AerowerkZ Keyless Entry System for W205 C-Class sedans
05-15-2017, 01:31 PM
#1
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
AerowerkZ Keyless Entry System for W205 C-Class sedans
AerowerkZ Motorsport is proud to announce keyless entry system for W205 C-Class sedans.
Driver's door panel removed to install door handle
Sensor installed on rear left door (same location as factory sensor)
Door handle and sensor wires connect to rear SAM
Install Guide (PDF)
- Lock and unlock your C-Class just by touching the driver's side door handle.
- No cutting of factory wiring harness.
- Price:
$699$499 (limited time offer) - FREE shipping to continental US for forum members.
- Driver's door handle available in white, silver or black.
- Comes with 1-year warranty.
- Professional installation is strongly recommended.
- Version coding is required after installation.
Driver's door panel removed to install door handle
Sensor installed on rear left door (same location as factory sensor)
Door handle and sensor wires connect to rear SAM
Install Guide (PDF)
Last edited by AerowerkZ; 08-08-2017 at 08:30 PM.
05-15-2017, 01:46 PM
#5
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
05-15-2017, 04:42 PM
#6
Trending Topics
05-26-2017, 12:08 PM
#8
Why?
http://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer...warranty-.html
Looks to me as if under the federal act MB, not the consumer, must show two things: a material modification, misuse or abuse, and a causal connection, not merely the existence of the same; otherwise, the practice would be deceptive or unfair under almost all state CPA schemes.
I expect MB lawyers know these things.
Poof is right. Any lawyer stupid enough to advise MB to deny a claim simply on proof of modification, etc. is overlooking many issues, including the likelihood that such a disclaimer or limitation is void as violative of public policy. That lawyer will disappear....
http://consumer.findlaw.com/consumer...warranty-.html
Looks to me as if under the federal act MB, not the consumer, must show two things: a material modification, misuse or abuse, and a causal connection, not merely the existence of the same; otherwise, the practice would be deceptive or unfair under almost all state CPA schemes.
I expect MB lawyers know these things.
Poof is right. Any lawyer stupid enough to advise MB to deny a claim simply on proof of modification, etc. is overlooking many issues, including the likelihood that such a disclaimer or limitation is void as violative of public policy. That lawyer will disappear....
Last edited by removedCFGaccount; 05-26-2017 at 12:21 PM.
