C250 Fuel Mileage?




I reset the "lifetime" economy when it hit 1,000 miles and my intent is to not reset it ever again. It said 21.4MPG average when I parked it earlier today.
The feeling when it is spooled up and pulling in 3rd and 4th gear is too addicting for my numbers to ever improve.
I reset the "lifetime" economy when it hit 1,000 miles and my intent is to not reset it ever again. It said 21.4MPG average when I parked it earlier today.
The feeling when it is spooled up and pulling in 3rd and 4th gear is too addicting for my numbers to ever improve.
If you go with the smaller wheels and keep it around 68-70 I've heard claims of 33mpg.




It definitely doesn't like stop and go traffic - and it seems that I get better mileage by not dragging out acceleration. Get it up to speed and let it get into 4th+gear where it's not really working and your numbers will come up.
It doesn't seem to like super gentle acceleration - at least by the numbers, that is.
Trending Topics
It definitely doesn't like stop and go traffic - and it seems that I get better mileage by not dragging out acceleration. Get it up to speed and let it get into 4th+gear where it's not really working and your numbers will come up.
It doesn't seem to like super gentle acceleration - at least by the numbers, that is.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG


I think it's because my commute consist of hill climbs and I seem to get better fuel economy using "S". Maybe because lightly feathering 1st gear is better than depressing 2nd gear heavily when it comes to hills/stop and go.




I keep my center display set on the consumption graph most of the time - the miles to empty becomes hypersensitive when the tank is at 1/4 or lower.
You may remember Top Gear ran a V8 M3 around a test track, along with some 4cyl car a few years back. The M3 actually got better mileage. More motor, less work. A good reason to get the biggest motor available next time.
You may remember Top Gear ran a V8 M3 around a test track, along with some 4cyl car a few years back. The M3 actually got better mileage. More motor, less work. A good reason to get the biggest motor available next time.
Its a good thing we don't live on a track then right? I drive my C250 very hard and manage decent mileage. As far as I'm concerned bigger engines = worse gas mileage in the city.
I see what you're saying though, the c250 is like 3428lbs? With the coupe and the 350 weighing more, so the turbo 4 could be using more gas to get the car moving.
. But if they were both pushed to the max then we would see a difference for sure.




Most of the time, the smaller engine is going to be more economical assuming it is being driven within normal operating parameters and not getting revved until the pistons shoot through the hood.
Around town in E, it's not that common to get the C250 over 4,000 RPM unless your foot is rather deep in the throttle. Point being - it's hardly working around town to move the car, and at least in the case of the C - the 44 ft/lb torque and 72 horsepower all come higher in the rev range on the V6 than the 4 cylinder.





