CLS63 MHP S2 VS M5F10 PPP
#4
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
#5
Super Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
I'm not sure what that would prove?
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
Why dont you tell dima to race a PP-Performance CLS63
and lets see if he can do the same?
Lets see you run against this:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w218/4568...-rs-700-a.html
Car is now making 740hp on a dynomaha
Last edited by SLS Qatar; 07-11-2013 at 09:31 AM.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm not sure what that would prove?
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
THERE is NO MHP Hardware or software, all are from other tuners and resold for more money through middle man re seller MHP X-)
#7
Again you are correct, the videos are all edited on a green screen, no cars actually raced these are all ficticious scenarios posted by Russians with a sense of humor just for you.
Please tell me where else you can buy a MHP S2 CLS63 Biturbo package other than MHP, a dealer or distributor. How about any of their other hardware?
Please post links (proof) to back your claims. Good luck.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes
on
133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
Great videos and thanks for sharing.
What is the Pascal CLS63? Just stock PP? It seemed about even with M5.
What does the stage 2 MHP consists of? It did walk that M5 quite easily.
What does the PPP M5 package consists of?
What is the Pascal CLS63? Just stock PP? It seemed about even with M5.
What does the stage 2 MHP consists of? It did walk that M5 quite easily.
What does the PPP M5 package consists of?
#9
Super Member
The MHP S2 iirc is tune, full exhuast including downpipes, filters, 180 thermostat.
PPP M5 is just a tune.
Last edited by JumpinJim; 07-11-2013 at 11:34 AM.
#10
Super Member
Like for like. You're showing a tune only car vs a tuned car with more mods. Not a reasonable comparison.
Didn't look that way in the video.
They're overrating it. I think they're taking the assumed 600+ underating of the engine and adding theirs on top of it.
Plus headers and catless mids. An extensive mod list against a much heavier tune only car. Not proving much there.
I've seen them both ways. I'll know soon enough. I'll pit my stock M5 vs my stock non PP SL63. The SL63 already ate a tuned C63. The M5 feels stronger than the SL does.
The techtec tuned cls63 biturbo just had a tune and devoured the PPP M5.
The M5 is supposed to have 680HP with just PPPs tune and was driven in Manual mode.
In fact the S4 C63 (heads, cams, naturally aspirated with 670HP) in Moscow just walked on the same 680HP PPP tuned F10 M5. Vids coming to the C63 section soon. They are already on MHPs site.
No matter how many videos I see the new M5s are dogs with or without tuning. All around the world from the gulf to russia to the U.S.
#11
Pascal is the owner of Techtec in Germany. His car is a tune only CLS63 from a reputable tuner which is why I said there's no need for a M5 with exhaust video as there is already a tune vs tune M157 vs F10 M5 video here and now.
MHP S2 for E/CLS63 Biturbo is ECU Tune + Full 3" Exhaust from Turbos to Tips. A bolt-on package using stock turbos. I have the same on my 2012 E63.
Didn't look that way in the video.
They're overrating it. I think they're taking the assumed 600+ underating of the engine and adding theirs on top of it.
Plus headers and catless mids. An extensive mod list against a much heavier tune only car. Not proving much there.
I've seen them both ways. I'll know soon enough. I'll pit my stock M5 vs my stock non PP SL63. The SL63 already ate a tuned C63. The M5 feels stronger than the SL does.
Last edited by ShellURT; 07-11-2013 at 12:38 PM.
#12
Super Member
The newest series it wasn't close. The one before they were running even. The one before that the videos has a stock M5 beating a PPP tuned CLS63. So what conclusion can be drawn? Stock M5s are faster than tuned CLS63s or PPP isn't very good at tuning cars? The two cars are direct competitors, a comparison of one with additional mods vs tune only only shows that more mods are better than less mods. Do exhaust on both and then it would be interesting. I had a tuned CLS63 for almost 2 years and traded it a week and a half ago for the M5. I know exactly what they're capable of. The CLS/E has a weak IC setup. Here in TX they heat soak very quickly. The M5 has a better setup that allows them stock to keep up with AMGs tuned offering. So I switched. And the SL made the CLS redundant.
In the tuning biz the horses mouth is more often than not the source of most of the exageration. Take everything with a spoonfull of salt. Inflated HP figures, different correction factors, favorable run conditions, exagerated drivetrain loss calculations.
No doubt it's a good accomplishment, with that list of extensive mods it should be. With downpipes the outcome would have been different as it was a pretty slow walk. Nitrous and bigger turbos can be applied to the other cars as well, it's a never ending battle of who can mod the most.
Nah, should be pretty close. M5 feels stronger, but that might be the DCT. SL seems really underrated however. Haven't dynoed it yet as it just hit 1000 miles. The C63 and SL weights are about the same and on paper the OE tuned C and the SL have similar HP, but the SL ran away from it.
MF of TTR in Russia that did the M5 tuning via PPP said 680HP for the M5. Straight from the horses mouth.
Anything naturally aspirated eating the latest BMW M5 with TT and DI is an accomplishment my friend. Add FI or nitrous to the C63 to truly make itfair and it would be downright ugly.
Apples to Oranges but will be an interesting race to see nonetheless.
#14
The newest series it wasn't close. The one before they were running even. The one before that the videos has a stock M5 beating a PPP tuned CLS63. So what conclusion can be drawn? Stock M5s are faster than tuned CLS63s or PPP isn't very good at tuning cars? The two cars are direct competitors, a comparison of one with additional mods vs tune only only shows that more mods are better than less mods. Do exhaust on both and then it would be interesting. I had a tuned CLS63 for almost 2 years and traded it a week and a half ago for the M5. I know exactly what they're capable of. The CLS/E has a weak IC setup. Here in TX they heat soak very quickly. The M5 has a better setup that allows them stock to keep up with AMGs tuned offering. So I switched. And the SL made the CLS redundant.
Heat soak sucks with forced induction no doubt. We've been in the mid 90s with humidity in the high 90s for the past 18 days and it's killing me. Today was our first day of a cool front coming through and I cant tell you how much we needed it. No question weather effects how certain cars perform some more than others. Abdullah (Alrasheed63 I think is his screen name) in Saudi Arabia in temps over 100 degrees F beat a 2013 SL63 in his S2.5CMR C63 (N/A bolt-on, no heads, cams) a few days ago. When IATs skyrocket there's not much you can do. There have been many (jbizzy, abdullah, humberto ferrier and others that post in the 204 section) C63s with just headers/tuning that beat stock F10 M5s here in the U.S. in varying weather conditions. You can find their posts and videos if you search for them on this site.
In the tuning biz the horses mouth is more often than not the source of most of the exageration. Take everything with a spoonfull of salt. Inflated HP figures, different correction factors, favorable run conditions, exagerated drivetrain loss calculations.
No doubt it's a good accomplishment, with that list of extensive mods it should be. With downpipes the outcome would have been different as it was a pretty slow walk. Nitrous and bigger turbos can be applied to the other cars as well, it's a never ending battle of who can mod the most.
Nah, should be pretty close. M5 feels stronger, but that might be the DCT. SL seems really underrated however. Haven't dynoed it yet as it just hit 1000 miles. The C63 and SL weights are about the same and on paper the OE tuned C and the SL have similar HP, but the SL ran away from it.
I assume you mean CLS63 not C63? If so I think the SLs are around 150lbs lighter which isn't a huge difference. Makes me wonder if they have a sportier TCU cal than the CLS and Es. Would make sense based on the cost of the cars and MBs thinking relative to this.
Anyway my money says a your SL properly tuned will walk your M5 properly tuned, and the same if you put exhausts on both Just MHO take it fwiw.
Last edited by ShellURT; 07-11-2013 at 04:13 PM.
#15
I do like the look of the F10 M5 but am blown away by the M6 Sedan!!! If it had a 5.5L NA or TT V10 I'd own one.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
The newest series it wasn't close. The one before they were running even. The one before that the videos has a stock M5 beating a PPP tuned CLS63. So what conclusion can be drawn? Stock M5s are faster than tuned CLS63s or PPP isn't very good at tuning cars? The two cars are direct competitors, a comparison of one with additional mods vs tune only only shows that more mods are better than less mods. Do exhaust on both and then it would be interesting. I had a tuned CLS63 for almost 2 years and traded it a week and a half ago for the M5. I know exactly what they're capable of. The CLS/E has a weak IC setup. Here in TX they heat soak very quickly. The M5 has a better setup that allows them stock to keep up with AMGs tuned offering. So I switched. And the SL made the CLS redundant.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
could of been the fans? well in that case both were tested in the same dyno and conditions. Maybe it needs air from the highway at certain speeds?
.. I have yet to see the IC core of the AMG show a weakness.. I don't think this forum has actively measured the IAT's and timing as they have done on the E55 forums.
Maybe the system is not as robust as the M's.. but not sure if that is translating into actual weakenss, at least there is no clear evidence yet.
Would be nice to data log both cars for boost, IAT's and engine timing and also how quickly they recover after WOT runs.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Like death and taxes here in the U.S. hate from zod is inescapable from half a world away.
Again you are correct, the videos are all edited on a green screen, no cars actually raced these are all ficticious scenarios posted by Russians with a sense of humor just for you.
Please tell me where else you can buy a MHP S2 CLS63 Biturbo package other than MHP, a dealer or distributor. How about any of their other hardware?
Please post links (proof) to back your claims. Good luck.
Again you are correct, the videos are all edited on a green screen, no cars actually raced these are all ficticious scenarios posted by Russians with a sense of humor just for you.
Please tell me where else you can buy a MHP S2 CLS63 Biturbo package other than MHP, a dealer or distributor. How about any of their other hardware?
Please post links (proof) to back your claims. Good luck.
Where is MHP?
Tell me a forum in which they are not banned ?
so much drama its hard to hide
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...aling-him.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-question.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...thank-you.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...nal-proof.html
Search this on Google
The final nail in the MHP (Modern Horsepower / Andrew Cluck) "tuner" coffin? MHP business done? MHP M156 63 AMG "records" actually belong to another tuner
There is so much its never ending...and oh did i mention you are banned from pretty much all decent forums?
Stop cheating people, the amount you have accumulated over here is disgusting!
Last edited by Zod; 07-11-2013 at 07:16 PM.
#18
Dear god...proof he says
Where is MHP?
Tell me a forum in which they are not banned ?
so much drama its hard to hide
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...aling-him.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-question.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...thank-you.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...nal-proof.html
Search this on Google
The final nail in the MHP (Modern Horsepower / Andrew Cluck) "tuner" coffin? MHP business done? MHP M156 63 AMG "records" actually belong to another tuner
There is so much its never ending...and oh did i mention you are banned from pretty much all decent forums?
Stop cheating people, the amount you have accumulated over here is disgusting!
Where is MHP?
Tell me a forum in which they are not banned ?
so much drama its hard to hide
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...aling-him.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-question.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...thank-you.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...nal-proof.html
Search this on Google
The final nail in the MHP (Modern Horsepower / Andrew Cluck) "tuner" coffin? MHP business done? MHP M156 63 AMG "records" actually belong to another tuner
There is so much its never ending...and oh did i mention you are banned from pretty much all decent forums?
Stop cheating people, the amount you have accumulated over here is disgusting!
Other threads have been created by Phil Caggiano MHPs former software partner. Both Phil and his father Phil Caggianio Sr. are felons which anyone can google, in fact I posted proof in the linked thread of this. Phil was responsible for all glued and epoxied ECUs that MHP never approved of.
AutoTech doesnt even have a website and is riding MHPs coattails as the car they are toying with has all MHP mods on it. Too bad they cant get the cams to work because they burned their bridge with MHP.
I can go on and on but again you live on the other side of the world and just repost heresay and biased text because thats all you can do: Hate.
Youve never done anything yourself but have no problem talking crap about businesses that continuously put out quality product. I find it almost funny that with all the blown motor threads on this site and others you try to pull this tabloid crap out like it means something.
Post an invoice a receipt, something of merritt real proof please. Dont just link threads and repost heresay.
Ok Im off my horse and going back to the green screen to film more fake footage of PPPs cars getting stomped by everyone.
Oh did I mention the only forum Andy is banned from is this forum which has everything to do with this sites former administrators who are no longer here. Even Joseph Wilk has posted Andy can post on his forums however due to Josephs control (being able to wipe out a post due to his rep power) and the additional hits Andy posting on his site would cause he refuses. Love heresay, got anything else?
Last edited by ShellURT; 07-11-2013 at 08:13 PM.
#19
Point taken that the 5.5TT does not have dual IC heat exchangers/cores like the 4.4TT M motor.. but it does not suffer from heat soak any more than the M5. I'm sure you seen the CLS63 vs M5 Edmunds dyno review.. where the M5 had a 50RWHP disperity between 10+ dyno runs.. and the CLS had none.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
could of been the fans? well in that case both were tested in the same dyno and conditions. Maybe it needs air from the highway at certain speeds?
.. I have yet to see the IC core of the AMG show a weakness.. I don't think this forum has actively measured the IAT's and timing as they have done on the E55 forums.
Maybe the system is not as robust as the M's.. but not sure if that is translating into actual weakenss, at least there is no clear evidence yet.
Would be nice to data log both cars for boost, IAT's and engine timing and also how quickly they recover after WOT runs.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
could of been the fans? well in that case both were tested in the same dyno and conditions. Maybe it needs air from the highway at certain speeds?
.. I have yet to see the IC core of the AMG show a weakness.. I don't think this forum has actively measured the IAT's and timing as they have done on the E55 forums.
Maybe the system is not as robust as the M's.. but not sure if that is translating into actual weakenss, at least there is no clear evidence yet.
Would be nice to data log both cars for boost, IAT's and engine timing and also how quickly they recover after WOT runs.
Compared to my E55 and CL65 this is a night and day difference, both would heat up and then never cool down unless I popped the hood and cracked 12 beers waiting. My E55 would lose 30rwhp between pulls on the dyno. Not so with the M157s.
I have also heard that later build M157s as in later 2012+ which is evidently not mine have a separate engine and intercooler cooling systems. If I have version 1 I bet version 2 is pretty damn good.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
9 Posts
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
Good post. No matter how hot or humid it is outside my engine coolant temps never rise over 215 degrees F. Right now in summer with 90+F temps and high humidity I can do 3-5 highway pulls and get my oil temps (stock Mobil 1 oil) to 235 degrees F but they cool down to 210-212F within 2-3 minutes of cruising in 7th gear at 70mph. The longer I cruise the closer to 200 degrees F they go.
Compared to my E55 and CL65 this is a night and day difference, both would heat up and then never cool down unless I popped the hood and cracked 12 beers waiting. My E55 would lose 30rwhp between pulls on the dyno. Not so with the M157s.
I have also heard that later build M157s as in later 2012+ which is evidently not mine have a separate engine and intercooler cooling systems. If I have version 1 I bet version 2 is pretty damn good.
Compared to my E55 and CL65 this is a night and day difference, both would heat up and then never cool down unless I popped the hood and cracked 12 beers waiting. My E55 would lose 30rwhp between pulls on the dyno. Not so with the M157s.
I have also heard that later build M157s as in later 2012+ which is evidently not mine have a separate engine and intercooler cooling systems. If I have version 1 I bet version 2 is pretty damn good.
oil temps at idle
stock : 100C - 105C
tuned: 84C - 88C
at crusing
stock : 110C
tuned : 84C and drops sometime to 78C (blue color )
at WOT:
stock : 125C
tuned : 115C
I have been testing and seeing my IATs, timings, etc
outside temp 30C
tuned with no intercoolers from 100km - 250km my IATs jump from 40C - 85C and my boost is 22PSI, catless exhuast (that IATs affect performance a lot ) cooling back takes 1 min crusing
timing is beeing pulled due to heat.
I installed split cooling system with addtional H/Es.
did not have the time to test it.
i remember that my car used to suffer alot because of high IATs.
sometimes if i race 5 - 6 times back to back, it goes to limp mode and drives like a 55k without S/C engaging
hopefully not anymore
now my IATs are cooler, will update more after testing it.
PS: see my sig pic for our temps in summer.
#21
oil temps at idle
stock : 100C - 105C
tuned: 84C - 88C
at crusing
stock : 110C
tuned : 84C and drops sometime to 78C (blue color )
at WOT:
stock : 125C
tuned : 115C
I have been testing and seeing my IATs, timings, etc
outside temp 30C
tuned with no intercoolers from 100km - 250km my IATs jump from 40C - 85C and my boost is 22PSI, catless exhuast (that IATs affect performance a lot ) cooling back takes 1 min crusing
timing is beeing pulled due to heat.
I installed split cooling system with addtional H/Es.
did not have the time to test it.
i remember that my car used to suffer alot because of high IATs.
sometimes if i race 5 - 6 times back to back, it goes to limp mode and drives like a 55k without S/C engaging
hopefully not anymore
now my IATs are cooler, will update more after testing it.
PS: see my sig pic for our temps in summer.
stock : 100C - 105C
tuned: 84C - 88C
at crusing
stock : 110C
tuned : 84C and drops sometime to 78C (blue color )
at WOT:
stock : 125C
tuned : 115C
I have been testing and seeing my IATs, timings, etc
outside temp 30C
tuned with no intercoolers from 100km - 250km my IATs jump from 40C - 85C and my boost is 22PSI, catless exhuast (that IATs affect performance a lot ) cooling back takes 1 min crusing
timing is beeing pulled due to heat.
I installed split cooling system with addtional H/Es.
did not have the time to test it.
i remember that my car used to suffer alot because of high IATs.
sometimes if i race 5 - 6 times back to back, it goes to limp mode and drives like a 55k without S/C engaging
hopefully not anymore
now my IATs are cooler, will update more after testing it.
PS: see my sig pic for our temps in summer.
Thank You!
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Point taken that the 5.5TT does not have dual IC heat exchangers/cores like the 4.4TT M motor.. but it does not suffer from heat soak any more than the M5. I'm sure you seen the CLS63 vs M5 Edmunds dyno review.. where the M5 had a 50RWHP disperity between 10+ dyno runs.. and the CLS had none.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
could of been the fans? well in that case both were tested in the same dyno and conditions. Maybe it needs air from the highway at certain speeds?
.. I have yet to see the IC core of the AMG show a weakness.. I don't think this forum has actively measured the IAT's and timing as they have done on the E55 forums.
Maybe the system is not as robust as the M's.. but not sure if that is translating into actual weakenss, at least there is no clear evidence yet.
Would be nice to data log both cars for boost, IAT's and engine timing and also how quickly they recover after WOT runs.
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...no-tested.html
could of been the fans? well in that case both were tested in the same dyno and conditions. Maybe it needs air from the highway at certain speeds?
.. I have yet to see the IC core of the AMG show a weakness.. I don't think this forum has actively measured the IAT's and timing as they have done on the E55 forums.
Maybe the system is not as robust as the M's.. but not sure if that is translating into actual weakenss, at least there is no clear evidence yet.
Would be nice to data log both cars for boost, IAT's and engine timing and also how quickly they recover after WOT runs.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
The M5's dual DMEs (ECUs) have been very difficult for tuners to crack (supposedly the only "true" tune is a development tune from BMW M division that somehow made its way out to some tuners and has been used as the basis for each tuner's "custom" tune). Anyway.... supposedly the DME is so sensitive that it will start doing crazy things on the dyno since it is sensing that the air speed and front wheels are not matching the rear wheel speed. So the loss in power may not be due toany sort of heat soak...but the DME pulling timing and boost because of conflicts in its various sensors.
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Supposedly BMW has a mini-book on the "proper" procedures for dynoing the F10 M5. I haven't seen it but I am going to try to get my hands on it since I would like to get a proper baseline.