How screwed am I
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by respdoc
lol..
This thread would be more interesting if this guy filled up with diesel... :p
This thread would be more interesting if this guy filled up with diesel... :p
![hammer](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bonk.gif)
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
Got to love people with poor math skills. My savings would be about $500 a year based on my consumption. Mid grade does not seem to effect the mileage of the car at least the info from the trip computers does not suggest it is suffering. Multiply that over three years and invest the proceeds and the pot continues to grow. I don't give a flying **** about my wife's 745 and though I like my C55 quite a bit, it will be discarded in a few years as well.
The original question was, will low grade damage the motor? My answer was and is no. I believe that even with prolonged use it wil not damage the motor. You do have valid points regarding efficiency and I don't blame anyone for adhering to the owners manual, but Mercedes is not a charity, they are profit motivated and there is a plethora of CYA in everything they do.
You can put rocket fuel in as far as I'm concerned. Mid grade is fine for the wife's BMW and I won't hesitate to use it in my C55.
The original question was, will low grade damage the motor? My answer was and is no. I believe that even with prolonged use it wil not damage the motor. You do have valid points regarding efficiency and I don't blame anyone for adhering to the owners manual, but Mercedes is not a charity, they are profit motivated and there is a plethora of CYA in everything they do.
You can put rocket fuel in as far as I'm concerned. Mid grade is fine for the wife's BMW and I won't hesitate to use it in my C55.
FYI mb is known to test the fuel in the fuel system if they suspect poor gas could cause an issue. If it reads anything less than 91 oct they will not pay for the claim and leave you will the bill.
I may be mocking people here but is 500 bucks a huge deal to a person who has 2 cars that are 60k+ in price? Thats what half of 1 of your monthly payment for the BMW and or MB?
It has been proven that the car makes less power on low grade gas and it dials back timing to keep the car from knocking. Im not a fan of slow AMG cars and a knocking motor leads to a blown motor.
A friend made the mistake of advancing the timing on his MB competitor and his motor exploded in royal from a while back after only 2 years of use. Sounds like the knocking motor could be an issue after a few miles.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you are going to quote scripture in your sig, it would be nice if you did not openly call people stupid. I do not believe you actually have the knowledge or experience to back up the claim that prolonged use of 89 oct will damage an AMG motor.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
My savings would be about $500 a year based on my consumption.
![woowoo](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/woowoo.gif)
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
You actually had to pay for dinner in Vegas? LOL
![woowoo](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/woowoo.gif)
The dinner was not in any casino... the food was far too gourmet to be given away for free.
Last edited by CynCarvin32; 03-29-2005 at 01:11 PM.
#33
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
are you one of those people that thinks they get free stuff when they go to vegas? let me guess you never go in the red and the casinos love to have you back day in day day out to give you free things. go down 2k at the tables and get a free 300 buck room and a few trips to the buffet-- sounds like a fun time to me!
The dinner was not in any casino... the food was far too gourmet to be given away for free.
![woowoo](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/woowoo.gif)
The dinner was not in any casino... the food was far too gourmet to be given away for free.
IMO the best restaurants in Vegas are in the Casinos. Yes I was down $300 in cash last time I was there in February, but that was the total cost of being there for three days. The time before that I left up a $1000 and stayed and ate for free. I am definetly ahead, my worst weekend I left down 3K and my best I left up 12K. It has become a cheap place for me to hang out.
You don't seem to understand the comp system, you do have to charge the meal to your room, its not free, it is only comped after the fact. And for the record I am not talking about the buffet. I'm not a high roller either, I never take more than 2500-3000 with me.
You are very amusing though.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Last edited by 05C55; 03-29-2005 at 02:21 PM.
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
You actually had to pay for dinner in Vegas? LOL
i'd like to see you walk into joe's and get comp'd.
#36
Originally Posted by schwarzwagen
so you are a woman? that explains it.
i'd like to see you walk into joe's and get comp'd.
i'd like to see you walk into joe's and get comp'd.
#37
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you would lend me your car they may take pity on me and give me a freebee. :p
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you would lend me your car they may take pity on me and give me a freebee. :p
7 series? well thats flashy but also down right fugly.
Nissan Truck? Well it does look kind of nice. Better than a ford or Ram.
#39
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
take it easy budy. i had a c32 and now have a daily driver C230k and lets say the C32 and C230k never really got a second look from many people. Its a good car but its not as flashy as you make it sound. Id say the SEL attracts more looks based on its condition and age tested class.
7 series? well thats flashy but also down right fugly.
Nissan Truck? Well it does look kind of nice. Better than a ford or Ram.
7 series? well thats flashy but also down right fugly.
Nissan Truck? Well it does look kind of nice. Better than a ford or Ram.
He's dishing it out. I agree however I do get a lot more attention with the 19"s but it still goes relatively unnoticed. My wife drives the 7, looks aside its an awesome car and unlike the Mercedes has yet to see the service drive except for a flat tire.
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
He's dishing it out. I agree however I do get a lot more attention with the 19"s but it still goes relatively unnoticed. My wife drives the 7, looks aside its an awesome car and unlike the Mercedes has yet to see the service drive except for a flat tire.
however, you disagreed (which is fine, if you have the facts), suggesting that mid-grade can be used long term and that in your experience, you have seen no ill-effects. one MUST keep in mind that you lease your cars and get rid of them before any real long term effects are made apparent. basically, you have been lucky up to this point. you sparred with improviz and lost the argument. now you are attacking my chosen mode of transport in an effort to make yourself feel better. i get that a lot, so i will not get angered. when people are on the wrong side of an argument they resort to schoolyard tactics. making fun of my sig, my car, etc.
#41
Improvis is a ****ing idiot. I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use. The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.
Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.
Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by 05C55
Improvis is a ****ing idiot. I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use. The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.
Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.
Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
#44
Originally Posted by 05C55
Improvis is a ****ing idiot.
You haven't provided any documentation to prove the nonsense you keep blathering, because none exists. And like the sneaky little weasel you are, you intentionally omitted pertinant portions of the gasoline faq to try and prove your point, only to have me slap your pompous *** down with the questions and answers from the faq you deliberately omitted.
Your parroting "it's true because I say it is!!" 50,000,000 times doesn't make it true. In your idiotic, stubborn refusal to admit the facts that have been plainly lain out before you, you have established beyond any shadow of a doubt that you know nothing about cars and care even less about them. You have not presented ONE citation from ANYWHERE which supports either of your central assertions over the course of this argument. And you can't, and you know it, because no such evidence exists.
So instead, you start trying to change the subject and obfuscate to mask the fact that you got *****-slapped.
Originally Posted by 05C55
I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use.
Originally Posted by 05C55
The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.
Which rules you out.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Originally Posted by 05C55
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car.
In the real world, they do.
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
Originally Posted by 05C55
Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
Originally Posted by 05C55
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Moron.
Last edited by Improviz; 03-31-2005 at 01:29 AM.
#45
Notice they use terms like can damage teh car and should such damage occur. They are making blanket statements. Not guaranteeing your motor will melt down. Of course I'm not a hypochondriac either so maybe your perspective is a bit different.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#46
Selective quoting and misquoting seem to be your favored ploys...
...unfortunately, people can simply read their manuals and read what Mercedes wrote.
For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):
It goes on to say:
Spin and twist all you want, dude...the fact train has left, and you missed it.
For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):
Caution!
To maintain the engine's durability and performance, premium unleaded gasoline must be used. If premium unleaded is not available and low octane fuel is used, follow these precautions:
- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,
- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,
- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,
- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.
To maintain the engine's durability and performance, premium unleaded gasoline must be used. If premium unleaded is not available and low octane fuel is used, follow these precautions:
- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,
- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,
- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,
- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by Improviz
...unfortunately, people can simply read their manuals and read what Mercedes wrote.
For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):
It goes on to say:
Spin and twist all you want, dude...the fact train has left, and you missed it.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):
It goes on to say:
Spin and twist all you want, dude...the fact train has left, and you missed it.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
that about solves that
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
#48
I'm not spinning anything. And for the record, the C-classs Manual which you refer to does not even list the C55 does it? The C-class compression ratios range from 8.7 on the C230 to 10 and 10.5 on the 320 and 240 and 11:1 on the C55. MB puts the same disclaimer on everything they produce regardless of the compression ratio.
#49
Now that I am actually reading the manual you have completely misrepresented the facts.
Quote:
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.
The above statements pertain to fuel additives, if you have in fact read it or want to look again, this is under the heading of Gasoline Additives page 435 and makes no mention of octane ratings and the term poor fuel quality is referring to the "lack of availability of gasolines which contain these additives" and the build up of carbon deposits which can lead to engine performance problems. Funny you didn't bother to mention any of this. The section on Fuel Requirements page 434 which clearly states "only use premium unleaded" makes no mention of any ramifications to the warranty or damage to the engine. Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Unbelievable.
Quote:
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.
The above statements pertain to fuel additives, if you have in fact read it or want to look again, this is under the heading of Gasoline Additives page 435 and makes no mention of octane ratings and the term poor fuel quality is referring to the "lack of availability of gasolines which contain these additives" and the build up of carbon deposits which can lead to engine performance problems. Funny you didn't bother to mention any of this. The section on Fuel Requirements page 434 which clearly states "only use premium unleaded" makes no mention of any ramifications to the warranty or damage to the engine. Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Unbelievable.
#50
![hammer](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bonk.gif)
![hammer](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bonk.gif)
![hammer](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/bonk.gif)
Originally Posted by Improviz
In a normal motor this might be true, but in a high performance motor with an 11:1 compression ratio, it is not. Mercedes specifically warns against using regular unleaded in their owners' manual, stating that using other than premium grade may cause engine damage and void the warranty.
Here's what my manual has to say (I duplicated their boldface font as well):
Caution!
To maintain the engine's durability and performance, premium unleaded gasoline must be used. If premium unleaded is not available and low octane fuel is used, follow these precautions:
- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,
- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,
- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,
- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.
It goes on to say:
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.
[/i]
Here's what my manual has to say (I duplicated their boldface font as well):
Caution!
Originally Posted by 05C55
THIS IS THE SECTION ON FUEL REQUIREMENTS, it is not in bold nor does it say caution.
- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,
- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,
- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,
- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.
It goes on to say:
Originally Posted by 05C55
THIS IS TWO SECTIONS LATER AND IS TALKING ABOUT GASOLINE ADDITIVES, SPECIFICALLY THE EXTENEDED USE OF GASOLINES WITHOUT ADDITIVES AND THE RESULTING CARBON DEPOSITS
[/i]
Last edited by 05C55; 03-31-2005 at 02:55 AM.