C218 CLS63, 2011 - 2019

2012 CLS runs 3.9 0-60 and 12.10 @ 121!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-26-2011, 10:41 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S
2012 CLS runs 3.9 0-60 and 12.10 @ 121!!!

Monster! ......yes please


http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/1106_2012_mercedes_benz_cls63_amg_test/transmission.html

Old 06-26-2011, 11:01 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sincity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vegas and Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,975
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
.
Damm...that is fast for stock!
Old 06-26-2011, 11:08 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Very quick for sure..very expensive too. I sat in a CLS the other day at the dealer and it was awesome, great quality and design. I think that people will run high 11's soon(time will tell). Once a tuner release a tune for this car we will probably see traps of mid to high 120's.
Old 06-26-2011, 11:15 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
KEMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 E63 PP, 2012 Ferrari 458, 2012 Boxster S
Absolutely love this car. Will be interesting to see what the new E63 will run. It's roughly 150 kg/300 lbs lighter than the CLS but packing the same punch. Now that will be a monster.

Ken
Old 06-26-2011, 11:21 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Quicktwinturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: AL,IL, GA, CA
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS, SLK, ETC
Had a chance to drive this on the track (performance event) and oh boy... This would be a perfect family car.
Exhaust note with a hint of turbo spooling = FTW
Old 06-26-2011, 12:59 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
There is one on the floor of my dealer. Beautiful car. 107K.
Old 06-26-2011, 03:21 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
enochroot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 G550
I cant wait to see what all the tuners have in store for the new 5.5 TT AMG engines.
Old 06-28-2011, 01:19 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
keikdasneak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E92 M3 DCT
amazing!!
Old 06-28-2011, 04:49 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ali_E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
already tuned to 620hp and will reach more after testing.

i think with feeing the cats off, can be reached 650 and more easily.
Old 06-28-2011, 11:25 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Centurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Originally Posted by Ali_E55
already tuned to 620hp and will reach more after testing.

i think with feeing the cats off, can be reached 650 and more easily.
Nice!
Old 06-29-2011, 04:04 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
siswati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'10 Panamera S, '06 AMG CLS55, '07 Miata MX5, '02 MB SPRINTER, '99 Spec Miata Race Car (2X)
$139,000 as tested..... WOW - thats getting dangerously close to the Panamera Twin Turbo price......hmmmmm is that Panny TT starting to look more attractive?!!?
Old 06-29-2011, 07:48 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
enochroot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 G550
Originally Posted by siswati
$139,000 as tested..... WOW - thats getting dangerously close to the Panamera Twin Turbo price......hmmmmm is that Panny TT starting to look more attractive?!!?
In my humble opinion the CLS63 looks much better then the Panamera Turbo - especially with it's fugly looking rear.

The Turbo S is another $30k...

The lines on the new CLS63 are gorgeous.
Old 06-29-2011, 10:39 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
Centurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Originally Posted by enochroot
In my humble opinion the CLS63 looks much better then the Panamera Turbo - especially with it's fugly looking rear.

The Turbo S is another $30k...

The lines on the new CLS63 are gorgeous.
Couldn't have said it better myself.

I don't know how the two cars compare in weight, but the Panamera sure looks like it's got a big ***...and it's not even an attractive one.
Old 06-30-2011, 08:01 PM
  #14  
Member
 
pdaplaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 CLS 63 AMG, 2009 Aston Martin Vantage, 1968 Camaro, 2003 GSXR-1000, 2007 Yamaha R1
What color is that in the pic above? Isn't this the same color from the CLS trailer video?
Old 06-30-2011, 10:01 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
Centurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Originally Posted by pdaplaya
What color is that in the pic above? Isn't this the same color from the CLS trailer video?
MB has a couple of colors that are fairly similar to the color you see above.
Steel grey and Palladium Silver.
Old 07-01-2011, 12:36 AM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jakpro1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Salt Lake City (but not Morm)
Posts: 7,092
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
2003 E55 & 2014 GL550
Can us po folk request some ballers hurry up and snag some 1 or 2 year leases. I am ready and waiting to snag one in bout 12-24 months.
Old 07-01-2011, 12:31 PM
  #17  
Super Member
 
Centurion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
LOL!
Old 07-02-2011, 08:43 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tjdehya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NM
Posts: 2,109
Received 249 Likes on 158 Posts
2023 EQS 580
Originally Posted by enochroot
In my humble opinion the CLS63 looks much better then the Panamera Turbo - especially with it's fugly looking rear.

The Turbo S is another $30k...

The lines on the new CLS63 are gorgeous.
I agree 100%. The Panamera is the ugliest thing from Porsche EVER!!!
Originally Posted by Jakpro1
Can us po folk request some ballers hurry up and snag some 1 or 2 year leases. I am ready and waiting to snag one in bout 12-24 months.
lol, I haven’t bought a used car in forever but I will second this request because I would love to have this toy but I definitely can’t afford this beast at MSRP.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2012 CLS runs 3.9 0-60 and 12.10 @ 121!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 PM.