C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

Is no muffler bad for your car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2011, 05:38 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Mixedfruits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 626
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 Black on Black
Is no muffler bad for your car?

Title reads the question.
Been hearing that mufflers provide down pressure or something of sorts to help the engine and with out the mufflers the head will dry out head not headers. Anyone know anything about this?
Old 02-24-2011, 05:59 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 1 hours drive north of Sydney Australia
Posts: 3,714
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
2007 W204 220CDI Classic Sedan
I have run motor cycles without mufflers for years without any adverse effects.

Mufflers do add back pressure to to the combustion system .

I dare say the modern car engine is designed to give optimum performance with this back pressure.

Some have said that lessening the backpressure can burn exhaust valves.

I would say that this would not happen overnight!
Old 02-24-2011, 11:33 PM
  #3  
RLE
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
Originally Posted by Mixedfruits
Title reads the question.
Been hearing that mufflers provide down pressure or something of sorts to help the engine and with out the mufflers the head will dry out head not headers. Anyone know anything about this?
I think YOUR head is dried out. That's what I think.

And, it's backpressure.
Old 02-25-2011, 12:57 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
GHAZAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Norte America
Posts: 1,463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
MBUSA
i don't see how exhaust valves will burn with less back pressure. If it's less back pressure, exhaust should be leaving at a faster velocity. maybe someone with more knowledge will clarify

Last edited by GHAZAN; 02-25-2011 at 01:00 AM.
Old 02-25-2011, 01:01 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Mixedfruits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 626
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 Black on Black
Originally Posted by RLE
I think YOUR head is dried out. That's what I think.

And, it's backpressure.
Thanks for the helpful comment lol

Last edited by Mixedfruits; 02-25-2011 at 01:23 AM.
Old 02-25-2011, 03:42 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 1 hours drive north of Sydney Australia
Posts: 3,714
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
2007 W204 220CDI Classic Sedan
Originally Posted by GHAZAN
i don't see how exhaust valves will burn with less back pressure. If it's less back pressure, exhaust should be leaving at a faster velocity. maybe someone with more knowledge will clarify
Exactly ,I would have thought that shutting hot gas off at a greater velocity will create more wear on the mating surfaces. .
Old 02-25-2011, 08:37 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,601
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6 Speed Manual, 1953 Chevy Bel-Air, 2015 Audi allroad, 1963 Chevy Apache
Originally Posted by GHAZAN
i don't see how exhaust valves will burn with less back pressure. If it's less back pressure, exhaust should be leaving at a faster velocity. maybe someone with more knowledge will clarify
With nothing else changing, reduced back pressure can cause an engine to run lean and hot (more air sucked in with the same amount of fuel injected) with the exhaust valve generally being the first part of the engine that may have issues.
Old 02-25-2011, 01:24 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jctevere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dix Hills, New York
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2012 C250 Coupe
The exhaust as it exits the piping is moving in the form of pulses or pressure waves with varying speeds and pressures. These pulses have mass, and want to continue moving at a high rate of speed. These pulses if they are moving fast enough, will create a low pressure region behind them and will help draw out more spent exhaust from the engine, and will create a region of lower pressure inside the exhaust manifold.

If the system is too short, the fast moving pulse will collapse as it exits the end of the pipe, and the low pressure wake will also collapse, reducing the scavenging effect, especially at low RPM. This will be felt as a decrease in performance right off the line.

As RPMS increase, the speed and frequency of these pressure waves increases, negating some of the performance losses and restoring the scavenging effect.

Exhaust scavenging is a function of velocity, not backpressure. Having lower backpressure is a good thing. If a modification decreases the velocity, then a low RPM power loss will be the result. In the case of cutting off the muffler and not at least replacing it with a straight pipe, this modification is reducing the opportunity for the exhaust to built up and keep the speed, and it instead slowing down the exhaust as it exits, creating more backpressure than the stock muffler.

An x-pipe creates a cross flow which allows the pressure waves to accelerate each other and create a positive induction.

If you replace your muffler with a piece of pipe, you will get the sound you are probably after without loosing the velocity that is essential to produce power.
Old 02-25-2011, 07:12 PM
  #9  
RLE
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
Not this again

Originally Posted by Carsy
I have run motor cycles without mufflers for years without any adverse effects.

Mufflers do add back pressure to to the combustion system .

I dare say the modern car engine is designed to give optimum performance with this back pressure.

Some have said that lessening the backpressure can burn exhaust valves.
This is just an old wives tale from decades past. It was thought by some that after shutting down, cold air would rush up the pipe and warp something.

Now I ask you, does this make sense?
Old 02-25-2011, 07:21 PM
  #10  
RLE
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RLE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SEATTLE WASHINGTON USA
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'08 C300 Lux Barolo Red Beige Leather P2 MM 18" wheels '84 944
Originally Posted by C300Sport
With nothing else changing, reduced back pressure can cause an engine to run lean and hot (more air sucked in with the same amount of fuel injected) with the exhaust valve generally being the first part of the engine that may have issues.
This theory is wrong. Intake air is measured by the mass airflow sensor which sends a signal to the engine management computer which, with other inputs, determines how much fuel to inject.

Even carbureted engines operate this way although jets have to be changed to supply more fuel at high rpms.

The Porsches I owned with Weber triple throat carbs were modified with larger venturis which meant larger idle and main jets. But, enlarging the venturis meant a loss of low end torque. It's a tradeoff.

And, 4-valve heads without variable intake cam timing also costs low end performance.
Old 02-26-2011, 09:21 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,601
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6 Speed Manual, 1953 Chevy Bel-Air, 2015 Audi allroad, 1963 Chevy Apache
Originally Posted by RLE
This theory is wrong. Intake air is measured by the mass airflow sensor which sends a signal to the engine management computer which, with other inputs, determines how much fuel to inject.

Even carbureted engines operate this way although jets have to be changed to supply more fuel at high rpms.

The Porsches I owned with Weber triple throat carbs were modified with larger venturis which meant larger idle and main jets. But, enlarging the venturis meant a loss of low end torque. It's a tradeoff.

And, 4-valve heads without variable intake cam timing also costs low end performance.
The theory is actually perfectly sound. It seems like your argument against it left out my "with nothing else changing". I was just stating what happens with no engine management or other variables.
I opened up the exhaust and intake on my old school carburated bike and was running way to lean. If I wouldn't have rejetted, I would have fried the valves within 1000 miles.
Old 02-26-2011, 02:16 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
envyxc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: So-Cal
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c350
I cut my mufflers off a while ago on the 350, no problem at all. And I drive it like I stole it every time. Then I installed headers and cat delete and put mufflers back on as the sounds was to much.
Old 02-26-2011, 02:19 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,601
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
2008 C300 Sport 6 Speed Manual, 1953 Chevy Bel-Air, 2015 Audi allroad, 1963 Chevy Apache
Originally Posted by envyxc350
I cut my mufflers off a while ago on the 350, no problem at all. And I drive it like I stole it every time. Then I installed headers and cat delete and put mufflers back on as the sounds was to much.
How was the exhaust tone with the muffler cut out?
Old 02-26-2011, 03:29 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Mixedfruits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 626
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 Black on Black
Originally Posted by C300Sport
How was the exhaust tone with the muffler cut out?
great only around 2k its very annoying and around 1k-2k there is a noticeable vibration in the cabin 2.5k------- sound like xpipe muffler at 3k but a bit louder and for the whole duration instead for a little time. Outside the car I havent let anyone drive my car so idk based on friends, they say sounds great maybe at peak legal sound 95db in cali
Old 02-26-2011, 05:02 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wnunez89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UCF area Orlando/West Palm Beach FL.
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
c350coupe, Gencoupe R-spec
Originally Posted by envyxc350
I cut my mufflers off a while ago on the 350, no problem at all. And I drive it like I stole it every time. Then I installed headers and cat delete and put mufflers back on as the sounds was to much.
was there any fitment issues with your headers?
Old 02-26-2011, 05:08 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tanktube67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SFV CA
Posts: 4,433
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2008 Black Out C350 Saks Edition / 87 VW GTI
Originally Posted by Mixedfruits
Title reads the question.
Been hearing that mufflers provide down pressure or something of sorts to help the engine and with out the mufflers the head will dry out head not headers. Anyone know anything about this?
Is not bad for your engine, you may get some power increase and laud exhaust sound with vibration.
Old 02-26-2011, 06:39 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Mixedfruits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 626
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E63 Black on Black
Originally Posted by wnunez89
was there any fitment issues with your headers?
headers? my mufflers was taken off didnt even touch my headers lmfao
Old 02-26-2011, 09:40 PM
  #18  
Member
 
kirillbenz22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LA
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB C-300 Sport 2009 Manual Black XPIPE+Exhaust
Originally Posted by Mixedfruits
great only around 2k its very annoying and around 1k-2k there is a noticeable vibration in the cabin 2.5k------- sound like xpipe muffler at 3k but a bit louder and for the whole duration instead for a little time. Outside the car I havent let anyone drive my car so idk based on friends, they say sounds great maybe at peak legal sound 95db in cali
that was right on by the way you couldn't of explained it any better, and I am not beeing sarcastic. I have no mufflers with an xpipe for over a year and a half and no problems so far... and i drive it a LOT!
Old 02-26-2011, 09:43 PM
  #19  
Member
 
kirillbenz22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: LA
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB C-300 Sport 2009 Manual Black XPIPE+Exhaust
BTW less back pressure less torque. Some say more horespower.

Top Gear
Some say in his wallet he has a picture....of his wallet! STIG

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Is no muffler bad for your car?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.