C300 driving in snow
P.S. I used to own a Subaru and I know what I'm talking about.

I don't understand how people can't drive in the snow with an AWD car. I could see if you get FEET of snow that's just too high for the bottom of the car to clear...but besides that I don't get it. I had a Supercharged Mustang GT with 18" rims and low profile performance tires for 10yrs and never had a problem in the snow...so people that complain about driving in the snow with an AWD car w/ all-season tires just crack me up.
Haven't had a problem yet with my C300
This is definitely a common misconception. A RWD car will perform fine as well, as long as snow tires are mounted. From my experience, snow tires, even on a RWD car, will add a ton of grip and will allow for freer driving.
I reported earlier on my 60 mile trek across the mountains in my RWD C300. It made it, and drove very well on fresh snow, or surfaces that were only snow. On ice it wanted to slide, especially when gravity helped.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Now, with a AWD I read a complaint and agree whole handsomely that the tires are the culprit.
As for the Audi alpha series, well yes, and so there are other cars of different niches, but I prefer Mercedes to VW. I don't even know yet how I will feel about Porsches in the future, my other joy.


P.S. I used to own a Subaru and I know what I'm talking about.
I know the difference between the systems. I've owned 3 Subarus. Also, been working in a Subaru/Mitsubishi performance shop for 3 years, and continue to do so in the Summers when home from school. I know Subarus INSIDE and OUT. I am a Subaru fanatic!
I know how to drive in deep snow and icey conditions, and would take my Scoob WAY over my 4-Matic C300. You want to talk about a solid sedan made for such conditions..
More complex system, yes, superior? No. They are made for different applications... Eye's of the beholder I suppose.
If you know how to utilize the drivetrain in a Scoob you will indeed outperform a 4-Matic.
The 4-Matic system especially coupled with ESP is astonishing for most people, hell I was impressed with how well it kept the car under control when purposefully attempting to lose control.
The system I feel, is geared to help people who don't know how to drive in nasty conditions to save their asses... IMO
Ron
I know the difference between the systems. I've owned 3 Subarus. Also, been working in a Subaru/Mitsubishi performance shop for 3 years, and continue to do so in the Summers when home from school. I know Subarus INSIDE and OUT. I am a Subaru fanatic!
I know how to drive in deep snow and icey conditions, and would take my Scoob WAY over my 4-Matic C300. You want to talk about a solid sedan made for such conditions..
More complex system, yes, superior? No. They are made for different applications... Eye's of the beholder I suppose.
If you know how to utilize the drivetrain in a Scoob you will indeed outperform a 4-Matic.
The 4-Matic system especially coupled with ESP is astonishing for most people, hell I was impressed with how well it kept the car under control when purposefully attempting to lose control.
The system I feel, is geared to help people who don't know how to drive in nasty conditions to save their asses... IMO
Ron
I'm not sure why you suggest that they are built for different applications, they are both AWD systems designed to transfer power between the front and rear wheels.
I think we can all agree that the most important thing is probably the tires, especially in snow.
I wish Subaru would invest in a luxury model, it would probably sell well in the US.
Manuals (excl STI) are static 50/50 split - really need slow in fast out style in corners under slippery / snowy or ice conditions - other wise they have severe understeer, even at 10 mph speeds. A real dog in slippery corners if don't go in slower than normally would in any car.
STIs are variable static split- can adjust manually on the fly but no viscous transmission. Great for all out driving and more fun!
Three choices - a flavor for all tastes. I'm pretty sure it's the same for all models.
Snow tires are critical - delivering superior traction even on cold dry pavement - cold wet and snow, ice etc there is no comparison. Narrower the better for severe conditions but for 90% of real world city conditions 17s and 18s are fine.
4matic is probably one of the smartest awd systems on the planet but I believe they licensed the core tech from 3rd party.
Last edited by whiteongrey; Feb 11, 2010 at 10:15 PM.
There is something wrong either your car or with your driving. The traction control light should be flashing. I was having a wonderful time driving in 17" of snow yesterday in my W203 with all seasons (not the conti garbage though - they really are trash). Best thing to do if 4matic and ESP are new to you is to find a big open lot next time it snows and gun it a few times. You'll gain a much better understanding of how the system works.
Suby AWD's ... see bottom 1/4 of page, and ingore all the symmetric garbage. whiteongrey had it mostly right.
All Suby's have the ability to lock-up the center diff/clutch in say aggressive snow play. The 4MATIC has a center diff with a fixed preload clutch, afaik, and no lock-up capability. In this aspect, I think Suby has the advantage.
To OP, we went from 98 audi A4 with torsen locking center diff and narrow 205 tires, to the 4MATIC with 225 michelins, and have not been dissappointed with normal winter driving.
.
Last edited by kevink2; Feb 14, 2010 at 03:01 AM.





