C218 CLS63, 2011 - 2019

'12 CLS 63 Baseline Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-30-2011, 11:45 PM
  #51  
SGC
Senior Member
 
SGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL65
Originally Posted by callmiro
All your runs are telling you to put a stickier tire on your car

You're leaving 5 to 6 10ths in your 60 foot alone (your 2.3 vs Renntech 1.8 - and they could even run better if they launched harder or maybe used RaceStart)

The TC is going haywire cuz of the monstrous torque you're making in the basement and breaking your tires every time full boost comes on couple with proably a 1 wheel spin from no LSD from the non-PP

Your stats are saying your car should be side by side with the Renntech CLS...the only difference is the tires
Well said.
Old 10-31-2011, 05:26 PM
  #52  
Super Member
 
dbasons55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 976
Received 75 Likes on 44 Posts
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
Here's a vid I took of one of the runs. Watch the tach. It runs up to 4k when the TC ligh starts to flash, drops to 2.5k rpm and sounds like it's shifting but it's not as it's still in 1st, then runs up again still flashing and shifts into 2nd. Sorry about the vid but it's hard to hold a phone while driving. You can see in the vid the car bucking around trying to go but it just won't.
After watching your video i made a video of my car accelerating 0-180KM given that my car is also tuned and dynoed 579whp on a dyno jet, this will help u know if there is something wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnV63rL4YeU
Old 11-14-2011, 05:56 PM
  #53  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
I'm back on the dyno. Put a few hundred miles on the car with the tune and the weather conditions are close to the stuck run. Had a heck of a time getting a tach pickup. The car changes its signal when it boosts. What a pain. Its heat soaked pretty bad as we ran it a good 10 times trying to fix the tach. It put down 528/609 in this condition. Its cooling now so we'll see.

FYI Renntech is using uncorrected numbers in their dyno. I've asked for other data such as corrected numbers but they're silent on those.
Old 11-14-2011, 06:46 PM
  #54  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
570/619 final numbers.
Old 11-14-2011, 07:15 PM
  #55  
MBWorld God!

 
hyperion667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: 39.515509, -111.549668
Posts: 30,575
Received 3,355 Likes on 2,809 Posts
2012 CLS63
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
570/619 final numbers.

Old 11-14-2011, 07:34 PM
  #56  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
Those are sae corrected values which were corrected down. Uncorrected will be higher. I won't know till later tonight and I can plug the run files in the computer. No idea why the big jump, I changed nothing on the car. I did do the first after dyno with a little less than 15 miles on the tune.
Old 11-14-2011, 08:05 PM
  #57  
Super Moderator
 
BenzoBoi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W221
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
570/619 final numbers.
HOLY CRAP!!!
Old 11-14-2011, 09:19 PM
  #58  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
JumpinJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
Here you go. Graphs. Red line is stock. Green is right after the tune with about 15 miles on it. Blue is the one I just did today. Nothing on the car has changed except it has more miles. Same dyno. Go figure.

Old 11-14-2011, 09:34 PM
  #59  
Super Member
 
turbotom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SL63
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
Here you go. Graphs. Red line is stock. Green is right after the tune with about 15 miles on it. Blue is the one I just did today. Nothing on the car has changed except it has more miles. Same dyno. Go figure.

Wow, very impressive numbers !
Old 11-15-2011, 01:45 AM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ali_E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
i remember when Audi RS6 V10 TT was tuned, it showed higher numbers on dyno after each run, and also after couple of days driving. maybe there is something with German Turbo engines that they show higher numbers after a while.
Old 11-18-2011, 11:55 PM
  #61  
SGC
Senior Member
 
SGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL65
Originally Posted by JumpinJim
570/619 final numbers.
Still disappointed?

You weren't using 100 octane and replicated RENNtech's numbers. Isn't that interesting.

Notice how the schmuck conspiracy theorists have nothing to say now.

Get drag radials on your car and you'll run the times you should if you learn to launch it properly.
Old 11-19-2011, 12:03 AM
  #62  
SGC
Senior Member
 
SGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL65
Originally Posted by Thericker
No need for disapointment, still a great new motor from AMG & I'm certain free flowing exhaust/hi flo cats/CAI/Dwn Pipes/etc will yield 600+ rwhp 650+ rwtq

I said it on the RENNtech tuned ONLY thread "I'm betting RENNtech used more than 93 Octane to get the results they showed" (RENNtech stated 93 oct tune, I think it really is possible RENNtech tuned w/100+ oct to get those #'s, also considering BOTH baseline Dyno's were pretty close before BOTH tunes on NON Perf Pkg optioned vehicles) Though don't quote me on the last bit as I don't have time to dig up the RENNtech thread and cross refference OLD baseline Dyno #'s before Renn's ECU tune..

Yes, Dynos will vary but the #'s ie 21rwhp 44 rwtq MORE w/renntech's results would easily be replicated if 1 car was tuned for 93 oct vs 100+ I've seen Turbocharged vehicles (my own & others pick-up 20 rwhp from just adding 100+ octane to vehicle & allowing it to adapt to higher octane on it's own ie drive 10-odd miles & re-dyno same day same dyno, also seen plethora of other Turbo cars dyno 20-30 rwp more if tuning for 100+ oct vs 91-93 oct, Turbo app's LOVE race gas period. ..

Supercharged variants do react favorably to race gas too, but not to such a great degree..
Originally Posted by Thericker
They'd NEVER admit to either adding few gallons of 100+ oct or actually Tuning for 100+ @ this point...Tell ya what, go empty your current tank & refill w/100+ octane drive the vehicle @ least 10-15 miles then re-strapp to that same exact dyo see if you don't pick-up 20 rwhp, if NOT? Have them retune for a 100+ & guaranteed to see 20-30 rwp & about same TQ..

Reason you may NOT be able to pick-up 20 rwhp by just letting car adapt to higher octane vs specifically Tuning for 100+ Your new model has a myriad of differences vs my older v122tt, AMG may have set your engines ability to adapt to higher octane fuels again much differently than us older v12tt's...

Spoken like a typical uninformed jagoff with access to a keyboard.
Old 11-19-2011, 09:04 AM
  #63  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S
Originally Posted by SGC
Still disappointed?

You weren't using 100 octane and replicated RENNtech's numbers. Isn't that interesting.

Notice how the schmuck conspiracy theorists have nothing to say now.

Get drag radials on your car and you'll run the times you should if you learn to launch it properly.



Congrats on the huge numbers!
Old 11-19-2011, 09:17 AM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
ajag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 355
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
12 CLS63
Impressive, did you notice any seat of the pants difference from the earlier post tune runs to now?
Old 11-19-2011, 11:57 AM
  #65  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
I'll eat some crow... I thought the RENNtech #'s were a little optimistic...but then again...I think ALL tuners do that. I am glad that your car was able to back up those #'s!

Tom
Old 11-19-2011, 10:20 PM
  #66  
SGC
Senior Member
 
SGC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CL65
Originally Posted by TMC M5
I'll eat some crow... I thought the RENNtech #'s were a little optimistic...but then again...I think ALL tuners do that. I am glad that your car was able to back up those #'s!

Tom
Tom,

Its all good, I wasn't speaking about you.

Its healthy to be skeptical about some tuner's numbers. Fly by night tuners deserve it. Its another thing to claim (like Ricker's ignorant 100 octane hallucination) that a tuner is doing things that they aren't. Especially, when the person saying it doesn't know what they are talking about. I have seen at least 20 of the BiTurbo 63s on the dyno at Renntech after they have been tuned, and they all make in the vicinity of 560/620 at the wheels on 93 octane.

It is pretty amazing, and a giant leap forward over the last 63.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: '12 CLS 63 Baseline Dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.