Brake Pads and Rotors
I would definately get the brake flush done at 2 years due to warranty purposes.
your rotors will need to be replaced if they have thickness variation or are too thin. the wear tolerance for the rotors are 2.5mm total. its better to be safe than to cheap out.
front rotors are normally 28MM thick and needs to be 25.4MM min.
rear are 10mm think and needs to be 8.3MM thick.
here is the specs for USA C300. (this does not apply to canadian C300. dont know about rest of world)

Last edited by qaz393; Dec 12, 2011 at 08:59 PM.


where did i say i cannot afford them??? i rather go for centric rotors because they have e-coating on their rotors. useful in the salty winter where i live. even the oem rotors have a similar black coating. i do not see any brembo (one piece) rotors have this technology/feature at any price.Sorry...misread.

I would definately get the brake flush done at 2 years due to warranty purposes.
your rotors will need to be replaced if they have thickness variation or are too thin. the wear tolerance for the rotors are 2.5mm total. its better to be safe than to cheap out.
front rotors are normally 28MM thick and needs to be 25.4MM min.
rear are 10mm think and needs to be 8.3MM thick.
here is the specs for USA C300. (this does not apply to canadian C300. dont know about rest of world)


its probably within .1MM of each otherr because i am 100% sure that thte front rotors are not 27.9 but 28MM...

Also, another myth is that Brembo by default is mucho expensive. For BBKs (many-pot calipers and multi-piece rotors) that's certainly true, but I do recall buying plane-jain Brembo rotors for my other cars throughout the years for the same price as any other brand.
At the end of the day, rotors are just hunks of metal, so unless the manufacturing process had extremely low quaility control, you're gonna be fine with whatever you end up choosing.
Pads? Well, that's a whole 'nuther debate and depends on what you're after...
Also, another myth is that Brembo by default is mucho expensive. For BBKs (many-pot calipers and multi-piece rotors) that's certainly true, but I do recall buying plane-jain Brembo rotors for my other cars throughout the years for the same price as any other brand.
At the end of the day, rotors are just hunks of metal, so unless the manufacturing process had extremely low quaility control, you're gonna be fine with whatever you end up choosing.
Pads? Well, that's a whole 'nuther debate and depends on what you're after...
poswerslot or stoptech offer a drilled rotor with specific left and right side design so that each rotor can blow hot air towards the outside.
for pads, what ever doesnt dust the most and cost the best will do the job. also no noise.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
poswerslot or stoptech offer a drilled rotor with specific left and right side design so that each rotor can blow hot air towards the outside.
for pads, what ever doesnt dust the most and cost the best will do the job. also no noise.
Also, you say that the stock design is garbage and are worrying about which direction the air blows, but then when it comes to pads, which are the more important piece of the braking puzzle, you say whatever costs the least, dusts the least, and is quiet is what you're after?
I will always choose a pad the provides the best (for my tastes!) stopping power and will live with having to wash the car more often to both clean and get rid of the squeaks. Granted, I don't want a pad that will chew up the rotors in 5k miles, but you get the idea.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 13, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
other than that, most of the time, there is nothing wrong with OE stuff.

poswerslot or stoptech offer a drilled rotor with specific left and right side design so that each rotor can blow hot air towards the outside.
for pads, what ever doesnt dust the most and cost the best will do the job. also no noise.
other than that, most of the time, there is nothing wrong with OE stuff.

Just to put things into perspective. Not a single American braking component company is represented in South Africa. The odd Hawk pad finds it's way here & are considered to be crap.
The most popular pads & rotors here in the general consumer market are Ferodo (made here) & Ate (Alfred Teves - made here & imported) & probably EBC. All the rest are European with some Japanese. Of course Brembo is here.
Much of this is to support Benz, BMW, VW/Audi, Toyota, Nissan, Opel etc who all have plants here & build cars here. 99% of these cars in South Africa run OE brakes due to all being under Mobilodrive/Motorplan here. SA consumes over 66% of the number of Benz cars sold in the US every year & BMW holds it's highest market share of any global market in SA - even higher than their German MS - so we are not a small market for these guys. This is remarkable for a country with just over 50 million people.
We have no trouble stopping anything from busses & trucks to passenger cars & race cars & motorcycles in this racing mad country. We travel a lot faster on the open road here than people do on US Interstates. This is nothing to be proud of as we have a horrendous death toll on our roads. Very few of our poor accident statistics have anything to do with brakes. When they do it is almost always due to bad maintenance of brakes on open road coaches.
Don't make a big issue of brakes. They were well sorted out by the OEMs years ago. There has not been a decent development in braking since ABS. Most things today are tack-on's to ABS - even disc/rotor wiping systems are really old hat. Stoptech is small fry in global terms.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 13, 2011 at 06:06 PM.
A question I have previously asked, why my rotors ( on current wear) will be worn below specs before the pads are 50 %.?
I can't really get my head around the answer of it being caused by the way I drive . ie with anticipation & light aplication.
The OEM pads under my conditions are obviously too hard for the rotors.
A question I have previously asked, why my rotors ( on current wear) will be worn below specs before the pads are 50 %.?
I can't really get my head around the answer of it being caused by the way I drive . ie with anticipation & light aplication.
The OEM pads under my conditions are obviously too hard for the rotors.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 13, 2011 at 06:26 PM.


The front rotors were 28mm when new. Rears (solid) 10mm new .
At the 50,000 km inspection:- The front rotors measured 27 mm.Limit 25.4mm
-The rear rotors measured 9 mm. Limit 8.3.mm
Thickness left on front pads inner/outer average=11.6mm from 13mm
Thickness left on rear pads inner/outer average = 10.25mm from 12mm
At the current wear rate of wear the :-
Front rotors will be at limits when the pads are still 72%.
Rear rotors will be at limits when pads are still 75%.
So at present wear rate I will need to change the rear rotors at 85,000 km & the fronts at 130,000km.
Disappointing when considering the light use.
Last edited by Carsy; Dec 14, 2011 at 04:28 AM.

That said - If I compute my C240 just sold. City to intra urban car - lots of braking but modest. Enough braking to even front & rear tyre wear to almost identical at centre of tread. Standard sliding calipers
Front rotors would have needed changing by 130,000Km's with 3 sets of OE pads but some life left on pads.
Rear rotors at a guess would have gone 160,000Km with 1 pad change and a lot of meat on the pads remaining.
I did drive with a caliper over return situation on the rear for a while (about 20,000Km) after the first front pad change before correcting by bleeding & stomping on the brakes to regain pedal height & feel. This might have protected my rears slightly for a while.
Wear is very service orientated. I would say your front rotor life is in the ball park. Your rear is unusual.
It's possible that your very light braking is tending to glaze your pads & protect them a little vs the rotors.
I will keep an eye on the C240 & report. Now owned by a close friend.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Dec 14, 2011 at 06:56 AM.
I think the glazing theory could be correct.
Comparing our tyre wear .My rears were at wear strip at 34,000 km.
The fronts were 2.75 mm above wear strip so should have made around 60,000km if not for tyre splitting failure .
I consider this normal for my rear wheel drives. The old Pugs always achieved 60,000km on the front & 40,000 on the rear.Same country driving.




