Just traded C32 for M3....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
02 C32
Just traded C32 for M3....
All is I can say is what a difference!!!
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value
!
Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value
!Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
03 C32 AMG Blk/Blk
How much for the rims? Btw congrats. I thought about M3 when I got my C32 a while back seeing as I had a supercharged 325ci before the C32 but decided for the C32 (wanted 4 doors). But nice choice. 
Time to change your "I Drive a: " field in your profile now too.
-Mike
Time to change your "I Drive a: " field in your profile now too.-Mike
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 1
From: Nashville
300SEL
Originally Posted by IS1
All is I can say is what a difference!!!
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value !
Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value
!Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 2
From: San Diego
2002 C32 Black/Charcoal
Originally Posted by IS1
All is I can say is what a difference!!!
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value !
Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value
!Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
My neighbor's 6speed TL feels as quick as my C32, but I smoke him. This is the nature of a manual tranny. The convertible M3 weighs something like 500 lbs more than the hardtop version. Unless your C32 was running on 4 cylinders, it (the C32) was faster.
It sounds like you bought a convertible M3? Tighter than the C32? I test drove a convert M3 with 30K miles when I was shopping for my C32. I loved the fact that it was a convertible and ran great. However, structural rigidity was above my teenage-years 88 Mustang GT Convert but certainly below the C32. Are you comparing similar-mileage cars?
Handling: The M3 coupe definitely outhandles a stock C32. I would be surprised if the same thing could be said for the convertible.
Looks: I definitely agree that the M3 is the best choice for the "younger crowd." It looks much more sporty than the C32. I especially like it in that dark blue color. I guess the question is whether or not you want to "stay below the radar." I like the fact that nobody sees me coming in my C32 but, if I were 15 years younger and single, I would choose the M3.
Resale value: All cars of this genre tank, especially when a newer model comes out. You might want to brace your pocketbook for (another) hit when the new M3 hits the streets next year.
Congrats on your purchase!
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
03 C32 AMG Blk/Blk
Originally Posted by schwarzwagen
i would have waited for the e90 m3. did you get a deal as a result?
Hell, if the new M3 looks anything like the new 5/7, etc. I'd take the old (current M3) over the new one and just supercharge it.
-Mike
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
03 C32 AMG Blk/Blk
Originally Posted by Vomit
"Hell, if the new M3 looks anything like the new 5/7, etc. I'd take the old (current M3) over the new one and just supercharge it."
Ka-Boom.
Ka-Boom.
-Mike
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Bowie, MD
03 C32 AMG Blk/Blk
Originally Posted by AaronC
Interesting. As a previous BMW owner(330Ci), my first choice was the M3. However after I drove the C32, and researched its modding potential I felt it was the better choice.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by M&M
Better watch what you say or Improviz will get you banned!
Congrats BTW.
Congrats BTW.
Rgds,
Norm
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by IS1
All is I can say is what a difference!!!
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value !
Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Definitly feels faster (maybe since it's a 6sp)
Much tighter of a car
Looks, Looks, Looks, and that is with the top up!
Stock stereo, even worse than the C32
Outhandles the C32 (even before the springs, and 19's)
Besides a larger backseat I can't think of one thing my C32 had over the M3, except crappy resale and trade in value
!Good luck guys and my SSR GT3's are still available!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Almost a Member!
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
2005 Brilliant Silver C55
I had a 2004 E46M3 and currently drive a 2005 C55. With respect to your comments...
1) Seat of the pants it probably does feel faster but I seriously doubt it
2) My 2005 C55 is much tighter than my 2004 M3. I had reoccuring rattles and vibrations at various rpm levels with my M3
3) I assume you have a convertible so the added weight will negatively affect performance over the coupe add 19's and reduce it even further if you are not careful.
4) I disagree with the looks comment. I think both cars have great lines. The C55 is more subtle the M3 is more aggressive.
5) The OEM stereo in the M3 just sucks! And I had the upgraded HK unit.
6) Yes, it does outhandle the C but 99% of C buyers don't track the car so what difference does that make?
7) As to resale, I believe that the residuals are within a few percentage points for either car. In fact, I know BMW is offering large discounts on 325 and 330 models to clear inventory before the E90 hits the streets in a few. Thus, I would suspect that your car will also experience crappy resale value and trade in value.
The current E46M3 has one more run year (2006 model) and then no M for 2007 and the new M in 2008 if BMW follows its history. My E46 M3 had a sticker price of about $55k and I drove it for 9 months and it had 4200 miles and I sold it for $46k!!!! Talk about crappy resale value!!
1) Seat of the pants it probably does feel faster but I seriously doubt it
2) My 2005 C55 is much tighter than my 2004 M3. I had reoccuring rattles and vibrations at various rpm levels with my M3
3) I assume you have a convertible so the added weight will negatively affect performance over the coupe add 19's and reduce it even further if you are not careful.
4) I disagree with the looks comment. I think both cars have great lines. The C55 is more subtle the M3 is more aggressive.
5) The OEM stereo in the M3 just sucks! And I had the upgraded HK unit.
6) Yes, it does outhandle the C but 99% of C buyers don't track the car so what difference does that make?
7) As to resale, I believe that the residuals are within a few percentage points for either car. In fact, I know BMW is offering large discounts on 325 and 330 models to clear inventory before the E90 hits the streets in a few. Thus, I would suspect that your car will also experience crappy resale value and trade in value.
The current E46M3 has one more run year (2006 model) and then no M for 2007 and the new M in 2008 if BMW follows its history. My E46 M3 had a sticker price of about $55k and I drove it for 9 months and it had 4200 miles and I sold it for $46k!!!! Talk about crappy resale value!!
