C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

M276 done soon?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-15-2014, 09:13 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spyked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 469
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2013 W204, 2015 X204
M276 done soon?

I see the W205 will use turbo 4 and turbo 6 engines in the U.S. It seems like they just introduced the M276 for C300/C350. Will the 276 continue in the E class? Or do we think that engine is doomed to be the MB engine that is used to shortest time?

It's basically a Pentastar with DI, right? Is there a reason they put all that money into it and decided to not use it?
Old 01-15-2014, 09:38 AM
  #2  
Member
 
tonyteetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C300 sport 4matic
My guess is that they will use them in E class for further distinction from the C class.
So if one don't like the turbo engine options of the C , then move up to the E. Mercedes profit from the up sale.

Last edited by tonyteetime; 01-15-2014 at 09:43 AM.
Old 01-15-2014, 12:17 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
JaredP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 670
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2014 E63 AMG S
The M276 is in GLKs and SLKs too.
Old 01-15-2014, 01:43 PM
  #4  
Member
 
tonyteetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C300 sport 4matic
Originally Posted by JaredP
The M276 is in GLKs and SLKs too.
Right , I forgot about those.

I think 2013 &2014 c300 owner got a sweet deal with having M276 engine in our cars !
Old 01-15-2014, 04:10 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spyked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 469
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2013 W204, 2015 X204
The GLK will lose the M276 as well since the W205 is. Assuming the next GLK will be a C Class like the current one is - W204 = X204. W205 will spawn the X205, right?

I wonder what was wrong with it that they only kept it around for a few years. The M272 and M271 were around forever by comparison.
Old 01-15-2014, 04:29 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
snowmuch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63 AMG
I think the new 3.0 v6tt will blow the current 3.5 DI v6 out of the water...no point keeping it.
Old 01-15-2014, 04:55 PM
  #7  
Member
 
tonyteetime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 C300 sport 4matic
Done ? I don't think so . I will bet any one $100 us dollar that M276 engine will still be available in 2015 Mercedes line up. Any takers?

Last edited by tonyteetime; 01-15-2014 at 04:58 PM.
Old 01-15-2014, 07:03 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
WhyAskWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2022 EQS 450+ until my 580 comes in
In the United States, the new C-Class will launch with a choice of two engines. The C300 will be fitted with a 2.0-liter turbocharged and directed-injected 2.0-liter four-cylinder capable of 235 horsepower and 273 lb-ft of torque, while the up-level C400 will sport a 3.0-liter V6 - also turbocharged and direct-injected - good for 329 horsepower and a stout 354 lb-ft of twist.

http://www.leftlanenews.com/mercedes...lass-2015.html

I'm still getting the 2014 C300 (should be delivered this month):
1) Tuscaloosa has never built a C class before
2) It's a new model year
3) Tuscaloosa in general does not have a great reputation for building reliable products
4) I don't like the nav screen
Old 01-15-2014, 10:00 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Originally Posted by tonyteetime
Done ? I don't think so . I will bet any one $100 us dollar that M276 engine will still be available in 2015 Mercedes line up. Any takers?
The 2015 GLK will still be X204 so likely retain the M276. Same for 2015 E and SLK.

Most likely the next gen GLK X205, E W213, and SLK will get the new 2.0 and 3.0 TT. So the M276 will still likely be on sale for 2 to 3 more years. Since it went on sale in 2012, that's about a 6 year run, which is about normal.
Old 01-15-2014, 10:41 PM
  #10  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Benz has stated that all engines in all models will be turbo by end of 2014.
Old 01-15-2014, 10:49 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Doesn't that mean they have to spend the $$ to re-certify a few models that will be replaced in a year or two in the US?
I thought it cost millions to certify a chassis with a new drive train?
Old 01-15-2014, 10:58 PM
  #12  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
The new engines will have to be homologated in the US. As Benz sells a restricted range in the US they are probably OK doing it.

This statement is in the Mercedes Benz Magazine that we all get as owners in South Africa.
Old 01-15-2014, 11:02 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
Don't get me wrong Glyn, I believe what you are saying.

It just doesn't make financial sense to spend the money to re-certify a new drive train in the GLK that will likely be replaced in a year, and the E class in a couple of years.

Maybe standardizing to fewer engines saves them more in the long run than the cost of re-certifying.
Old 01-15-2014, 11:26 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
The new E Class (facelifted) already has the Turbo engines in SA. The NA units have been dropped.

This is our engine range. All Turbo.

E200

E250

E250 CDI

E300 BlueTEC Hybrid

E350 BlueTEC

E400

E500

E63 AMG

E63 AMG S
Old 01-15-2014, 11:30 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
JaredP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Alberta
Posts: 670
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2014 E63 AMG S
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
The new E Class (facelifted) already has the Turbo engines in SA. The NA units have been dropped.

This is our engine range. All Turbo.

E200

E250

E250 CDI

E300 BlueTEC Hybrid

E350 BlueTEC

E400

E500

E63 AMG

E63 AMG S
E63s are 5.5L TT V8s, E400s are 3L TT V6, what is the E500?
Old 01-15-2014, 11:55 PM
  #16  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
4.7 litre Twin Turbo V8
Old 01-16-2014, 08:27 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
spyked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 469
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
2013 W204, 2015 X204
I tend to lament the concept of an all FI lineup. I have had turbos in a large portion of my cars...but sometimes you just don't want the hassle of a turbo.

In the U.S., that means you have to buy Japanese, as even the domestics are FI now for the most part.
Old 01-16-2014, 08:47 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
WhyAskWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2022 EQS 450+ until my 580 comes in
Originally Posted by spyked
I tend to lament the concept of an all FI lineup. I have had turbos in a large portion of my cars...but sometimes you just don't want the hassle of a turbo.

In the U.S., that means you have to buy Japanese, as even the domestics are FI now for the most part.
I've always had a naturally aspirated V6. What is the hassle of a turbo other than turbo lag? With a twin turbo, is the lag noticeable? Are forced induction engines less reliable?
Old 01-16-2014, 09:23 AM
  #19  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,942
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Forced induction engines are thoroughly reliable these days. The E400 Coupe that I drove has zero lag.

With emissions & fuel consumption being the drivers this is where things will go. Lower capacity FI.
Old 01-16-2014, 03:09 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
thenew3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,283
Received 126 Likes on 105 Posts
2020 X7 xDrive40i, 2016 X3 sDrive28i
I actually prefer FI engines as they give you better low end torque. Most modern FI engines have very little to no lag. and modern turbos are very reliable.
Having more low end torque means your engine doesn't have to work as hard and in theory should make it last longer. not to mention better fuel economy.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: M276 done soon?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.