Aw, Man :(


The rear frame rails seem to have survived intact, but there's a lot of work to be done. I'll be surprised if I see the car back before 2017. I should have a dollar value on the first supplement tomorrow. Right now it's at $6,000 and my guess is it'll take double that before it's over.
Meanwhile I'm learning to like the MKZ, mainly because its audio system is really outstanding.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Then it will be welded in place, the seams sealed and the panel primed and painted. The copper colored material is weld-thru primer for corrosion protection.






In a hard hit, the trunk floor tends to cave inward and drag the frame rails inward with it. But in the 205, the composite tub that forms the floor is essentially a sacrificial part. Destroying it doesn't impact the underlying unibody structure at all, and it's not a load bearing component. Mine split open but the frame rails were unscathed.
The rails are the large longitudal box structures on either side of the tub.
Super easy while it's all stripped down....
the plastic trunk floor is a bit of a drum.... 😉
I used perhaps 3.5 sheets doing the trunk floor the trunk sides the inner face of the rear wings and behind the suspension towers etc. and the rear hatch (wagon remember).
I used approx 2 sheets doing under the rear seats area.
I used .5 sheets on the b pillars
And the remaining 3 sheets across the 4 doors...
I covered pretty much every available surface I could access single layer only with minimal gaps.
Hope that gives you an idea..
Attachment 342134
on my accident, the initial estimate was like $5.5k. they ended up paying like 12k~ish
the one time i was really happy to lease instead of buy.
For a publicly traded company, that figure is expressed as the Combined Operating Ratio (COR). The COR represents the money paid out in claims, plus the cost of their claims infrastructure (adjusters, offices, fixtures, computerized claims management equipment, private investigators, forensics, lawyer defense costs, legal settlements etc) expressed relative to a dollar in collected premium.
So a COR of 1.00 means the company spent in claims exactly what it earned in premium. A COR of 1.05 means it spend a nickle more on claims than it took in for each dollar of premium. Most companies run a negative COR in that 1.04 to 1.06 range. Progressive when I was there typically made a small underwriting profit with a COR around .97, or 3%, but that was an exception, and they had a very robust claims operation.
The actual way insurance companies make money is in their investment portfolios. They essentially take money in from policy holders and treat it like an interest free loan to buy and sell securities. It's the proceeds from those transactions that drives most of an insurance company's profits. For a publicly traded company, they also sell a crapload of stock.
But they have to maintain a level of liquidity (cash) to pay pending claims. This is known as the claim's "reserve". Reserves are funds that are not committed to the investment portfolio, and as a result aren't "working" for the insurance company. Managing reserves is a huge part of running a claim operation.
When a claim comes in and a coverage is opened (Property Damage, Bodily Injury, etc), the claims system typically sets a generic "system reserve". So say every Collision feature starts with a $3,000 system reserve based on the insurers own claims experience. The longer the claim is open (unpaid), the higher the system adjusts the reserve, since statistically the longer a claim is unpaid, the more expensive it becomes. In two months it could be $10,000. That's $10k not earning any income, multiplied by thousands and thousands of active exposures.
Claims managers are under pressure to keep their overall reserves low by settling claims quickly. This puts pressure on the claim reps to cut a settlement check, which automatically zeros out the reserve, because the system thinks the exposure is gone, or mostly gone. On a publicly traded company this helps the stock price, since analysts look at COR and Reserves.
So when a rep writes a $5,000 estimate and cuts the check to close the feature, but then has another supplemental expense of an additional $5,000, they've basically worked the reserve to improve the branch's performance numbers at the potential expense of inaccurate reserving. Do enough voo-doo with enough exposures and it's possible to be so radically under-reserved that the company gets hit with a big, unexpected, unreserved verdict that wipes them out (or triggers their re-insurance, with dooms the stock price).
Most systems do allow reps to manually post a reserve and stick it there until the claim is actually settled and closed. Progressive wanted accurate reserving whether it helped or hurt the performance metrics.









