post KLEEMANN flywheel install Dyno's
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
post KLEEMANN flywheel install Dyno's
Ok, I dyno'd today... Here they are, I am happy... The is the stock MAX compared to the w/flywheel MAX
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/attachment.php?postid=479122)
The w/KLEEMANN flywheel modification stand alone.
The numbers from the max dyno run...
The same correction factor was used for the baseline and todays dyno's. I didn't bother with A/F today as I didn't change anything that would affect it.
So, to place a conclusion to this stuff...
Not only did I gain so much in feel, shift, and launches, I gained 9.8 ft/lbs of torque, and 5.7 HP at the wheels with the KLEEMANN flywheel/clutch/pressure plate mod. Not bad for just removing some wieght.
This is just about awesome in my opinion. It is a very worth while modification in my opinion.
Thomas
The w/KLEEMANN flywheel modification stand alone.
The numbers from the max dyno run...
The same correction factor was used for the baseline and todays dyno's. I didn't bother with A/F today as I didn't change anything that would affect it.
So, to place a conclusion to this stuff...
Not only did I gain so much in feel, shift, and launches, I gained 9.8 ft/lbs of torque, and 5.7 HP at the wheels with the KLEEMANN flywheel/clutch/pressure plate mod. Not bad for just removing some wieght.
This is just about awesome in my opinion. It is a very worth while modification in my opinion.
Thomas
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Last edited by nukblazi; 08-13-2003 at 08:57 PM.
#3
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: sf bay area
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'03 C320 coupe-manual, '07 530i
Pixs fine. So what was the $/hp expense, i.e., How much to gain 5.7 hp or an increase of 3.4% ??
Last edited by Wheens; 08-13-2003 at 09:18 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Depends on how you look at it.
If this modification was being mass marketed, it was speculated that it would cost approx. $1700.00, which is comparable to similar race units for the Audi S4.
Beyond the HP gain, the Torque gain is significant.
The feel is awesome compared to stock. It is a 6-puck vs. a solid clutch disk. Launches, shifts, and downshifting is significantly improved. The new flywheel is 22lbs. lighter, and a S4 pressure plate was modified to work with the coupe and the spring rate was increased.
Beyond that, and most importantly. I had heated the stock unit several times to the point it no longer could maintain friction. So the clutch just slipped and slipped and slipped. This unit will not suffer from the same issue. Now I can move on to more substancial modifications without the fear of not having the clutch there when I need it. This unit should be good to 400 HP easily.
If this modification was being mass marketed, it was speculated that it would cost approx. $1700.00, which is comparable to similar race units for the Audi S4.
Beyond the HP gain, the Torque gain is significant.
The feel is awesome compared to stock. It is a 6-puck vs. a solid clutch disk. Launches, shifts, and downshifting is significantly improved. The new flywheel is 22lbs. lighter, and a S4 pressure plate was modified to work with the coupe and the spring rate was increased.
Beyond that, and most importantly. I had heated the stock unit several times to the point it no longer could maintain friction. So the clutch just slipped and slipped and slipped. This unit will not suffer from the same issue. Now I can move on to more substancial modifications without the fear of not having the clutch there when I need it. This unit should be good to 400 HP easily.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
This just doesn't make any sense... All this tells me is that the dyno is fairly inacurate to show a significant - 9.8 ft*lbs - discrepancy, as there has been nothing done to this engine yet to increase its power output. A flywheel is just a mechanical capacitor - it doesn't dissipate any energy. It will certainly affect the engine's dynamics, but not the power output (which we clearly see on these two graphs).
Last edited by vadim; 08-13-2003 at 10:07 PM.
#6
If what you say is correct, there is no point in lightening anything in the drive train. I guess all the money racers spend on lightweight con rods, titanium valves, carbon fiber driveshafts, magnesium wheels, etc is just wasted.
vadim, it consumes more horsepower to accelerate a heavy flywheel and clutch than a lighter one. Nukbazi's set up consumes less power and that shows up at the wheels.
vadim, it consumes more horsepower to accelerate a heavy flywheel and clutch than a lighter one. Nukbazi's set up consumes less power and that shows up at the wheels.
#7
vad> Look at it from a converse point of view at the extreme. If you had 300 kilos of lead stuffed in your drive shaft would your chassis dyno numbers change?
nuk> Can you run through the gears on the dyno? t.p. thread was sweet, thanks for the r&d, dyno $, and autoX feedbacK.
nuk> Can you run through the gears on the dyno? t.p. thread was sweet, thanks for the r&d, dyno $, and autoX feedbacK.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally posted by Lynn
If what you say is correct, there is no point in lightening anything in the drive train. I guess all the money racers spend on lightweight con rods, titanium valves, carbon fiber driveshafts, magnesium wheels, etc is just wasted.
vadim, it consumes more horsepower to accelerate a heavy flywheel and clutch than a lighter one. Nukbazi's set up consumes less power and that shows up at the wheels.
If what you say is correct, there is no point in lightening anything in the drive train. I guess all the money racers spend on lightweight con rods, titanium valves, carbon fiber driveshafts, magnesium wheels, etc is just wasted.
vadim, it consumes more horsepower to accelerate a heavy flywheel and clutch than a lighter one. Nukbazi's set up consumes less power and that shows up at the wheels.
Last edited by vadim; 08-14-2003 at 12:33 AM.
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32AMG
A DYNOJET dynamometer is an
inertial dyno:it measures how quickly the tested vehicle's drivetrain can accelerate the dyno's drums.Anything that affects the inertia in the drivetrain will shift the dyno results.If you mount lighter wheels/tires/a flywheel/driveshaft or whatever,the car will yield bigger torque numbers.
Conversely,larger (and heavier) tire/wheel packages have an opposite effect.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Mad](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/mad.gif)
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent posts guys...
Tying a 10 lbs. wieght to the end of a string and spinning it in a circle is not as easy as spinning a 5 lbs. wieght at the same speed.
The 10 lbs. wieght also takes longer to get up to speed, and stop.
This Dyno is extremely accurate. The correction factor was identical between the baseline and todays dyno's, I used the same 93 octane gas from the same gas station, and I used the same dyno, and dyno operator.
As Steve explicitly stated, and stated quite well, the lightening of components in the drivetrain will be represented at the wheels on an inertia dyno. No, the crankshalf HP has not changed, we are just losing less of it on it's way to the wheels. This is why racing wheels are lighwieght and racing clutch/flywheel assemblies are lightwieght, and lightwieght driveshalfts are used, etc... This is also why the conversion from the wheels to the crank is a best guess more then an exact formula.
Vadim, as you stated, there are vibrations felt with in the car now. They are controlable with RPM management and gear selection speed and timing for road driving. At speed and in the upper RPM band you can't feel it. The same gearbox vibrations were there before, they were just dampened by the dual mass +22 lbs. heavier flywheel.
Hobie- We did a run in third gear but I forgot to ask for a print out. The dyno operated mentioned again how consistant the car was.
I will be going back so I can have them printed for me. All four of today's runs on a single graph, and the third gear run. All of today's runs only varied by a few tenths n.8, n.5. One run was 173.n max HP
Next up is the pulley install. Hopefully I can keep everyone entertained for a little while...
Tying a 10 lbs. wieght to the end of a string and spinning it in a circle is not as easy as spinning a 5 lbs. wieght at the same speed.
The 10 lbs. wieght also takes longer to get up to speed, and stop.
This Dyno is extremely accurate. The correction factor was identical between the baseline and todays dyno's, I used the same 93 octane gas from the same gas station, and I used the same dyno, and dyno operator.
As Steve explicitly stated, and stated quite well, the lightening of components in the drivetrain will be represented at the wheels on an inertia dyno. No, the crankshalf HP has not changed, we are just losing less of it on it's way to the wheels. This is why racing wheels are lighwieght and racing clutch/flywheel assemblies are lightwieght, and lightwieght driveshalfts are used, etc... This is also why the conversion from the wheels to the crank is a best guess more then an exact formula.
Vadim, as you stated, there are vibrations felt with in the car now. They are controlable with RPM management and gear selection speed and timing for road driving. At speed and in the upper RPM band you can't feel it. The same gearbox vibrations were there before, they were just dampened by the dual mass +22 lbs. heavier flywheel.
Hobie- We did a run in third gear but I forgot to ask for a print out. The dyno operated mentioned again how consistant the car was.
I will be going back so I can have them printed for me. All four of today's runs on a single graph, and the third gear run. All of today's runs only varied by a few tenths n.8, n.5. One run was 173.n max HP
Next up is the pulley install. Hopefully I can keep everyone entertained for a little while...
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Abingdon, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just thought this was funny, this morning I had six hundred and sixty six miles on the new flywheel...
666
muhahahahahaha I made it through the day though
666
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)