Regular Unleaded Gas Users Post here
I cant imagine running 87 to save cents.. for crying out loud... not to mention the potential warranty issues with using 87.
Pre-ignition is not going to bend valves. Piston and valve collisions bend valves and since the engine cannot be over-revved I don't see that happening.
Nice little anecdote, though.
Too much hassle for me to figure out, i'll just go with 93.
Mercedes has no incentive whatsoever to make you use higher octane than you need, and of course Mercedes knows more about its "knock sensor" than do you.
I would suggest those proud of themselves for "beating the system" by using regular fuel put their money where their mouths are and post their VIN numbers here--cars to avoid on the used market for sure.
The economics of the choice to run Regular Fuel don't work out with these cars. Mercedes runs knock-sensors which will retard the timing when you fill with Regular fuel.
Retarding the ignition timing avoids engine knock with fuel that has a lower octane number but has the side effect of a less efficient burn. This means that you make less horsepower AND you have worse fuel economy.
If you calculate the price you spend at the pump for premium and compare to the lower price of regular and take into consideration the worse fuel mileage you get on regular, you actually spend no more money on premium fuel than you do on regular. That's right, you pretty well break even and in some cases even finish ahead economically on Premium fuel. And, you get the added bonus of better quality fuel with premium, a better running engine, and a better detergent package to keep everything clean.
Face it... running Regular gas in these cars a losing battle.
The economics of the choice to run Regular Fuel don't work out with these cars. Mercedes runs knock-sensors which will retard the timing when you fill with Regular fuel.
Retarding the ignition timing avoids engine knock with fuel that has a lower octane number but has the side effect of a less efficient burn. This means that you make less horsepower AND you have worse fuel economy.
If you calculate the price you spend at the pump for premium and compare to the lower price of regular and take into consideration the worse fuel mileage you get on regular, you actually spend no more money on premium fuel than you do on regular. That's right, you pretty well break even and in some cases even finish ahead economically on Premium fuel. And, you get the added bonus of better quality fuel with premium, a better running engine, and a better detergent package to keep everything clean.
Face it... running Regular gas in these cars a losing battle.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Those links to the articles you posted don't really help your case. The first one talked about not going OVER the recommended octane which is accurate. Some people think the higher octane will yield more performance. That's not true. Think of octane as a "burn rate timing agent." The higher the octane, the slower the fuel burns. If the car were designed for 87, you're wasting your money on anything higher because it's burning too slow for the power stroke itself. Your engine timing will be off the OTHER way = still bad!
The second article seemed to back you up a little bit but the "it seems okay now" stuff is going to get you in trouble "later." You need to have a little faith in the engineers and follow their recommendations. They gain nothing by making you spend more money on gas.
Also, the more expensive gas itself gets, the better bargain premium gets because it is ALWAYS a constant 20 cents a gallon more than regular!
If you're not going to listen to us and use premium, like I said above, at least use plus! Most manufacturers will err on the side of safety but going TWO grades below their recommendations is foolish.
, but in the meen time Welcome to MBworld.-Mike
Last edited by newtonlaw; Apr 11, 2008 at 03:00 PM.



