AWD Dyno
but the tradgedy lies in the fact that someone might believe the nonesense & garbage that will come out of an amateur American type street side dyno. I have plenty of experience of them too and their output is rubbish.
Edit: There are going to be those on the forum that prefer to listen to Fred Flintstone - I respect that. I'll back Einstein every time thanks.
You're right, silly Americans shouldn't try to use their inferior science. Then again, you're closer to a gibbon than an Einstein.
Last edited by Peabody; Dec 5, 2009 at 02:27 PM.

They are amazing people, all of them are great.
And I saw your picture on whdnl's facebook
I was the one he told him how to blackout his car and paint his grill.
[(460+70)/(460+74)]^.5 = .995 (ignoring the trivial .18 ME effect).
A 4 degree temp rise, F or C, does not cancel an independent 8% power gain.
--
Last edited by kevink2; Dec 5, 2009 at 09:29 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Yeah Wes spoke of you a bit, his car def looks much better blacked out. Plus he blacked out just enough and didn't overdo it. I like it!

[(460+70)/(460+74)]^.5 = .995 (ignoring the trivial .18 ME effect).
A 4 degree temp rise, F or C, does not cancel an independent 8% power gain.
--
As people don't want to believe me they should search the net. There is some surprisingly good data on why dyno results are not repeatable & can be problematic in absolute terms. Cosworth also have some good data. Some of the best material is by those testing motorcycles. With bikes you have an easier situation generally because you can connect the GB output sprocket shaft direct to an eddy current brake or whatever. You don't have brake pads touching rotors & other things to throw you off track.
I'm going to clear out of micropower's thread now. We have some of the few dynos here at SASTECH that operate in a truly altitude compensated environment. You can wind the effective air pressure up & down in the dyno rooms - control IAT etc. Getting meaningful, repeatable results is still a nightmare irrespective of dyno resolution.
There is some argument whether IAT's are for instant IAT value, or general average value for a period of the day, since most have very slow response. But IAT is not a strong variable, as I showed.
My main point is there are "unintended consequences" when a forum guru like you makes a specific example like that. Your followers walk away thinking a 4 deg temp rise can wipe out an independent 8% power gain, and then overestimate the effect of intake temperature.
-----------------
I do consider you a true oil guru. I hope you will add links at the end of your ultimate-oil thread, to your many valuable oil explanations in various threads.
--
Last edited by kevink2; Dec 6, 2009 at 04:23 PM.
Yeah Wes spoke of you a bit, his car def looks much better blacked out. Plus he blacked out just enough and didn't overdo it. I like it!
Well go with Advance, they are amazing people and they have the best service I have ever found.
I told wes to get his eisenmann exhaust before the ecu tune

There is some argument whether IAT's are are for instant IAT value, or general average value for the day, since most have slow response. But it is not a strong variable,a s I showed.
My main point is there are "unintended consequences" when a forum "guru" like you makes an example like that, as you did. Your followers walk away thinking a 4 deg temp rise can wipe out an independent 8% power gain.
-----------------
I do consider you a true oil guru. I hope you will add links at the end of your ultimate-oil thread, to your many valuable oil explanations.
I'm sure that you would agree that variation in IAT effects different engines differently with respect to output - it is not as simple as a JIS or SAE formula - even they do not correlate. On some set ups differences can be quite dramatic.
Suffice to say it is my experience that major engine builders involved in serious racing do not depend on dyno absolute power readings to predict the performance of an engine on a real world race track.
I do not retreat from my stance and I'm sure I have more time spent running dyno tests than most on this forum with all it's foibles. Certainly more hours than those that criticise or choose to call me a douchebag.
I do apologise for my sometimes blunt expression. I'm South African & that is our way.
Should you be interested in some even more blunt commentary from myself and timdf you might like to read these threads & those attached to them. Unfortunately poor micropower was involved in one of them which I had forgotten. Now I see why he thinks I troll for dyno threads. I don't.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...ey-system.html
Here people are called "Idiots, Knuckleheads, Retards & worse!!
I also host a discussion on the AMS pulley - see link in thread
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...****+on+a+bull
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 6, 2009 at 06:02 PM.
There is nothing wrong with seeing where your car stands from point A to B.
I've have had done many dyno runs on my EJ205 motor at sea level, identical temperature and humidity within a span of many months. All done because I was tuning my car and I've seen relative, consistent gains. Does this mean none of it is real? Nope. If I had multimillion dollar facility to "measure" my cars, I wouldn't have bought a C Class anyway.


BTW - If I was talking about complex driving (rather than just flooring the car) such as driving the European urban cycle. Then I would let a computer drive the car on a very well sorted & calibrated dyno.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 7, 2009 at 03:04 AM.
Last edited by Peabody; Dec 7, 2009 at 03:34 AM.

Your modesty is staggering.
Last edited by Peabody; Dec 7, 2009 at 04:33 AM.



Also, I got 3 runs for $90.