Comfort/sport mode makes no sense, from a fuel efficiency standpoint.
It is a pretty fundamental understanding that the more gears you have for a transmission the better the fuel economy is. This makes sense - anyone who has ever ridden a bike will know that the more gears you have = the easier it is for you to get started, and once you get going, the more gears you have = the less hard you have to work. It is also a generally accepted understanding that a 9 speed gearbox is more fuel efficient than a 4 speed gearbox, but probably less efficient than a CVT which has 1400+ settings.
Anyways, why then, is it also accepted that using Comfort mode on all MB sedans, such as the W204 is the more fuel efficient of the two (versus sport mode)? In C mode, you're starting off with second gear, thus bypassing first gear altogether. It would appear to me that starting off in first gear is more fuel efficient. That said, I do understand that Sport mode holds gears longer, and thus causes a drop in fuel mileage, but why didn't MB start off C mode in first gear, and continue to have it do what it does now, which is to upshift as early as possible?
Either the German engineers are idiots, or I am, and it's most likely the latter, but I still don't get this.
As for the bike analogy (I'm a recreational cycler as well), no one starts in 1st (aka the granny gear).




It does that little rpm flourish thing and shifts at like 5mph or something, so I'm sure the action of shifting itself is less fuel efficient than starting at lower rpm's in second gear.
That said, it seems to me this first gear is pretty useless then. Not sure why MB even bothered with the first gear, because as was pointed out upthread, other carmakers actually use their first gear. wtf was MB thinking?
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

I do use Comfort mode a lot for --comfort, not because the shift from 1 to 2 is not smooth, but because I would need to worry less about throttle finesse especially when pulling in and out of tight parking spaces and where precision is needed.
That said, it seems to me this first gear is pretty useless then. Not sure why MB even bothered with the first gear, because as was pointed out upthread, other carmakers actually use their first gear. wtf was MB thinking?
Why would it be useless? If you decide to start quickly, you will need 1st gear. Aren't we discussing Comfort mode? If you are driving on Comfort mode, I guess you want to feel comfortable. I do not get your point at all.
I take it that you’ve probably never driven a stick shift. If you stay in first gear, it is twitchy, very sensitive, very abrupt acceleration etc. All of which is not elegant and smooth. Think if someone trying to take a drink from a glass of water while you’re about to drive.. more likely they’ll spill if you start in gear 1.
Does that mean gear 1 is useless? No. There are many instances where starting in gear 1 is useful, such as the need to overtake the car next to you when the light turns green, etc.




The E setting got my attention early (a 440 mile round trip to Carmel which calc'd out at just under 35 MPG. Made my day/weekend).
Nice car.
ez
Last edited by ezshift5; Mar 12, 2018 at 11:08 AM.








I had a 2003 E320 and the "C" was "W" as noted by xsever. Somewhere between there and 2013 that change was made. That earlier car also had the 2 reverse gears (722.6 5 speed transmission). i believe the owner's manual said it was for backing on icy roads in winter just like the starting in second, because it selected the higher of the two reverse gears in "W."
Compared to the E320, the C250 is like a rocket powered skate board (lighter car, same torque at lower engine speed, and better gearing), so either selection is better than the 5 speed.
Interesting explanation for my W204's reverse gears..would apply if in "C" mode only then I suppose or not?





