Washer Method
RiCh
Last edited by Bipasha493; Jun 1, 2006 at 06:19 PM.


now if i refered to everyone as "ok gentlemen" would you have asked me the same question? Theres "ladies" on this forum to ya know.
I spoke to a couple of people about how it could be lowered and they all admitted that the way it was done is way too expensive but, it was done the right way! which did not effect the ride quality as much.
A lowering module is not cheap. I will not say price becuase I may get it from a member of the board, but from what i understand is the right way to do it...Again there is a huge debate and untill I have more response from people that have done it throught the washer method that can convince me to go this route I will purchase a module.
I would be very interested to see what you finally decided and if you think you got out of it what you expected.
Sorry for the long thread!
Cloa
Its a very hard debate. The modules are expensive, but the washer method is too good to be true. There are some members on board who have gone the washer method and came out with fantastic results with our cars. As of now:
90%-washer method
10%-module
p.s. the 10 percent i can tell you...is holding on reallllllll tightttt bro
-RiCh
Last edited by Bipasha493; Jun 1, 2006 at 09:21 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Lowering module benefits.
Well tested by major tuners such as Brabus, Kleeman, and others.
I've heard of no major issues with these modules.
Adjustable height, from low to very low.
Downside of module
Cost
splicing into factory wires
Now if for some reason the module malfunctioned and screwed up some factory harness or wiring or suspension, and lets say the dealer finds out that this was installed, depending on your relationship with your dealer they could say SORRY, you have to pay to play.
Washer or drop links benefits
Simple installation buy anyone with a jack and a dremel
Cost
Easily removable
Undetected by dealer if something were to go wrong and you removed them.
More of a range of drop.
Downside to washers.
I can't seem to find any other then guys that have spent nearly $2k on a lowering module, then bash the washer method cause they didn't use washers
I will probably do a combo of the Star Diagnosis if my dealer knows how, and the washers when mine comes in
I did actually got turned down by a local dealer for repairs on my E500. I brought the car in for some clunking noise underneath the car, but the dealer refuse to repair or diagnose the problem, since there were aftermarket parts on the car. They blamed it on the lorinser body kit and exhaust.
I'd end up taking the car to a friends shop to lift up and discovered one of the cover underneath the car was loose. A two minute fix....
in short, save yourself the trouble and try to keep it as stock as possible.
well so far so good with the washer method. everthings perfectly fine and best of all u cant beat the price!
well so far so good with the washer method. everthings perfectly fine and best of all u cant beat the price!
Crown Bolt Inc., Flat Washer 6mm, stainless steel, UPC# 3069901238 (3 pc)
Crown Bolt Inc., Lock Nut Tension 6mm, UPC# 3069957348 (1 pc)
[find these in the the drawers holding metric nuts, washers, etc]
Tungsten Carbide Cutter #9901

The washers fit perfectly and were reasonably consistent in thickness. I bought four packs and rejected a few that were a bit thicker than the others. I placed four per side which created a spacer of about 5.3mm. The factory nut, which has a flanged base, would barely tighten and I was afraid of stripping the bolt. It probably would have been okay with some Loctite applied. But since I don't want to take any chances I replaced it with the tension nut, which lacks the flanged bottom and hence is thinner. It tightens very well, with the bolt just extending through the top of the nut, and it will not come loose. I still may apply Loctite for added safety.
The tungsten carbide cutter costs more than the high speed cutters, but one bit did the job and it is still ready for battle. The support frame holding the rear sensor bracket is not aluminum (as someone mistakenly told me) but rather hardened steel, and I would think several high speed cutters would be needed to finish the job. I slotted the rear bracket holes about 6mm towards the ground / away from the engine as in the picture below. Using the tungsten carbide bit it took about 10 minutes per side with a cordless Dremel on a partial charge; less time would have been necessary if I had a corded unit, more if I were using the high speed cutters.

End result after raising/lowering a few times with the console button and driving around for a few days was 25-7/8" between ground and the top of each wheel well. I use the Airmatic Sport 1 setting almost exclusively. The stock height was 26-5/8" up front and 26-3/4" in the back, so the achieved drop was about 3/4" up front and 7/8" in the rear. This did eliminate the tire gap, and car looks great with no detectable compromise of ride quality. Also I would expect camber to remain in spec because of the modest drop, although I haven't yet had an alignment to confirm this.
Total cost including the cutting bit was about $13
Last edited by Heisenberg; Jun 5, 2006 at 02:23 AM.
Pics and measurements were indeed taken with the car turned off and parked.
Best way to lower.
Thanks
I would think that with car vibration it will eventually move back, i could be wrong just a concern.
Clos






