Pre-Mod Dyno Results
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 12
Well, you're deriving the hp backwords in our case though.
Since we already have the rear wheel horsepower AFTER the drivetrain, when we convert back to engine hp, we get lower figures (considering we have a lower driveline loss) because we've lost a lot less hp.
Since we already have the rear wheel horsepower AFTER the drivetrain, when we convert back to engine hp, we get lower figures (considering we have a lower driveline loss) because we've lost a lot less hp.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,894
Likes: 8
From: Connecticut
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by ricky.agrawal
Well, you're deriving the hp backwords in our case though.
Since we already have the rear wheel horsepower AFTER the drivetrain, when we convert back to engine hp, we get lower figures (considering we have a lower driveline loss) because we've lost a lot less hp.
Since we already have the rear wheel horsepower AFTER the drivetrain, when we convert back to engine hp, we get lower figures (considering we have a lower driveline loss) because we've lost a lot less hp.
Of course it took me 8 years!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,431
Likes: 10
From: St George Utah
2017 SL63
After reading all the replys to this thread... I have decided one thing for sure, that I have the same car, am going to do the same mod and can't wait to see the "after" dyno charts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
