C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

Just test drove the new 2015 C class

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-17-2014, 04:22 PM
  #26  
Junior Member
 
C400Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 C400 AMG line on order Oct 2014, 2009 Hyundai Genesis 4.6, 2007 Acura TSX
Originally Posted by NYC-Style
The infotainment display is indeed impressive...the demo I drove had the multimedia package so the display was larger. I plan on going back for another test drive this week. I'm surprised they're telling you early to mid Sept with an Aug 28th build. I have a Aug 2nd build with a mid to late Sept delivery. But if something comes in sooner that meets my needs/wants I may go with that....
Yes I dunno if he was bsing with the arrival date...originally it was early oct
Old 08-17-2014, 09:43 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,236
Received 986 Likes on 722 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
One other comment I wanted to mention is that after I drove the w204 which was after the W205 I drove a 2012 E3504 matic. With all the commentary about how luxurious the W205 is the W212 still felt like a richer place to be.
Old 08-17-2014, 11:33 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
teja1936's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney AUSTRALIA
Posts: 67
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2010 Calcite C300 with AMG Sports Package
Originally Posted by C400Driver
That's where they cheap out unfortunately.... I've seen various Ford cars and the brand new 2015 gm trucks with separate led positive amber turn signals!!!!.. But the Germans aside from the BMW 7 series can't be bothered... On A positive note the headlight led turn signals don't turn off the DRLs!!!!
Sorry to say, but I doubt that it’s a German thing. Rather I believe it to be a US marketing ploy to market the vehicle to a price for the US buyers. With respect to vehicles here in Oz, premium or not, they all have amber indicators front and back. Amber indicators have been on Benzes since the Dead Sea was only sick.
Old 08-18-2014, 12:49 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
alsyli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 C250 Sport
Originally Posted by MBNUT1
With all the commentary about how luxurious the W205 is the W212 still felt like a richer place to be.
B/c of the interior ambiance, the way the car drove, or both?
Old 08-18-2014, 05:28 PM
  #30  
Super Member
 
MB-JIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: North Scottsdale
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 C 350 2014 GLK350
I drove a C300 this morning in Scottsdale, AZ. My greatest concern was resolved and that was concerning the 4 cylinder turbo engine. In driving around town, on surface streets, I felt the engine response was fine with no objectionable turbo lag. For me, I would see no need to go for the 400.
The steering was firm and responsive. The 8.4" Command screen was excellent and it didn't block the windshield. The car was very quiet but that was at surface street speeds. The Burmeister sound had more bass than my HK systems. Overall visibility seemed a lot better than in my GLK.
I still need to drive one, on a freeway, to see how the engine responds at highway speeds.
If I order one it will be a C300 Luxury model with two wheel drive.
Old 08-18-2014, 07:48 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,236
Received 986 Likes on 722 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by alsyli
B/c of the interior ambiance, the way the car drove, or both?
My comment was the interior ambiance (to be fair the car was black on black with tinted windows so that conveyed a certain elegance that the silver on black W205 didn't possess) but for sure the way it drove was more Mercede's like. It felt special.
Old 08-19-2014, 11:36 AM
  #32  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
I believe that Benz traditionalists like MBNUT & myself are going to have a hard time liking the lighter cars that Benz is forced to make for the sake of fuel efficiency. Weight adds to the feel we like in the cars. The W205 is on average over 100Kg's lighter than a W204 (Benz claim) due to the greater use of lightweight, high strength materials. It is impressive that they have achieved the level of comfort they have in the W205 considering it is lighter. Well tuned, well damped steel suspension or air suspension are to thank on other than Sport models which I find jarringly firm especially with large diameter wheels & very low profile tyres.

The younger demographic that like a Sporty feel will live with the discomfort & love the lighter weight because it makes the vehicle more chuckable.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 08-19-2014 at 12:28 PM.
Old 08-19-2014, 12:46 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
 
C400Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 C400 AMG line on order Oct 2014, 2009 Hyundai Genesis 4.6, 2007 Acura TSX
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
I believe that Benz traditionalists like MBNUT & myself are going to have a hard time liking the lighter cars that Benz is forced to make for the sake of fuel efficiency. Weight adds to the feel we like in the cars. The W205 is on average over 100Kg's lighter than a W204 (Benz claim) due to the greater use of lightweight, high strength materials. It is impressive that they have achieved the level of comfort they have in the W205 considering it is lighter. Well tuned, well damped steel suspension or air suspension are to thank on other than Sport models which I find jarringly firm especially with large diameter wheels & very low profile tyres.

The younger demographic that like a Sporty feel will live with the discomfort & love the lighter weight because it makes the vehicle more chuckable.
you forget a lighter more powerful vehicle=more speed... The c400 can get to 60 in 4.6 secs in sport+ mode...which is very impressive considering its in a stock tuned state.... This is a smaller sportier car there is no reason for this case to be 4000+ lbs...I welcome lightening... But I'm also a motorsports enthusiast
Old 08-19-2014, 01:06 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
The weight isn't what gives a Mercedes its feel, it is the suspension, steering, seats, most importantly the air tight build quality. This thing about sheer weight giving feel is just an outdated perception. Weight is just weight and excess weight is just that. You can get the same tank like feeling from a lighter Mercedes. It is the build and the tuning of the various components that give the feel.

M
Old 08-19-2014, 01:21 PM
  #35  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by Germancar1
The weight isn't what gives a Mercedes its feel, it is the suspension, steering, seats, most importantly the air tight build quality. This thing about sheer weight giving feel is just an outdated perception. Weight is just weight and excess weight is just that. You can get the same tank like feeling from a lighter Mercedes. It is the build and the tuning of the various components that give the feel.

M
The perception might be outdated but it is there with traditionalists & it is certainly responsible for some of the feel that those traditionalists like.

Just open a new lightweight door on a W205. It is a completely competent door but it will never feel or thunk like a heavy door. Jaguar had exactly the same issues when they took the XJ's from steel to aluminum contruction. They felt less substantial. The fact that the entire structure was more stiff was overlooked by the buying public.

Marketing departments struggle with these issues of perception daily.
Old 08-19-2014, 01:36 PM
  #36  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by C400Driver
you forget a lighter more powerful vehicle=more speed... The c400 can get to 60 in 4.6 secs in sport+ mode...which is very impressive considering its in a stock tuned state.... This is a smaller sportier car there is no reason for this case to be 4000+ lbs...I welcome lightening... But I'm also a motorsports enthusiast
+1^ ~ no I did not forget. I too love motorsport. I just want my daily driver to be a bit of a tank & my weekend fun run car to be something accessible like a Honda S2000 or a Boxster S or similar.

At the same time I can appreciate my old tank like Jaguar S Type manual overdrive for what it was in 1965. 0 to 100 Kph in 10 seconds, Door armrest digging you in the butt on hard cornering & the pleasant smell of Connolly hide, Wilton carpets, lambswool Union Cloth headlining & acres of Burr Walnut.

The marque I love the most is Aston Martin. That should tell you something about where my tastes are if money were not a consideration. Old DB6 or new stock DB9 would do just fine.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 08-19-2014 at 01:40 PM.
Old 08-19-2014, 02:10 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
The perception might be outdated but it is there with traditionalists & it is certainly responsible for some of the feel that those traditionalists like.

Just open a new lightweight door on a W205. It is a completely competent door but it will never feel or thunk like a heavy door. Jaguar had exactly the same issues when they took the XJ's from steel to aluminum contruction. They felt less substantial. The fact that the entire structure was more stiff was overlooked by the buying public.

Marketing departments struggle with these issues of perception daily.

You're still missing the point, it isn't just the heft of the door, it is the construction of the door. No car maker is making heavy doors anymore and really how much of a bank vault do you expect on car like the C-Class? Those traditionalist are just going to have to get used to it. When you increase equipment like on the new C you increase weight, but that weight has to be taken out somewhere otherwise you wind up with an overweight car that drives like an old school Benz way too stodgy for today's customer/market.

M
Old 08-19-2014, 02:22 PM
  #38  
Super Member
 
alsyli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2012 C250 Sport
Originally Posted by Germancar1
You're still missing the point, it isn't just the heft of the door, it is the construction of the door. No car maker is making heavy doors anymore and really how much of a bank vault do you expect on car like the C-Class? Those traditionalist are just going to have to get used to it. When you increase equipment like on the new C you increase weight, but that weight has to be taken out somewhere otherwise you wind up with an overweight car that drives like an old school Benz way too stodgy for today's customer/market.

M


I agree w/ both you and Glyn, BUT....

The old 190e had the same bank value door slam that has characterized all MBs....

AND....

The old 190e was still considerably lighter than the W205.


For me, a classic MB feeling is about bank-vault solidity, unruffled high-speed behavior, a fantastic ride/handling balance w/ some roll softness, and an astere but high-quality interior. You'll note that speed is not one of the things that make an MB, IMHO. I leave the lurching aggression to BMW.


And also, IMHO, they haven't made a classic MB since the W202....

Last edited by alsyli; 08-19-2014 at 02:25 PM.
Old 08-19-2014, 05:38 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,236
Received 986 Likes on 722 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
I believe that Benz traditionalists like MBNUT & myself are going to have a hard time liking the lighter cars that Benz is forced to make for the sake of fuel efficiency. Weight adds to the feel we like in the cars. The W205 is on average over 100Kg's lighter than a W204 (Benz claim) due to the greater use of lightweight, high strength materials. It is impressive that they have achieved the level of comfort they have in the W205 considering it is lighter. Well tuned, well damped steel suspension or air suspension are to thank on other than Sport models which I find jarringly firm especially with large diameter wheels & very low profile tyres.

The younger demographic that like a Sporty feel will live with the discomfort & love the lighter weight because it makes the vehicle more chuckable.
Complete concurrence and as an engineer it isn't that I don't appreciate reduced weight and amount of engineering required to produce a lighter weight solution. In my business one lb in a 5000 lb product is worth a lot.

All I know is that I drove a 2011 E350 4matic luxury and it felt just how I expected a Benz to feel.

From the steering weight and liquid smoothness to the unerring straight line stability to the roll softness to the vault like solidity to the nearly silent and smooth engine and seamless transmission and when pressed it was able to make good report of itself on the off ramp.

The trades with the W205 for me are styling (really think the luxury W205 is beautiful, fortunately I don't have to look at the mess of the front end of a W212 when I'm driving it), fuel efficiency and larger size than I need or really want but that is becoming the price I am willing to pay for the enjoyment of the driving experience.

Last edited by MBNUT1; 08-19-2014 at 05:46 PM.
Old 08-19-2014, 05:52 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,236
Received 986 Likes on 722 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by alsyli
I agree w/ both you and Glyn, BUT....

The old 190e had the same bank value door slam that has characterized all MBs....

AND....

The old 190e was still considerably lighter than the W205.


For me, a classic MB feeling is about bank-vault solidity, unruffled high-speed behavior, a fantastic ride/handling balance w/ some roll softness, and an astere but high-quality interior. You'll note that speed is not one of the things that make an MB, IMHO.
Had a 190 E and agree on all comments

Originally Posted by alsyli
leave the lurching aggression to BMW.


Originally Posted by alsyli
also, IMHO, they haven't made a classic MB since the W202....
I remember driving a W202 and thinking the the potholes were getting the worse end of the deal when I drove over them you had this sense of them being crushed by the car.
Old 08-19-2014, 06:28 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
esse22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 Porsche Panamera GTS
Had anyone heard when the C400 will be available for a test drive?
Thanks!
Old 08-19-2014, 06:41 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
InTheBenz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North/Central NJ
Posts: 1,305
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
GLC 63 S AMG / Corvette C8 / Jaguar SVR
DO we know what the C400 4matic weighs?

The xdrive automatic F30 335 weighs 3731 per motortrend (http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ve_first_test/)

I can't find the C400 weight....
Old 08-19-2014, 07:07 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
The C400 4Matic is lighter according to MBUSA:

3,583 lbs (4MATIC)

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...nt=model-specs


M
Old 08-19-2014, 07:58 PM
  #44  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by Germancar1
You're still missing the point, it isn't just the heft of the door, it is the construction of the door. No car maker is making heavy doors anymore and really how much of a bank vault do you expect on car like the C-Class? Those traditionalist are just going to have to get used to it. When you increase equipment like on the new C you increase weight, but that weight has to be taken out somewhere otherwise you wind up with an overweight car that drives like an old school Benz way too stodgy for today's customer/market.

M
I'm not missing the point at all. You choose to misconstrue.

Damn right we are going to have to get used to it. One day I will be driving a composite electric or whatever.

For now I choose something with greater substance.

I like the W205, as stated on another thread, I could be happy with a fully loaded, steel suspended C400 Exclusive with traditional grill & hoodstar.
Old 08-19-2014, 08:08 PM
  #45  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by MBNUT1
Complete concurrence and as an engineer it isn't that I don't appreciate reduced weight and amount of engineering required to produce a lighter weight solution. In my business one lb in a 5000 lb product is worth a lot.

All I know is that I drove a 2011 E350 4matic luxury and it felt just how I expected a Benz to feel.

From the steering weight and liquid smoothness to the unerring straight line stability to the roll softness to the vault like solidity to the nearly silent and smooth engine and seamless transmission and when pressed it was able to make good report of itself on the off ramp.

The trades with the W205 for me are styling (really think the luxury W205 is beautiful, fortunately I don't have to look at the mess of the front end of a W212 when I'm driving it), fuel efficiency and larger size than I need or really want but that is becoming the price I am willing to pay for the enjoyment of the driving experience.
+1 Fred. You and I are always on the same wavelength. A long PM on every Benz model in the last 15 years & more would seem proof of that.

Also owned a 190E 2.3 16, a W202 & a W203 ~ both 6's

Still love the drive in the new S Class which I have driven as S500 & S400 Hybrid at our launch day last year.

For now I'll stick to my 20,000 mile CLK.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 08-19-2014 at 08:31 PM.
Old 08-19-2014, 08:25 PM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
InTheBenz0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North/Central NJ
Posts: 1,305
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
GLC 63 S AMG / Corvette C8 / Jaguar SVR
Originally Posted by Germancar1
The C400 4Matic is lighter according to MBUSA:

3,583 lbs (4MATIC)

http://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/vehicl...nt=model-specs


M
Wow, I am even more excited to drive it. 150 lbs lighter than its exact 3 series competitor. 150 lbs is a good amount of savings... that car at 35XX lbs is no joke... aluminum frame goes a long way in weight savings and the car grew in size... I imagine it feels significantly better than its old W/C 204 Brother.
Old 08-19-2014, 08:48 PM
  #47  
Member
 
squid23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
E89 Z4
Did it have a manual mode for the transmission?
Old 08-19-2014, 09:00 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBNUT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,236
Received 986 Likes on 722 Posts
2010 E350 4Matic
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck

Still love the drive in the new S Class which I have driven as S500 & S400 Hybrid at our launch day last year.
I'm jealous.
Old 08-19-2014, 09:22 PM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
C400Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 C400 AMG line on order Oct 2014, 2009 Hyundai Genesis 4.6, 2007 Acura TSX
I've driven last gen S550 as well as current gen. S550..the C class is the closest thing you're getting to the S class until the new e class is released..period!
Old 08-19-2014, 09:26 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
NYC-Style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 332
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Corvette/2017 E-300
Went for "another" test drive today and had the chance to play with some of the infotainment features. It definitely will take some getting used to. I bought along my Passport 500GB portable hard drive...I keep music and videos on it. The videos played while the car was in park mode...the music played but it did not display the album art (it did identify the artist). Switched driving modes and could tell the difference between sport and comfort. I originally ordered a C300 with sport package...but decided to go with the C400 in which the sport package is standard. So I went from a mid/late Sept. delivery to early November...oh well...it'll be an early Christmas gift to myself.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Just test drove the new 2015 C class



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.