C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

Airmatic - must have or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:40 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
whkento's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nagoya, Japan
Posts: 373
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'15 C200 AMG line, '08 C300 Sport Avantgarde, '07 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ltd, '02 CLK 200 (gone)
I've had mine for a few days now and love the airmatic. The difference between settings is very noticeable. Comfort setting is smooth around town. Sport + noticeably lowers the car & stiffens the ride. I'm very happy I got it.

...just hoping it holds up for a long time. Don't want to pay to fix it.
Old 01-28-2015, 02:11 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
rieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. The airmatic rides better than springs hands down.
2. If you lease or will sell the car within the warranty period get the airmatic.
3. If you plan on keeping the car get the spring setup and use the money for aftermarket coilovers like the Bilstein PSS10. Ride can be lowered but more importantly the PSS10 coilovers will give you a better ride than stock.
4. Read/search E-Class and S-class Airmatic problems and you will find you are guaranteed to run into Airmatic problems long term and that it is very very expensive to fix. I can guarantee it. I had airmatic suspension failures in both my E and S class.

Here is one on the main page on the w212 forum.

https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...eak-nhtsa.html

Airmatic problems is like dying it is guaranteed.
MB's airmatic seems to have more problems than most but other cars with airbag suspensions are also seeing failures. Search Panamera air suspension failure and any other car with this type of suspension and you will see same results.
Old 01-28-2015, 02:52 AM
  #128  
Member
 
solarflare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mercedes C300, BMW X5
Originally Posted by rieger
1. The airmatic rides better than springs hands down.
2. If you lease or will sell the car within the warranty period get the airmatic.
3. If you plan on keeping the car get the spring setup and use the money for aftermarket coilovers like the Bilstein PSS10. Ride can be lowered but more importantly the PSS10 coilovers will give you a better ride than stock.
4. Read/search E-Class and S-class Airmatic problems and you will find you are guaranteed to run into Airmatic problems long term and that it is very very expensive to fix. I can guarantee it. I had airmatic suspension failures in both my E and S class.

Here is one on the main page on the w212 forum.

https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...eak-nhtsa.html

Airmatic problems is like dying it is guaranteed.
MB's airmatic seems to have more problems than most but other cars with airbag suspensions are also seeing failures. Search Panamera air suspension failure and any other car with this type of suspension and you will see same results.
Mercedes is not alone in the airbag will eventually bleed air. I know BMW and Land Rover has reported similar issue. It is known wear item. Just replace the airbag. What is different about Mercedes vs. other brand?

Last edited by solarflare; 01-28-2015 at 02:54 AM.
Old 02-02-2015, 08:56 AM
  #129  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ManiacGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 52 Posts
BMW e89 Z4 sDrive 35i & MB S205 C200 AMG Premium Plus
Calling all AirMatic owners. Have any of you got this with 19" wheels and if so, what's the ride quality like? What sizes of wheels do you have any how is the ride on poor surfaces? (manhole covers, tarmac patches etc)
Old 02-02-2015, 11:13 AM
  #130  
Super Member
 
coladin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 911
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
2014 C63 507, 2012 R350
Originally Posted by ManiacGT
Calling all AirMatic owners. Have any of you got this with 19" wheels and if so, what's the ride quality like? What sizes of wheels do you have any how is the ride on poor surfaces? (manhole covers, tarmac patches etc)


I am very happy with it overall, although there can be a jarring effect with certain pothole bumps that feel awkward, but that's is a small price to pay for the overall excellent ride quality.
Old 02-05-2015, 11:03 AM
  #131  
Junior Member
 
yObOyGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C400
I ordered the Airmatic package with 19"s and i had driven the normal suspesion c400s, quite a few time may i add, and when i got my car (few days ago) i did not notive a difference in ride quality on the stock height to stock height. However when the Airmatic vehicle is raised the air quality is superb !

i ordered the package thinking i go also go lower, or that the agility settings would bring it a little lower. DISAPPOINTED !!

my previous car Audi S4 was really low, and i would like to get a littlw lower on my C400 without having to add a real Air Suspension
\Does anyone know a fix ?
Old 02-05-2015, 03:41 PM
  #132  
Super Member
 
DBOC205's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: BNE, Australia
Posts: 787
Received 105 Likes on 62 Posts
W205 C250BT
Originally Posted by yObOyGeo
i would like to get a littlw lower on my C400 without having to add a real Air Suspension
\Does anyone know a fix ?
Have a look at this:..
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...-airmatic.html
Old 02-16-2015, 12:05 AM
  #133  
Newbie
 
Wunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W205 C250
Relating to lowered sports suspension and airmatic. Is it possible to have both?

I live in Australia and the AMG line comes with lower sports suspension but I optioned the airmatic as well.

Does my optioning of the airmatic automatically get rid of lowered sports suspension?
Old 02-16-2015, 02:06 AM
  #134  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ManiacGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 52 Posts
BMW e89 Z4 sDrive 35i & MB S205 C200 AMG Premium Plus
Originally Posted by Wunz
Relating to lowered sports suspension and airmatic. Is it possible to have both?

I live in Australia and the AMG line comes with lower sports suspension but I optioned the airmatic as well.

Does my optioning of the airmatic automatically get rid of lowered sports suspension?
Yes and with all due respect you should have checked before buying.
Old 02-16-2015, 09:38 PM
  #135  
Senior Member
 
mihaelb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B200T
Originally Posted by ManiacGT
Yes and with all due respect you should have checked before buying.
In his defence, some of the dealers themselves don't know. I got two different answers whether "AMG sports package plus Airmatic means Airmatic that's lower", vs. "Airmatic is Airmatic, and is the same across all three trim levels"
Old 02-28-2015, 02:11 PM
  #136  
Newbie
 
Rbajoria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C200
Airmattic suspension

Originally Posted by Roger Bill
Hi all
Thanks for your helpful review. What about maintaince issue with Romaric vs steel? Any cost implications in long run?

Just like to add my test drive experiences comparing the steel and Airmatic suspensions. The bottom line is that I was impressed with the comfort and handling advantages of Airmatic and have ordered a C200 petrol Sport with Airmatic and the expected delivery date is late May 2015. Based on my test drives and from the many owners reports I've read online I’m confident it’ll be worth the wait.

Some background: I'm based in the UK where we have the choice of three steel suspension setups: SE has comfort suspension with 16" 205/60 tyres, Sport has comfort suspension lowered by 15mm on 17" 225/50 tyres and AMG Line which has sports suspension on 18" 225/45 and 245/40 run-flat tyres. Airmatic is an option on the Sport and AMG Line but I'm not sure whether the setup is the same or not. While I'm not a fast driver we do have a lot of twisty roads and I don't like a car that wallows through bends. Also our roads have an increasing number of pot-holes and speed bumps which cause me some problems as I have occasional back problems and therefore ride comfort is a high priority.

Unfortunately my test drives weren't directly comparable because they were in a Sport with steel suspension and an AMG Line with Airmatic. I found the steel suspension car wallowed a little too much for my liking whereas the Airmatic seemed ideal in this regard. Also, even on the lower profile run-flat tyres, the Airmatic seemed better able to absorb bumps. My only criticism of the Airmatic was that on gently undulating road surfaces at certain higher speeds there was a little pitching motion but this could be dialled out by switching from the comfort to sport setting. One operators manual states that in comfort setting the ride height is automatically lowered when the speed exceeds 80mph and it's raised back to the comfort height when the speed drops below 50mph. According to earlier posts in this thread it seems these change points might vary in different markets. The ability to switch settings was the other key reason that caused me to opt for Airmatic.

Having said all that, ride/comfort is clearly a matter of personal preference and, as mentioned in an earlier post, I think you certainly need at least a couple of hours trying the various Airmatic settings on familiar roads to make a reasonable assessment and to decide whether it's likely to suit your particular needs.

My only other reservation with regard to comfort was that after a couple of hours the AMG Line seats seemed uncomfortably hard. Although I spent less time driving the Sport version I didn’t find the same problem. I was told the two types of seat differ in shape but not firmness. Does anyone know whether this is the case or whether perhaps the seats become a little softer after some use (the Sport demonstrator had a higher mileage)? Alternatively I wonder if there is a specialist who can modify the seats by fitting slightly softer padding or something?
Hi any maintainance issue with airmattic or cost implication in long run
Old 02-28-2015, 02:45 PM
  #137  
Super Member
 
floridadriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2015 C300 RWD
Originally Posted by Rbajoria
Hi any maintainance issue with airmattic or cost implication in long run
Every option on the car will need some love at some point. Air suspensions have history of pricey fix if they break outside of warranty. Usually by then, there's aftermarket parts for air, or you can convert to steel suspension. Electrical gremlins and other build QA issues yet to surface are likely to kill your wallet before the air suspension will.
Old 02-28-2015, 10:46 PM
  #138  
Newbie
 
alnamdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBD
Airmatic also makes the car more wallowy and dampens steering feel. tbh, there is not THAT big a difference between airmatic and luxury coil...since coil is quicker to react, sometimes it feels less bumpy as well vs airmatic.

To me its not worth the sacrifice in steering, etc.
Old 02-28-2015, 11:23 PM
  #139  
Senior Member
 
PeteInGilroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Columbus, GA
Posts: 433
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
'18 GLC 300 4M/Air Suspension
Originally Posted by alnamdds
Airmatic also makes the car more wallowy and dampens steering feel. tbh, there is not THAT big a difference between airmatic and luxury coil...since coil is quicker to react, sometimes it feels less bumpy as well vs airmatic.

To me its not worth the sacrifice in steering, etc.
It's been reported that the C400 wallows, but not the C300. I find the C300 with Airmatic completely composed with no body lean...especially no nose diving during braking (in fact the nose doesn't move when braking). I could not be happier with the ride. I know some prefer the coil springs, but I would never go back!
Old 03-01-2015, 02:26 AM
  #140  
Senior Member
 
bartola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 366
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
CLA-250, C-300
After much research, I decided that it was a must have, so I ordered my vehicle. Dealers were saying "there are only 2 in the whole country", right, anyway. I decided to order exactly what I wanted, it will be built next week, that shipping time, looking at April delivery.
Old 03-01-2015, 03:08 AM
  #141  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vic viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,135
Received 267 Likes on 163 Posts
S213
Originally Posted by alnamdds
Airmatic also makes the car more wallowy and dampens steering feel. tbh, there is not THAT big a difference between airmatic and luxury coil...since coil is quicker to react, sometimes it feels less bumpy as well vs airmatic.

To me its not worth the sacrifice in steering, etc.




The Airmatic struts have steel springs inside them, with 100% airbags you would get a mushy ride, but it is not noticable in the W205
Old 03-01-2015, 11:11 AM
  #142  
Newbie
 
alnamdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBD
Originally Posted by vic viper
The Airmatic struts have steel springs inside them, with 100% airbags you would get a mushy ride, but it is not noticable in the W205
You can talk the parts all day long but the reality they both have trade-offs, significant enough for at least one buyer to mark off the air suspension.

Coil feels more accurate, responsive, and direct. I was worried I would be getting a bouncy ride, but on my C300 Luxury on any setting, there was barely a noticeable improvement in terms of smoothness over the roads.

Adjustable ride height is the big addition you get with Airmatic, if that's important to you.
Old 03-01-2015, 11:46 AM
  #143  
Member
 
kellens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
C300
Originally Posted by alnamdds
You can talk the parts all day long but the reality they both have trade-offs, significant enough for at least one buyer to mark off the air suspension.

Coil feels more accurate, responsive, and direct. I was worried I would be getting a bouncy ride, but on my C300 Luxury on any setting, there was barely a noticeable improvement in terms of smoothness over the roads.

Adjustable ride height is the big addition you get with Airmatic, if that's important to you.
If you're looking for a tight ride to the road, the w205 not the best pick of a car by far. They're all pretty lightly spung and cushy. The only real reasons to skip airmatic is your cost/budget, or availability if you want a car off the lot, since dealers can't get airmatic without special orders.
Old 03-01-2015, 11:59 AM
  #144  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
StanNH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Whitefield, NH
Posts: 1,822
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
2015 C300 Sport: Palladium, Premium, Multimedia, Leather, BLIS
Originally Posted by kellens
If you're looking for a tight ride to the road, the w205 not the best pick of a car by far. They're all pretty lightly spung and cushy. The only real reasons to skip airmatic is your cost/budget, or availability if you want a car off the lot, since dealers can't get airmatic without special orders.
My experience, based on six months with my own C300, is that the ride is anything but cushy. In fact, I find it on the firm side. I had a C300 Luxury as a loaner and found that almost as firm as the base steel suspension. "Lightly sprung and cushy" is not a description I'd personally use for any W205 I've ever driven, and there have been several.

There are many reasons to not go with Airmatic that go beyond simple cost. I chose to go with the steel suspension, because Airmatic was not what I wanted. I won't go into it, other than to say that there are three steel suspension choices and one air suspension choice. Drive them all if you can, read the available reviews online, and make an informed decision based on what you think you'd like in the car. I don't believe there's a bad choice, nor do I believe that owners who have opted for any of the steel suspensions did so because they couldn't afford Airmatic.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:21 PM
  #145  
Newbie
 
alnamdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBD
Originally Posted by kellens
If you're looking for a tight ride to the road, the w205 not the best pick of a car by far. They're all pretty lightly spung and cushy. The only real reasons to skip airmatic is your cost/budget, or availability if you want a car off the lot, since dealers can't get airmatic without special orders.
I never stated that I was looking for the best in any category. I drive many luxury cars, and upon considering the new C300 as a gift, I felt it was not worth it. Plus the noise the airmatics must make while raising and lowering is disconcerting, not to mention the reliability issues.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:30 PM
  #146  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
vic viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,135
Received 267 Likes on 163 Posts
S213
Originally Posted by alnamdds
I never stated that I was looking for the best in any category. I drive many luxury cars, and upon considering the new C300 as a gift, I felt it was not worth it. Plus the noise the airmatics must make while raising and lowering is disconcerting, not to mention the reliability issues.


The fact that you mention noise as a drawback tells me you havnt spent much time in an airmatic vehicle, the compressor and release valves are from standing next to the vehicle hardly noticable when the motor is running and when sitting inside the vehicle you cannot hear it at all.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:35 PM
  #147  
Member
 
kellens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
C300
Originally Posted by alnamdds
I never stated that I was looking for the best in any category. I drive many luxury cars, and upon considering the new C300 as a gift, I felt it was not worth it. Plus the noise the airmatics must make while raising and lowering is disconcerting, not to mention the reliability issues.
You don't sound very well informed on this option. At all.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:38 PM
  #148  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ManiacGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 52 Posts
BMW e89 Z4 sDrive 35i & MB S205 C200 AMG Premium Plus
Lol it's not a bus! Anyhow I'll give some feedback in a few weeks as mine (with airmatic) should arrive. My test cars were AMG spring (too hard) hence taking a risk on AirMatic.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:48 PM
  #149  
Newbie
 
alnamdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBD
Originally Posted by kellens
You don't sound very well informed on this option. At all.
I don't argue with simpletons on subjective matters. Onwards.
Old 03-01-2015, 12:51 PM
  #150  
Member
 
kellens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
C300
Originally Posted by alnamdds
I don't argue with simpletons on subjective matters. Onwards.
Who's arguing? Stating a fact. Your post shows you're ill informed on this option. That's all. Move along.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Airmatic - must have or no?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.