C219 CLS55 and CLS63, 2004-2010

CLS 550 as fast as 63?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-28-2007, 01:38 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TREZ63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 RRS ; BMW K1200R; 14 E350 ; 14 RRS on order
Originally Posted by Ted Baldwin
...........happy for you. Most 63's DO NOT start in 1st gear.

AMG_55, 0-60 times are gradually becomming obsolete. This is because as the HP wars result in creation of cars with HP in the stratosphere, traction from a dig dictates 0-60 times. For instance, the published 0-60 time for the SL65 is 4.2 secs. Of course the SL65 is not slower than the E63. Races run over a longer distance such as 1/4 mile are more useful. Sometimes to compensate for this, cars are run fr0m 5-60 instead of 0-60.

Ted

All 63s start in 1st gear. I have driven around 10 of them (AMG Challenge). There is a transmission update that fixes the 2nd gear start.
Old 06-28-2007, 01:48 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TREZ63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 RRS ; BMW K1200R; 14 E350 ; 14 RRS on order
Okay, I just watched that video. It was a raving review with the exception of the part you pointed out. The guy didn't sound like he knew what he was talking about. "Faster and Quicker" what the heck does that mean? How are those different? Anyway, I test drove both, and the 550 IS fast, but the 63 is ridiculously fast, when you punch it, it moves like a raped ape. The 550 struggles while the 63 does it with ease.
Old 06-28-2007, 03:23 AM
  #28  
Out Of Control!!
 
JRAMGV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 10,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
1999 C280 Previous / 2008 E350
Originally Posted by TREZ63
Okay, I just watched that video. It was a raving review with the exception of the part you pointed out. The guy didn't sound like he knew what he was talking about. "Faster and Quicker" what the heck does that mean? How are those different? Anyway, I test drove both, and the 550 IS fast, but the 63 is ridiculously fast, when you punch it, it moves like a raped ape. The 550 struggles while the 63 does it with ease.
Yeah 550 are fast... fast enough to pass my brother's GT Mustang at highway speeds.
Old 06-28-2007, 06:03 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by kip
I think the gearing prefers the 0-60 times because in the 0-100km/h or other tests here in Europe there is no comparison.

E63 is much quicker and so is the E55.

By the way here the E500 is the same as the E550 there.

Mercedes-Benz E 500 Elegance - 2006 (Serie)


Motorart V 8
Hubraum 5461 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro 4
PS - UMin 388 PS (285 kW) - 6000/Min
Nm - UMin 530 Nm - 2800/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/Automatik
Test in ams 12/2006
Gewicht 1835 kg
0 - 80 km/h 4,0 s
0 - 100 km/h 5,4 s
0 - 120 km/h 7,4 s
0 - 130 km/h 8,4 s
0 - 140 km/h 9,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 12,3 s
0 - 180 km/h 15,6 s
0 - 200 km/h 19,4 s
0 - 250 km/h - s
400 m, stehender Start - s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 38 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 38 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs - min
Motopark Oschersleben - min
Querbeschleunigung - g
Slalom 18 m 60,9 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 131,1 km/h
Testverbrauch min/max/ges 8,2/16,3/13,9 L/SB
Grundpreis 62.582 Euro (05/2006)
Testwagenpreis - Euro

Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG W211 Limousine - 2006 (Serie)


Motorart V 8
Hubraum 6208 ccm
Aufladung Sauger/Euro 4
PS - UMin 514 PS (378 kW) - 6800/Min
Nm - UMin 630 Nm - 5200/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 7/Automatik
Test in ams 16/2006
Gewicht 1935 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,7 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,9 s
0 - 120 km/h 6,6 s
0 - 130 km/h 7,5 s
0 - 140 km/h 8,5 s
0 - 160 km/h 10,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 13,5 s
0 - 200 km/h 16,5 s
0 - 250 km/h - s
400 m, stehender Start - s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 39 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 38 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs - min
Motopark Oschersleben - min
Querbeschleunigung - g
Slalom 18 m 62,2 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest 110 m 138,0 km/h
Testverbrauch min/max/ges 11,0/22,3/16,5 L/SP
Grundpreis 95.468 Euro (07/2006)
Testwagenpreis - Euro


Mercedes E55 AMG - 2003 (Serie)


Motorart V 8
Hubraum 5439 ccm
Aufladung Kompressor
PS - UMin 476 PS - 6100/Min
Nm - UMin 700 Nm - 2650/Min
Motorlage/Antrieb Frontmotor/Heck
Gänge/Schaltung 5/Automatik
Test in sport auto 01/2003
Gewicht 1944 kg
0 - 80 km/h 3,3 s
0 - 100 km/h 4,6 s
0 - 120 km/h 5,9 s
0 - 130 km/h - s
0 - 140 km/h 7,6 s
0 - 160 km/h 9,8 s
0 - 180 km/h 12,2 s
0 - 200 km/h 14,6 s
1 km, stehender Start - s
Vmax 250 km/h
100 - 0 km/h (kalt) 38,0 m
100 - 0 km/h (warm) 38,3 m
Nordschleife - min
Hockenheim, kleiner Kurs 1.18,0 min
Querbeschleunigung 1,05 g
Slalom 18 m 61,5 km/h
Slalom 36 m - km/h
ISO Ausweichtest - km/h
Testverbrauch 20,5 L/SB
Testwagenpreis 99.476 Euro


The car and driver test suggests otherwise see below


To a certain extent, that’s what our numbers show. The CLS63 gets to 60 mph from rest in a blistering 4.1 seconds, a tenth quicker than the CLS55, but is identical otherwise up to 120 mph and shares a 12.6-second quarter-mile time. The 30-to-50 and 50-to-70-mph figures show the benefits of the supercharged motor’s fatter torque curve (2.2 and 2.5 seconds, respectively, compared with 2.5 and 3.1 for the CLS63), while the extra top-end grunt of the 63 comes into play above 120 mph. By 150 mph, the CLS63 is ahead by almost a second and a half.


63 engine destroys the 55 above 120 making up for falling behind 30-70..This seems very accurate from my personal experience racing the 55. You may get pulled mid track but usually you can hold the 55 off after 90 mph . But if you fail to get the jump on the 55 you lose everytime , 63 will not pull a healthy 55 but it most certainly will reel in a 550. Edmunds made a mistake thats all. The cars performance wise (63 vs 550) is truly understated in this video. The 550 is great and a good choice for a powerful, capable sedan but no way is it keeping pace with either AMG55 or AMG63
Old 07-03-2007, 02:15 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
StealthAuto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Los Angeles
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cobra/E55
Edmonds is crazy! I've seen a few mistakes they've made in the past.
Old 07-04-2007, 04:36 AM
  #31  
kip
Super Member
 
kip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by juicee63
The car and driver test suggests otherwise see below


To a certain extent, that’s what our numbers show. The CLS63 gets to 60 mph from rest in a blistering 4.1 seconds, a tenth quicker than the CLS55, but is identical otherwise up to 120 mph and shares a 12.6-second quarter-mile time. The 30-to-50 and 50-to-70-mph figures show the benefits of the supercharged motor’s fatter torque curve (2.2 and 2.5 seconds, respectively, compared with 2.5 and 3.1 for the CLS63), while the extra top-end grunt of the 63 comes into play above 120 mph. By 150 mph, the CLS63 is ahead by almost a second and a half.


63 engine destroys the 55 above 120 making up for falling behind 30-70..This seems very accurate from my personal experience racing the 55. You may get pulled mid track but usually you can hold the 55 off after 90 mph . But if you fail to get the jump on the 55 you lose everytime , 63 will not pull a healthy 55 but it most certainly will reel in a 550. Edmunds made a mistake thats all. The cars performance wise (63 vs 550) is truly understated in this video. The 550 is great and a good choice for a powerful, capable sedan but no way is it keeping pace with either AMG55 or AMG63
I dont understand what you mean by car and driver getting different results. 550 is always a lot slower??!! The results are exavtly the same!

E550:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...benz-e550.html

It’s hard for us to dislike a car that can hurl itself to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and cover a quarter-mile in 13.4 at 106 mph. Not so long ago those numbers would have rivaled a Corvette’s, and they’re better than the sprints posted by the first-generation E55 AMG, not to mention the best in this test. The updated E-class Benz achieves this the old-fashioned way: It has more muscle and a torque curve whose topography is similar to Nebraska’s — long and flat.



E63:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...z-e63-amg.html

Paired with the Mercedes seven-speed automatic, the AMG V-8 delivers 4.2-second 0-to-60-mph runs and covers the quarter-mile in 12.6 seconds at 115 mph — about the same as the E55 AMG, even though the E63 weighs in some 80 pounds heavier. The seven-speed automatic has a paddle-shifted manumatic function that really knows how to follow orders, no independent decisions, unlike the Audi’s six-speed auto. As an aside, we have a confession to make: As much as we like the sense of involvement that goes with a good manual gearbox, we have to admit that the latest manumatic and automated manual transmissions are pretty compelling, particularly allied with big-output powerplants such as the ones under scrutiny here

E55:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...ets-page3.html

Propelled by the same supercharged 5.4-liter SOHC 24-valve V-8 employed in the SL55 AMG, albeit with a little less horsepower, it’s even faster than the SL55 we tested last November, clocking 0 to 60 in 4.3 seconds, 0 to 100 in 9.9, 0 to 150 in 24.5, and the quarter in 12.5 seconds at 116 mph. That’s quicker than anything else in this roundup—quicker, in fact, than any production sedan we’ve ever tested. Sports-car quick. The last Corvette Z06 we tested (December 2001) hit 60 mph in 4.0 seconds, 100 in 9.2, and 150 in 24.1, and it covered the quarter in 12.4 seconds at 116 mph.
Old 07-04-2007, 08:13 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
300ce
Originally Posted by TREZ63
All 63s start in 1st gear. I have driven around 10 of them (AMG Challenge). There is a transmission update that fixes the 2nd gear start.
.......I am sure you enjoyed yourself at the AMG challenge. But the point is that obviously not all 63's start in first gear. If they did there will be no need for the update. Right? Perhaps Edmund's tested one of the many 63's that start in second gear. The ones like on this thread where the dealers are still clueless how to do the update.


https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...=63+gear+start

Ted
Old 07-04-2007, 12:43 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
juicee63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hollywood CA
Posts: 6,950
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2007 CLS63 030
Originally Posted by kip
I dont understand what you mean by car and driver getting different results. 550 is always a lot slower??!! The results are exavtly the same!

E550:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...benz-e550.html

It’s hard for us to dislike a car that can hurl itself to 60 mph in 4.8 seconds and cover a quarter-mile in 13.4 at 106 mph. Not so long ago those numbers would have rivaled a Corvette’s, and they’re better than the sprints posted by the first-generation E55 AMG, not to mention the best in this test. The updated E-class Benz achieves this the old-fashioned way: It has more muscle and a torque curve whose topography is similar to Nebraska’s — long and flat.



E63:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...z-e63-amg.html

Paired with the Mercedes seven-speed automatic, the AMG V-8 delivers 4.2-second 0-to-60-mph runs and covers the quarter-mile in 12.6 seconds at 115 mph — about the same as the E55 AMG, even though the E63 weighs in some 80 pounds heavier. The seven-speed automatic has a paddle-shifted manumatic function that really knows how to follow orders, no independent decisions, unlike the Audi’s six-speed auto. As an aside, we have a confession to make: As much as we like the sense of involvement that goes with a good manual gearbox, we have to admit that the latest manumatic and automated manual transmissions are pretty compelling, particularly allied with big-output powerplants such as the ones under scrutiny here

E55:

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...ets-page3.html

Propelled by the same supercharged 5.4-liter SOHC 24-valve V-8 employed in the SL55 AMG, albeit with a little less horsepower, it’s even faster than the SL55 we tested last November, clocking 0 to 60 in 4.3 seconds, 0 to 100 in 9.9, 0 to 150 in 24.5, and the quarter in 12.5 seconds at 116 mph. That’s quicker than anything else in this roundup—quicker, in fact, than any production sedan we’ve ever tested. Sports-car quick. The last Corvette Z06 we tested (December 2001) hit 60 mph in 4.0 seconds, 100 in 9.2, and 150 in 24.1, and it covered the quarter in 12.4 seconds at 116 mph.

Sorry Kip!

I have lost my mind defending the 63

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLS 550 as fast as 63?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.