To all:
In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
Quote:
In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
I've driven the C-class on the Continental ContiSpotContact 2 at a MB driving event in July - I think the Michelins are WAY better!Originally Posted by Marktini
To all:In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
Member
Continental ContiSpotContact 2 SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! my front right one just popped on me. Ive gone into a slide at 45mph on them as well. ****ty ****ty tires.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
I have the Goodyears and love the overall performance as well as the cool-as-hell looking tread pattern Originally Posted by Marktini
To all:In the Car and Driver December 2005 issue 11 high-performance street tires, labeled "max performance" were tested along with help and support of the Tire Rack. All season tires were not included however all tires were tested in 3 dry and 3 wet tests.
The tests were conducted on-site at the Tire Racks facility and included Braking tests in the dry and wet, Autocross in the dry and wet and Skidpad in the dry and wet.
This is not intended to start any arguments or flame wars it's just here for anyone who is interested in the results.
The Yokohama tested best in the dry, and the Goodyear in the wet with the overall combined results of as follows from first (best) to last.
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3
2. Continental ContiSpotContact 2
3. Yokohama Adfvan Neova AD07
4. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
5. Hankook Ventus R-S2 Z212
6. Dunlop Sport SP Sport Maxx
7. Pirelli P Zero Rossa Asimmetrico
8. Toyo Proxes T1R
9. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
10. BFGoodrich g-Force T/A KD
11. Kumho Ecsta MX
The tires were all tested on a BMW 325i. I would consider many of the characteristics of the car similar to the C-Class.
I found the entire article to be very informative, evidently this is the first tire test conducted by C&D since 1989.
Quote:
Post some tread pics!Originally Posted by NY C32
I have the Goodyears and love the overall performance as well as the cool-as-hell looking tread pattern
Quote:
I have them on my C55. I have about 1,500 miles on them and couldn't be happier.Originally Posted by NY C32
I have the Goodyears and love the overall performance as well as the cool-as-hell looking tread pattern
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
From tirerackOriginally Posted by C43AMG
Post some tread pics!
Super Member
I am running the Advan AD07's. You just can't compare them to the Stock Conti 2's. They have much better grip, are quieter, and ride better.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Explore
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Quote:
looks kinda like the T1-SOriginally Posted by NY C32
From tirerack
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
It looks a lot like the Goodyear Eagle F1 rain tireOriginally Posted by IdriveFast
looks kinda like the T1-S
MBWorld Fanatic!
just got my new 19" shoes today w/ Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 tires on them for my C55. will post pics and feedback of tires after wheels go on. 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlee-
Continental ContiSpotContact 2 SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! my front right one just popped on me. Ive gone into a slide at 45mph on them as well. ****ty ****ty tires.
having had the Michelin PS on my car and then driving the loaners with the Conti's, the Conti's suck ***!
and I'm really liking my Toyo T-1S. Plus, no way the Hankook's can be ranked that "high"...
Senior Member
i'm with you on the tread pattern, totally bad ***. the michelins just don't look cool, and let's face it, that counts!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Continental ContiSpotContact 2 are my next tires.. I've driven on them, and I'm not sure what others don't like, but I find them over all quiet, and perform well.
Pics from tire rack.
Pics from tire rack.
the contisport 2 has a soft side wall like they stated, but they grip very well in dry. Don't forget the ranking is overall, not on dry condition along. Some of these tires don't do well in dry vise versa.
if you go into a 70-90degree corner at 45mph you either A) kiss goodbye under-steer into the curb or B) rear's gonna get lose depending on how fast you take the turn and how fast you turn the steering wheel. Law's of physics or driver error cannot be blamed on the tires.
I run on GS-D3 btw. I have used pilotsport, contisport1 and 2 and the rosso.
if you go into a 70-90degree corner at 45mph you either A) kiss goodbye under-steer into the curb or B) rear's gonna get lose depending on how fast you take the turn and how fast you turn the steering wheel. Law's of physics or driver error cannot be blamed on the tires.
I run on GS-D3 btw. I have used pilotsport, contisport1 and 2 and the rosso.
Junior Member
I got over 15,000 miles on the rears and over 20,000 on the fronts. Good all around tire. Also I am running 255 on the rear.
Out Of Control!!
Wow. I was always under the impression the PS2's were hands-down the best performing tire around. Guess I need to look into the Goodyears......
Super Member
In my experience with the Conti's they don't do any very well but they don't do anything very poorly either. If you are happy with average they are probably a good tire for you. Me? Average just does not cut it. The Advan's simply blow the Conti's away in every measure. Much better dry grip, much quieter, etc. The only place the Conti's may beat the Advans is in tread life, only time will tell.
Senior Member
Tirerack owner surveys rank them as such(Michelin/Goodyear):
Dry Traction 9.5/9.2, Wet Traction 8.7/9.1, Hydro Resistance 8.5/9.0, Conrering Stability 9.2/8.9, Steering Response 9.1/8.8, Ride Comfort 8.5/8.6, Noise Comfort 8.5/8.5 and Tread Wear 7.4/8.0.
AND
Tiretracks tests gave the following rankings(Michelin/Goodyear):
(STREET)Ride Comfort 6.39/6.48, Noise Comfort 6.35/6.41, Handling 7.48/7.45, OVerall Road 6.74/6.78
(TRACK-DRY) Cornering Stability 8.55/8.38, Steering Response 8.56/8.26, Braking Modulation 8.26/8.11, Handling Predictability 8.35/8.17, Overall Track 8.43/8.23
(TRACK-Wet) Cornering Stability 8.12/8.19, Steering Response 8.25/7.96, Braking Modulation 8.18/8.03, Handling Predictability 8.08/8.18, Overall Track 8.16/8.09
Slalom: Dry 4.13/4.20 Wet 4.42/4.39
Lap Time: Dry 29.75/29.98 Wet 30.78/30.69
Braking 50-0: 84.6/84.7
Cornering G's: Dry .95/.94 Wet .91/.92
So, what does all this indicate? Both the owners reviews and the tests indicate for a pure extreme performance dry tire the Michelin is better...for an all around performer or if you live in a rainy are, the goodyears are the bestg bet!!!
Given that i live in SoCal i will be getting the Michelins when the OE are worn out(i give them <7K miles since i have a problem not laying rubber stips 40ft long every chance i get!!).
Dry Traction 9.5/9.2, Wet Traction 8.7/9.1, Hydro Resistance 8.5/9.0, Conrering Stability 9.2/8.9, Steering Response 9.1/8.8, Ride Comfort 8.5/8.6, Noise Comfort 8.5/8.5 and Tread Wear 7.4/8.0.
AND
Tiretracks tests gave the following rankings(Michelin/Goodyear):
(STREET)Ride Comfort 6.39/6.48, Noise Comfort 6.35/6.41, Handling 7.48/7.45, OVerall Road 6.74/6.78
(TRACK-DRY) Cornering Stability 8.55/8.38, Steering Response 8.56/8.26, Braking Modulation 8.26/8.11, Handling Predictability 8.35/8.17, Overall Track 8.43/8.23
(TRACK-Wet) Cornering Stability 8.12/8.19, Steering Response 8.25/7.96, Braking Modulation 8.18/8.03, Handling Predictability 8.08/8.18, Overall Track 8.16/8.09
Slalom: Dry 4.13/4.20 Wet 4.42/4.39
Lap Time: Dry 29.75/29.98 Wet 30.78/30.69
Braking 50-0: 84.6/84.7
Cornering G's: Dry .95/.94 Wet .91/.92
So, what does all this indicate? Both the owners reviews and the tests indicate for a pure extreme performance dry tire the Michelin is better...for an all around performer or if you live in a rainy are, the goodyears are the bestg bet!!!
Given that i live in SoCal i will be getting the Michelins when the OE are worn out(i give them <7K miles since i have a problem not laying rubber stips 40ft long every chance i get!!).
MBWorld Fanatic!
I replaced stock Rosso with F225 , R255 18" PS/2 , and felt much better in sterring sharpness and responsive after ~3000km. ; surely like the PS/2 's significant reduced road noise and the 255's increased grip. Another thing is PS/2 seems to work well with C55's very stiff suspension, which there is a slight improvement in ride quality particularly there is more tire pressure.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Look at the SCCA Solo Nationals results for all the street tire classes.... Thats a MUCH better test... Its all Hankooks and Falken Azenis
Senior Member
im pretty sure all theses tire handle pretty much the same the differnece should be minimal for everyday driving... im comming to a time that i need new rear tires...
a couple tires came up in my mind,
conti sport 2, yokohama AVS sport, michelin PS2, good year eagle F1.. and after reading this maybe thinking of yokohama AD07, and BFgoodrich Gforce AT/KD
so basically im just pick form either "1,outstanding dry traction, or 2,better looking patterns, or maybe 3 treadlife" noise doesnt really bother me...
a couple tires came up in my mind,
conti sport 2, yokohama AVS sport, michelin PS2, good year eagle F1.. and after reading this maybe thinking of yokohama AD07, and BFgoodrich Gforce AT/KD
so basically im just pick form either "1,outstanding dry traction, or 2,better looking patterns, or maybe 3 treadlife" noise doesnt really bother me...
Member
The article also stated that the % difference in results within the top half of the entrys is very small...meaning...unless you drive like them it wont make that big of a difference at all...i wish they included a test of winter tires...anyone have experience with those...i was looking at Dunlops....and in regards to the OE michelins...the Primacy that they put on the c230 are way too noisy 
Out Of Control!!
Quote:
Thanks for the info, Falco. Wow, almost a push. Assuming cost is all that big of a factor, and it rains down here like 10 times/yr, guess I'm leaning back towards the PS2's.Originally Posted by Falco
Tirerack owner surveys rank them as such(Michelin/Goodyear):
Quote:
price difference would not drive me to anything other than the GS-D3. PS2 = $1000+ and GS-D3= $800Originally Posted by Scoop55
Thanks for the info, Falco. Wow, almost a push. Assuming cost is all that big of a factor, and it rains down here like 10 times/yr, guess I'm leaning back towards the PS2's.
