacious but a bit stolid on the road (even with all the bells and whistles). The A4 3.0 was the closest alternative and there was no signficant difference in price. The BMW was appealing but was not in the running since there were none available in our purchase window.
Overall, we are very pleased with the C320 and our only complaint/repair over the past 9mos. has been a sagging luggage compartment cover. If I had it to do over (and I will in 2-3 years), I would probably make the same decision although I'd consider the 4motion option.
Biggest disappointment: Lack of CD player but I've corrected that.
Well, you are certainly starting early and things may change by the time you need to act. We leased a new C320wagon (pre-4motion) for its combination of utility and driveability. The VW was more spacious but a bit stolid on the road (even with all the bells and whistles). The A4 3.0 was the closest alternative and there was no signficant difference in price. The BMW was appealing but was not in the running since there were none available in our purchase window.
Overall, we are very pleased with the C320 and our only complaint/repair over the past 9mos. has been a sagging luggage compartment cover. If I had it to do over (and I will in 2-3 years), I would probably make the same decision although I'd consider the 4motion option.
Biggest disappointment: Lack of CD player but I've corrected that.
The C320 adds more money when 4-motion is selected which make sthe difference with the A4 significant. Otherwise, it would be a no brainer.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
big enough unless you are hauling mother in laws in the back seat
Originally posted by mbr129
Those two are a bit TOO compact. I just didn't want people to start suggesting the E320, A6, or 5-series wagons. Plus it needs to be a bit mroe refined than a WRX. My wife will drive it most of the time.
Those two are a bit TOO compact. I just didn't want people to start suggesting the E320, A6, or 5-series wagons. Plus it needs to be a bit mroe refined than a WRX. My wife will drive it most of the time.
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
have you sat in the back seats of those cars yet? i found the a4 to be almost useless for adults. we actually looked at the a6 wagon b/c of that.
ended up w/ the 325xiT. overall, we're pleased w/ it but i wish it was a bit zippier. our dealership's service dept is run by poopoo heads compared to the mb dealership.
ended up w/ the 325xiT. overall, we're pleased w/ it but i wish it was a bit zippier. our dealership's service dept is run by poopoo heads compared to the mb dealership.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke
Verdad Gallardo
8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records
Verdad Gallardo
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 29
From: West Los Angeles
2003 W203 C230, 2021 RS6, 2022 992S, 2024 Q8 Etron
A4 back seat is on the small side... I have one and I wouldn't want to sit back there for very long time. If you want more space, try A6 or AllRoad. As far as Audi reliablity goes... it's not much worst than MB reliability or BMW reliability so it's a non-issue (coil pack is over and resolved). Alternatively, VW Passat is in between A4 and A6 in size so maybe that's what you want. One advantage Audi has over the other is the full warranty/maintenace for 4 years (only thing not covered are 5 tires) and of course A4 is fully loaded compare to MB or BMW (standard 6 disk, power seat, leather etc).
Also check out the new Mazda6 wagon. 3.0 V6 220 hp available 5 speed MTX or ATX but no AWD option yet.
Also check out the new Mazda6 wagon. 3.0 V6 220 hp available 5 speed MTX or ATX but no AWD option yet.
Last edited by bzcat; Apr 25, 2003 at 07:27 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
2003 C230
A4 1.8T is quick with the manual tranny
Auto will probably suck. I test drove the stick and it was quick. Rumour has it that the 04's will have even more HP ( currently 170, 04s will probably get closer to 200 ). My wife has a 99 A4 2.8 Quattro Tiptronic and it has been trouble-free ( oops I said the jinx word ).
CZ
CZ
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
'03 BMW 330i ZHP / '06 Volvo V70R
I'll try to reply to the various points in one post.
The reason why I am not getting one now is because my 190E is in great shape, I just bought a loaded 330i, and I simply don't need it right now. Iam gettign married next year and will have kids (hopefully) a couple of years after that. That's when I'll need it.
As far as I know, MB, Audi, and BMW offer the same warranty/service periods with the same coverage. No doubt the A4 is the best buy if you assume reliability is about the same for all.
I know there are other options (bigger size or cheaper price, etc) but I wanted to know your opinions within the group mentioned and assuming it has to have auto and AWD.
Thanks!
The reason why I am not getting one now is because my 190E is in great shape, I just bought a loaded 330i, and I simply don't need it right now. Iam gettign married next year and will have kids (hopefully) a couple of years after that. That's when I'll need it.
As far as I know, MB, Audi, and BMW offer the same warranty/service periods with the same coverage. No doubt the A4 is the best buy if you assume reliability is about the same for all.
I know there are other options (bigger size or cheaper price, etc) but I wanted to know your opinions within the group mentioned and assuming it has to have auto and AWD.
Thanks!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
Originally posted by mbr129
As far as I know, MB, Audi, and BMW offer the same warranty/service periods with the same coverage. No doubt the A4 is the best buy if you assume reliability is about the same for all.
As far as I know, MB, Audi, and BMW offer the same warranty/service periods with the same coverage. No doubt the A4 is the best buy if you assume reliability is about the same for all.
also, i think roadside service is different. mb has a lifetime roadside policy but i think you pay for some services.
i don't know what the audi policies are.
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 29
From: West Los Angeles
2003 W203 C230, 2021 RS6, 2022 992S, 2024 Q8 Etron
Audi also covers brake pads AND rotors which is not covered by MB or BMW. Audi warranty also includes windshield wipers 
A4 AWD auto only come with Tiptronic which is relatively slow. A4 FWD auto come with CVT which is much faster.
The 1.8T for 2003 has 170 hp. For 2004 it will have 190 hp and 6 speed manual instead of 5 speed, and tiptronic (Quattro) and CVT (FWD) options.
A4 AWD auto only come with Tiptronic which is relatively slow. A4 FWD auto come with CVT which is much faster.
The 1.8T for 2003 has 170 hp. For 2004 it will have 190 hp and 6 speed manual instead of 5 speed, and tiptronic (Quattro) and CVT (FWD) options.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,600
Likes: 1
From: Earth
GLB 250 4matic
Originally posted by bzcat
Audi also covers brake pads AND rotors which is not covered by MB or BMW. Audi warranty also includes windshield wipers
Audi also covers brake pads AND rotors which is not covered by MB or BMW. Audi warranty also includes windshield wipers
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Wagon
Currently own a 2002 320C Wagon and a 1994 BMW 530T Wagon. The MB has been a great trouble free car with superb handling and more than adequate interior room. The BMW is a nice design, but as it has aged has been a maintenance nightmare. Far too many fragile bits all of which very expensive to replace repair. (heating/cooling system was engineered by commitee and the double acting sunroof is a complete money sink)Looked at the A4, but back seat comfort and overall design were negatives compared to the MB. Have no exp. with the AWD, but unless the vehicle is operated reqularly in marginal driving conditions, I'm not sure the addtional complexity and cost is worth it. Depending on your needs, I would look downstream at a 320 coming off lease and into the Starmark Program. You should get a good vehicle for fair market price.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
'03 BMW 330i ZHP / '06 Volvo V70R
I did some more research this weekend, and I decided to narrow down the choices to the A4 3.0 Avant, the C320W 4-matic and the 325xiT all with an auto.
As I mentioned, the AWD and auto transmission are requirements, not up for discussion. I have my reasons and it's too long to explain. But the decision has been made between my wife and I that the wagon we get will be auto and AWD. Period. She also wants teh wagon to have some luxury, since my new 330i is optioned to be sporty, not luxurious (alcantara seats, 6-speed, 18"wheels, performance suspension, etc)
It's pretty evident that the C320 is the better wagon. Best engine, most features, most luxury, very roomy, good looks. It's also very expensive. About 4-5K more than the other two.
The BMW is good looking, sporty, and cheaper, but the engine is just very weak. Particularly in torque (which is what I care about for its applciation) with 175lb-ft, vs 221 for MB and Audi. It's just too weak for it's weight.
The Audi is by far the bargain of the group. Very well equipped and with a good engine it costs as much as the BMW. It even includes a standard 6-CD changer. But we don't like the interior, it is not as comfort oriented as the Benz, and for all it's equipment, it is still not as well-equipped as the Benz, nor as luxurious.
So, since we will buy the wagon used, it seems the target will be to find a C320W 4-matic in good condition. Unless the Audi shows equal reliability and a significantly lower price, in which case we may be persuaded.
As I mentioned, the AWD and auto transmission are requirements, not up for discussion. I have my reasons and it's too long to explain. But the decision has been made between my wife and I that the wagon we get will be auto and AWD. Period. She also wants teh wagon to have some luxury, since my new 330i is optioned to be sporty, not luxurious (alcantara seats, 6-speed, 18"wheels, performance suspension, etc)
It's pretty evident that the C320 is the better wagon. Best engine, most features, most luxury, very roomy, good looks. It's also very expensive. About 4-5K more than the other two.
The BMW is good looking, sporty, and cheaper, but the engine is just very weak. Particularly in torque (which is what I care about for its applciation) with 175lb-ft, vs 221 for MB and Audi. It's just too weak for it's weight.
The Audi is by far the bargain of the group. Very well equipped and with a good engine it costs as much as the BMW. It even includes a standard 6-CD changer. But we don't like the interior, it is not as comfort oriented as the Benz, and for all it's equipment, it is still not as well-equipped as the Benz, nor as luxurious.
So, since we will buy the wagon used, it seems the target will be to find a C320W 4-matic in good condition. Unless the Audi shows equal reliability and a significantly lower price, in which case we may be persuaded.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Croton, NY
1991 mr2 turbo, 2002 coupe
I never thought I'd have any interest in this subject, but a certain vehicle at the auto show opened my mind to this practical class of cars. The 2004 Subaru Forester XT (the T stands for turbo.) The specs are rather impressive as is the much improved and refined interior. Apparently it will share much of the same technology that will be found in the STi, but it will boast a more earthly 210hp @5600 but more impressive 235lb/ft torque @3600. Curb weight with the manual should be decently light for the class @3250. I wasn't able to find EPA mileage estimates but I'd expect about 20/27 (nothing stellar.) I couldn't find anything on performance numbers until I found the Canadian site that stated 0-60 in 6.1 with the 5sp manual and that is not a typo! Nothing firm on pricing though but well under 30 should be a lock. And yes, you could get the WRX wagon for less I'd imagine, but the Forester will be standard with literally a ton more creature comforts(check em out), space and civility. I don't know if they tweaked anything on the suspension for the XT, so the one hesitation is will the handling be up the added power which I'm really not sure (but actaully never rode in one so I have nothing to go on there.) Anyway, something to consider on the low cost option route I'd say.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
Peugeot 505 Turbo
N9TE Turbo engine, good for 180 HP, BIG lusty torque, 0-100 km/h in maybe 7.5 s, top end of 220 km/h+ if it's tuned right. Get one in the SW8 configuration and it seats eight plus still has luggage space left over. Carrying capacity of a small bus, plus can carry 800 kg load. Classic Pininfarina styling. What more could you want?
Oh, it's 12+ years old, never mind
Not trendy enough - or politically correct on this Board 
Oh, it's 12+ years old, never mind
Not trendy enough - or politically correct on this Board
Almost a Member!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Behind the Orange Curtain, CA
C230K, 325iT
Re: Choosing a compact wagon
Originally posted by mbr129
So do you guys have any input? Have you driven any of the cars? What do think about cost, reliability, etc. I have been a huge MB fan my whole life and love my 190E (very reliable) but I haven't heard great things lately about MB reliability.
What would you pick given my needs, etc? Just looking for a good car dicussion.
So do you guys have any input? Have you driven any of the cars? What do think about cost, reliability, etc. I have been a huge MB fan my whole life and love my 190E (very reliable) but I haven't heard great things lately about MB reliability.
What would you pick given my needs, etc? Just looking for a good car dicussion.
http://www.audiworld.com/news/02/new_s4/2003s4004.jpg
Much as I love my 325 wagon, adding AWD and an automatic would suck all the fun out of this particular car (the 330Xi wagon would be great, if only BMWNA would sell it here). If you really require AWD, I think the Audi is a great choice, though like the BMW it is somewhat smaller than you might expect. MB would also be a good choice (in the C320). Either way, I think all the current small euro-wagons are cool - hard to go wrong, so have some fun test drives and make the call.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
2010 C300 4matic
Mike T., I saw a Peugeot 505 Turbo parked on the street today, but it wasn't a wagon. It's very rare to see a Peugeot around here. They had a sticker in the back window, something about "If you think my car is ugly, look at yours" or something like that, but I think it was a Citroen sticker. It had those two ^ symbols on it. That's Citroen, right?
