20" Niche wheels?
What do you guys think?
http://www.mhtwheels.com/mht-luxury-...l.cfm?id=14202
If it is a distinctive look, you want, then search out 19" wheels. There should be a lot to choose from.
I think they look great, similar to Vossens, I will go for Vossen myself once summer arrives, 8.5x20 and 10x20, most likely VFS-1 or CVT
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
He asked for people's opinion and I gave him mine.
The other option I'm thinking about is powercoating the wheels gunmetal.
Trust me, I want to stay with MB equipment. but, I just really think the car looks better with 20". I wish MB offered a 20" wheel that would fit.
All I heard when I had my 204 with 20.s was "OMG that must be a horrible ride!" if I had the time I offered the person a ride and that was always the end of that discussion, the ride is not affected as bad as one might think, please try it out before complaining about worsened drive quality.

So then, lets hear it from someone who knows automotive engineering?,
Why should a car designed for 19.s wont be able to handle 20"
Using the same tire circumference, (stock 235/40x19 to 235/35x20) the sidewall is 12.7mm thinner
20" rim weight often same or slightly higher than 19"
These are the only factors that could affect driving.
I assume you have used 20" wheels in a daily driver or similar, because how could you tell how the ride is otherwise?

In our local automotive press the New C Class with Sport Pack (AMG line) suspension fitted was resoundingly criticised for an "over firm ride that becomes uncomfortable on broken tarmac" They concluded that "The new C Class impresses on most fronts but avoid the sport suspension". This car was fitted with 18 inch wheels & in a country that generally likes more firmly suspended vehicles than the US & many others. Having personally driven that very test car I agree with them. This was on 40 & 45 profile tyres. Imagine how bad it would be on 35 or 30 profile tyres.
BTW ~ they loved the Airmatic suspension on the sister diesel powered test car also on 18" rims as set up for SA. This is impressive as they have been quite critical of previous generation Airmatic suspended cars in the range.
If one is numb or road surface is excellent then I guess it does not matter.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Oct 26, 2014 at 06:18 AM.
Also profile numbers without mentioning width says nothing as the tyre profile is a percentage of the tyre width in mm.s
Why not let pople try for themselves? everywhere I see flak on people using 20.s, how many of the people complaining have actually driven the very same car with 20.s mounted?
Stop pretending to know stuff if you havnt tried it out yourselves.

On any tyre size that one can realistically fit to a C Class, 30 & 35 profile sidewalls will compromise ride comfort. You can't escape the physics of the situation.
If people want to compromise ride for looks they are welcome. It's their car. The OP asked for an opinion & it has been given.
And these are the very same arguments I heard once aftermarket 17 and 18" wheels started to increase in popularity during the early 90.s
Still 17" must be considered the most common wheel size in serial production cars today.
What do you guys think?
http://www.mhtwheels.com/mht-luxury-...l.cfm?id=14202
And, as increases in wheel size usually (although not always) bring along a weight increase, all the issues of a heavier rotating unsprung mass take the car in the wrong direction with additional ride quality loss and reductions in acceleration, fuel economy, and braking capability. Some differences are perhaps small, but still directionally incorrect for the intended performance of the vehicle.
Just like the deleterious effect of high heels on a woman's foot, these may look good, but they are not good for you/the car. Your choice depends on your priorities.
And, now he knows what some of us think....


