Whats with all the talk about the death of the manual next year?
example:
I don't care if it is slower and/or gets worse fuel economy, I love the mechanical connection to the car when driving. I have been in a loaner with an auto for well over a week and although it has a great auto, I don't enjoy it anywhere near as much as shifting for myself.
Those few C Class manuals which were scheduled became essentially an "afterthought" (2-3% of US C Class) and primarily needed as an entry level advertiseable price leader. Note that almost all the manuals were low content (P1 or less) cars. They have too little volume to then receive any specific marketing support, so those seeking a stick don't come across any marketing messages targeted to bring them in. With low inventory, and infrequent shoppers, dealers sell what they have and don't reorder for stock, and down it goes until MBUSA convinces itself that sticks have too little volume potential to justify the product complexity to maintain them.
Adding to the MBUSA momentum to cancel manuals is that the variable cost of a manual trans is usually higher than that for an automatic trans, and the auto is priceable. The industry has been charging about a grand of price for automatics for decades, for a transmission which costs less than the stick. So, if MBUSA convinces themselves they can meet their sales targets without the manual, their overall profitability increases.
For the opposite approach, consider how Audi and BMW target enthusiast buyers. I assume some C Class manual transmission volume will defect to those brands on the next cycle.
I can prob live with the automatic if the rest of the car appeals to me enough.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
....that is what they are counting on for at least some of the current manual trans sales volume......unfortunately.





