C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

How screwed am I

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-28-2005, 06:55 PM
  #26  
Out Of Control!!
 
vraa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 28,933
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Bro, I spend 50$ on a tank of gas @ 93 octane. And I'm thinking about moving to racing fuel!
vraa is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 07:52 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BoBcanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Toronto,ON
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by respdoc
lol..

This thread would be more interesting if this guy filled up with diesel... :p
here's a funny story, My friend back in europe rented a car and filled it up with diesel lol then what he does! HE STARTS IT UP, AND DRIVES IT TO A MECHANIC, with clouds of smoke behind it... then the mechanic took something apart not sure what, cleaned petrol pump blablabla... bottom line he returned it back working...but paid quite few extra bills
BoBcanada is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 08:48 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CynCarvin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by 05C55
Got to love people with poor math skills. My savings would be about $500 a year based on my consumption. Mid grade does not seem to effect the mileage of the car at least the info from the trip computers does not suggest it is suffering. Multiply that over three years and invest the proceeds and the pot continues to grow. I don't give a flying **** about my wife's 745 and though I like my C55 quite a bit, it will be discarded in a few years as well.

The original question was, will low grade damage the motor? My answer was and is no. I believe that even with prolonged use it wil not damage the motor. You do have valid points regarding efficiency and I don't blame anyone for adhering to the owners manual, but Mercedes is not a charity, they are profit motivated and there is a plethora of CYA in everything they do.

You can put rocket fuel in as far as I'm concerned. Mid grade is fine for the wife's BMW and I won't hesitate to use it in my C55.
Well speaking of a lack of skills i guess you missed the how to read day in school as well. the quotation from the manual was already posted above and I guess that was missed.

FYI mb is known to test the fuel in the fuel system if they suspect poor gas could cause an issue. If it reads anything less than 91 oct they will not pay for the claim and leave you will the bill.

I may be mocking people here but is 500 bucks a huge deal to a person who has 2 cars that are 60k+ in price? Thats what half of 1 of your monthly payment for the BMW and or MB?

It has been proven that the car makes less power on low grade gas and it dials back timing to keep the car from knocking. Im not a fan of slow AMG cars and a knocking motor leads to a blown motor.

A friend made the mistake of advancing the timing on his MB competitor and his motor exploded in royal from a while back after only 2 years of use. Sounds like the knocking motor could be an issue after a few miles.
CynCarvin32 is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 09:59 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you are going to quote scripture in your sig, it would be nice if you did not openly call people stupid. I do not believe you actually have the knowledge or experience to back up the claim that prolonged use of 89 oct will damage an AMG motor.
i can call people who dont bother to read the OM stupid. what kind of idiot makes a $50k+ investment in a depreciating asset and then doesnt even bother to read the OM or follow its guidelines in favor of saving a few pennies. we are talking about MERCEDES f*ing BENZ here, the engineers at mb are smarter than you or i. they would NOT specify 91+ octane if it was NOT necessary. just because you cannot here pinging does not mean that you are not damaging your engine. i suggest you roll down your windows and go find a nice long uphill tunnel, apply full throttle, and come back and tell us what you here.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-28-2005, 10:07 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
My savings would be about $500 a year based on my consumption.
i spent almost that much on dinner in vegas last weekend, and i dont even drive an AMG yet. wow.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 08:09 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by schwarzwagen
i spent almost that much on dinner in vegas last weekend, and i dont even drive an AMG yet. wow.
You actually had to pay for dinner in Vegas? LOL
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 01:08 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CynCarvin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by 05C55
You actually had to pay for dinner in Vegas? LOL
are you one of those people that thinks they get free stuff when they go to vegas? let me guess you never go in the red and the casinos love to have you back day in day day out to give you free things. go down 2k at the tables and get a free 300 buck room and a few trips to the buffet-- sounds like a fun time to me!

The dinner was not in any casino... the food was far too gourmet to be given away for free.

Last edited by CynCarvin32; 03-29-2005 at 01:11 PM.
CynCarvin32 is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 02:16 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
are you one of those people that thinks they get free stuff when they go to vegas? let me guess you never go in the red and the casinos love to have you back day in day day out to give you free things. go down 2k at the tables and get a free 300 buck room and a few trips to the buffet-- sounds like a fun time to me!

The dinner was not in any casino... the food was far too gourmet to be given away for free.

IMO the best restaurants in Vegas are in the Casinos. Yes I was down $300 in cash last time I was there in February, but that was the total cost of being there for three days. The time before that I left up a $1000 and stayed and ate for free. I am definetly ahead, my worst weekend I left down 3K and my best I left up 12K. It has become a cheap place for me to hang out.

You don't seem to understand the comp system, you do have to charge the meal to your room, its not free, it is only comped after the fact. And for the record I am not talking about the buffet. I'm not a high roller either, I never take more than 2500-3000 with me.

You are very amusing though. I'm not sure I have ever had a dinner tab that I was responsible for that was over $500.

Last edited by 05C55; 03-29-2005 at 02:21 PM.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 03:20 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
You actually had to pay for dinner in Vegas? LOL
so you are a woman? that explains it.

i'd like to see you walk into joe's and get comp'd.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 03:32 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
IMO the best restaurants in Vegas are in the Casinos.
free salisbury steak at the silverton for mr. 05c55 :p
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 03:45 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by schwarzwagen
so you are a woman? that explains it.

i'd like to see you walk into joe's and get comp'd.
If you would lend me your car they may take pity on me and give me a freebee. :p
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 04:22 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you would lend me your car they may take pity on me and give me a freebee. :p
i have received nothing but complements from some rather wealthy people regarding my w126, it has class and is in immaculate condition. every week i consider a new car to complement the w126, this week it is the 964 turbo.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-29-2005, 08:53 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CynCarvin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by 05C55
If you would lend me your car they may take pity on me and give me a freebee. :p
take it easy budy. i had a c32 and now have a daily driver C230k and lets say the C32 and C230k never really got a second look from many people. Its a good car but its not as flashy as you make it sound. Id say the SEL attracts more looks based on its condition and age tested class.

7 series? well thats flashy but also down right fugly.

Nissan Truck? Well it does look kind of nice. Better than a ford or Ram.
CynCarvin32 is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 01:37 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CynCarvin32
take it easy budy. i had a c32 and now have a daily driver C230k and lets say the C32 and C230k never really got a second look from many people. Its a good car but its not as flashy as you make it sound. Id say the SEL attracts more looks based on its condition and age tested class.

7 series? well thats flashy but also down right fugly.

Nissan Truck? Well it does look kind of nice. Better than a ford or Ram.

He's dishing it out. I agree however I do get a lot more attention with the 19"s but it still goes relatively unnoticed. My wife drives the 7, looks aside its an awesome car and unlike the Mercedes has yet to see the service drive except for a flat tire.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 01:02 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
He's dishing it out. I agree however I do get a lot more attention with the 19"s but it still goes relatively unnoticed. My wife drives the 7, looks aside its an awesome car and unlike the Mercedes has yet to see the service drive except for a flat tire.
i think we are forgetting the point of this thread. the question was will mid-grade gas hurt my car because i accidentally put some in it. the consensus was, no it will not hurt the car but you should follow the guidelines specified in the OM regarding the subject. which was: drive slowly, do not use maximum throttle, do not over rev, etc.

however, you disagreed (which is fine, if you have the facts), suggesting that mid-grade can be used long term and that in your experience, you have seen no ill-effects. one MUST keep in mind that you lease your cars and get rid of them before any real long term effects are made apparent. basically, you have been lucky up to this point. you sparred with improviz and lost the argument. now you are attacking my chosen mode of transport in an effort to make yourself feel better. i get that a lot, so i will not get angered. when people are on the wrong side of an argument they resort to schoolyard tactics. making fun of my sig, my car, etc.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 04:45 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Improvis is a ****ing idiot. I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use. The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.

The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.

Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.

Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 06:20 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Who is this retard?? I'm talking about you 05C55!
You bought a mercedes.....put good gas in it you fool.

Stiggs is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 06:32 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
schwarzwagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300SEL
Originally Posted by 05C55
Improvis is a ****ing idiot. I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use. The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.

The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car. Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.

Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants. If anything these high revving, high compression motors would let go first and I have never even heard an errant ping let alone knocking.

Geez you're not even a good internet warrior.
heck with it, you are a lost cause. 50k miles is hardly even broken in yet. try 270k miles and get back to me on how many engines you have consumed.
schwarzwagen is offline  
Old 03-30-2005, 10:46 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Originally Posted by 05C55
Improvis is a ****ing idiot.
I would argue that the fokking idiot is the moron who continues to argue a point he long ago lost.

You haven't provided any documentation to prove the nonsense you keep blathering, because none exists. And like the sneaky little weasel you are, you intentionally omitted pertinant portions of the gasoline faq to try and prove your point, only to have me slap your pompous *** down with the questions and answers from the faq you deliberately omitted.

Your parroting "it's true because I say it is!!" 50,000,000 times doesn't make it true. In your idiotic, stubborn refusal to admit the facts that have been plainly lain out before you, you have established beyond any shadow of a doubt that you know nothing about cars and care even less about them. You have not presented ONE citation from ANYWHERE which supports either of your central assertions over the course of this argument. And you can't, and you know it, because no such evidence exists.

So instead, you start trying to change the subject and obfuscate to mask the fact that you got *****-slapped.

Originally Posted by 05C55
I don't believe that even 87 would damage a motor with prolonged use.
Well, you know what, Einstein? MERCEDES BENZ DOES BELIEVE IT!! If you'd pull your arrogant head out of your *** for long enough to actually read the owners manual which came with your car, you'd see that.

Originally Posted by 05C55
The cars ECU will sense predetonation and retard the timing. You will lose some power and mileage may suffer but damaging the motor is very unlikely and neither you or improvis or anyone else has proven anything to the contrary.
I believe that quotes from the Mercedes owners' manual warning of engine damage if fuel not meeting the engine's octane requirement is used, and that they would refuse to honor the engine warranty if such damage occurs, along with quotations from the gasoline faq, and other sources, which plainly show that it can, constitute proof that any idiot could understand.

Which rules you out.

Originally Posted by 05C55
The owners manual are the the guidelines set forth by Mercedes, they are not proof that lower octane will damage the car.
Yes, folks, it's true: in idiot-land, the manufacturer plainly stating that only premium unleaded should be used, that low-octane fuel can damage the engine and that if it is accidentally put into the car protective measures should be taken, and that they will void the engine warranty as a result of any damage in such a case, does not prove that lower octane fuel will damage the car.

In the real world, they do.

Originally Posted by 05C55
Get real. I showed info that clearly stated that late model cars with advanced ECU's can easily protect the motor from predetonation. Most of the cars I have owned I have driven for 50K if they are not damaged by then I well so much for your guess work.
Yes, folks: you should ignore what those pointy-headed Mercedes engineers say and listen to 05C55, a tightass too cheap to put the proper fuel in his $100K plus worth of cars so he can save the price of a good steak dinner over the course of one year. Or, as someone pointed out, a nice, fresh cookie per tankfull. Why? Well, because 05C55 has personally taken each and every one of his cars' engines apart and inspected them for damage, obviously!

Originally Posted by 05C55
Unlike you I have personal experience with numerous high performance motors, some 100+bhp/ltr powerplants.
Yeah, sure you do....which is why you're sitting here telling us that the engineers who designed them don't know what the hell they're talking about.

Moron.

Last edited by Improviz; 03-31-2005 at 01:29 AM.
Improviz is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 12:55 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Notice they use terms like can damage teh car and should such damage occur. They are making blanket statements. Not guaranteeing your motor will melt down. Of course I'm not a hypochondriac either so maybe your perspective is a bit different.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 01:26 AM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Improviz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS55 AMG
Selective quoting and misquoting seem to be your favored ploys...

...unfortunately, people can simply read their manuals and read what Mercedes wrote.

For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):

Caution!
To maintain the engine's durability and performance, premium unleaded gasoline must be used.
If premium unleaded is not available and low octane fuel is used, follow these precautions:


- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,

- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,

- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,

- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.
It goes on to say:

Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.
Spin and twist all you want, dude...the fact train has left, and you missed it.

Improviz is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 02:03 AM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CynCarvin32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mercedes Benz
Originally Posted by Improviz
...unfortunately, people can simply read their manuals and read what Mercedes wrote.

For starters, the claim that they stated "should such damage occur" with respect to engine damage related to low octane/poor quality gasoline is a complete fabrication. Nor are they ambiguous in any way, shape, or form about what fuel should be used. You seem to have missed one very important little phrase, so I'll highlight it for you, in a bit more noticeable font: Here is what Mercedes did write, in the owners' manual (which you will find, still pristine and unreferenced, in your glove compartment):



It goes on to say:



Spin and twist all you want, dude...the fact train has left, and you missed it.

omg

that about solves that

CynCarvin32 is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 02:23 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not spinning anything. And for the record, the C-classs Manual which you refer to does not even list the C55 does it? The C-class compression ratios range from 8.7 on the C230 to 10 and 10.5 on the 320 and 240 and 11:1 on the C55. MB puts the same disclaimer on everything they produce regardless of the compression ratio.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 02:45 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that I am actually reading the manual you have completely misrepresented the facts.

Quote:
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.


The above statements pertain to fuel additives, if you have in fact read it or want to look again, this is under the heading of Gasoline Additives page 435 and makes no mention of octane ratings and the term poor fuel quality is referring to the "lack of availability of gasolines which contain these additives" and the build up of carbon deposits which can lead to engine performance problems. Funny you didn't bother to mention any of this. The section on Fuel Requirements page 434 which clearly states "only use premium unleaded" makes no mention of any ramifications to the warranty or damage to the engine. Apparently reading comprehension is not your strong suit. Unbelievable.
05C55 is offline  
Old 03-31-2005, 02:53 AM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
05C55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Improviz
In a normal motor this might be true, but in a high performance motor with an 11:1 compression ratio, it is not. Mercedes specifically warns against using regular unleaded in their owners' manual, stating that using other than premium grade may cause engine damage and void the warranty.

Here's what my manual has to say (I duplicated their boldface font as well):

Caution!
Originally Posted by 05C55
THIS IS THE SECTION ON FUEL REQUIREMENTS, it is not in bold nor does it say caution.
To maintain the engine's durability and performance, premium unleaded gasoline must be used. If premium unleaded is not available and low octane fuel is used, follow these precautions:

- have the fuel tank filled only partially with unleaded regular and fill up with premium unleaded as soon as possible,

- avoid full throttle driving and abrupt acceleration,

- do not exceed an engine speed of 3000 rpm, if the vehicle is loaded with a light load such as two persons and no luggage,

- do not exceed 2/3 of maximum accelerator pedal position, if the vehicle is fully loaded or operating in mountainous terrain.


It goes on to say:
Originally Posted by 05C55
THIS IS TWO SECTIONS LATER AND IS TALKING ABOUT GASOLINE ADDITIVES, SPECIFICALLY THE EXTENEDED USE OF GASOLINES WITHOUT ADDITIVES AND THE RESULTING CARBON DEPOSITS
Damage or malfunctions resulting from poor fuel quality or from blending specific fuel additives are not covered by the Mercedes-Benz Limited Warranty.

[/i]

Last edited by 05C55; 03-31-2005 at 02:55 AM.
05C55 is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: How screwed am I



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.