MBWorld.org Forums

C219 CLS55 and CLS63, 2004-2010

Official specs of 6,3 AMG engine released

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-07-2005, 03:50 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Frank Wiesmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Official specs of 6,3 AMG engine released
Link
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/113388-official-information-6-3-liter-amg-engine-released.html
Frank Wiesmann is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 07:56 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/

according to this site the new 6.3 engine has more torque. Am I reading this right? It says 610 !
Stiggs is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 08:52 AM
  #3  
Member
 
amgplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Augustine, FL
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Diavel
that's metric!
amgplayer is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 12:50 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jikjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLS55 AMG & RRS S/C
630 NM is about 465 foot pounds of torque
jikjak is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 01:11 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
clkcadet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S550
that should be enough either way!
clkcadet is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 02:05 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Oh....so the new engine has more horsepower than torque? Doesn't that suck?

Stiggs is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-12-2005, 05:57 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jikjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLS55 AMG & RRS S/C
ya that does kinda suck.

and it definately isnt enough torque
jikjak is offline  
Reply Like

Trending Topics

Old 07-13-2005, 08:21 AM
  #8  
Member
 
amgplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Augustine, FL
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Diavel
But at least it's not 390 like the Bavarian one.
amgplayer is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-13-2005, 09:51 PM
  #9  
RJC
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RJC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: 2000 ft over the Fl coast in a B-17
Posts: 5,824
Received 260 Likes on 186 Posts
Thumbs up
460lbft +/- is a very nice number especially without turbos or a supercharger. I prefer NA engines, especially those with enough displacement to get this kind of trq.
RJC is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-14-2005, 07:37 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
so will this engine be faster than the current 5.5L Kompressor?
Will it be better down the road in terms of mechanical problems?
Stiggs is offline  
Reply Like
Old 07-14-2005, 08:48 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jon200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MB - World
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stiggs
http://www.mercedes-amg.com/

according to this site the new 6.3 engine has more torque. Am I reading this right? It says 610 !
The 5.5L K has 700Nm I think
Jon200 is offline  
Reply Like
Tags
Back to Subforum
C219
View Next Unread
What's your background on your computer...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes, average.
Show Printable Version
Email this Page

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Official specs of 6,3 AMG engine released


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.