Need Advice on Adding More Power to HPS SC
#1401
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVE
More
![Popcorn](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/popc1.gif)
![Popcorn](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/popc1.gif)
#1402
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVE
![Popcorn](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/popc1.gif)
edit: Awesome, my reply to mr. "hidden agenda" is my 1000th post ;D.
#1403
Super Moderator Alumni
![slap](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/slap.gif)
Post #1401 sure sounds like someone with a personal stake in SI.
#1404
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVE
#1405
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 A4 S Line
Did you miss the part of this thread where Vadim and Brad owned themselves by jumping to conclusions that were incorrect regarding Mig888?
#1406
MBWorld Founder
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ones too fast according to CHP!
Blake,
I certainly would not call it an "owning" that the site owner was shown facts to support a conclusion. And upon continued investigation proactively reversed the finding and made all right. I guess you and I are different though. LOL
Thanks for being part of MY site - maybe you should remember that. The fact is that without ME and Simon you would not have this site.
This is not a public forum, but a private one that Simon and I pay the bill for each and every month.
Further if I, or anyone at evosport, were as biased as people like you claim and try to promote, we would not let ANY of these discussions continue, we would simply ban anyone who does not sell ours stuff. Ever think about that?
Thanks
Brad
I certainly would not call it an "owning" that the site owner was shown facts to support a conclusion. And upon continued investigation proactively reversed the finding and made all right. I guess you and I are different though. LOL
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
Thanks for being part of MY site - maybe you should remember that. The fact is that without ME and Simon you would not have this site.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Further if I, or anyone at evosport, were as biased as people like you claim and try to promote, we would not let ANY of these discussions continue, we would simply ban anyone who does not sell ours stuff. Ever think about that?
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Thanks
Brad
#1407
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 911 C4S
Blake,
I certainly would not call it an "owning" that the site owner was shown facts to support a conclusion. And upon continued investigation proactively reversed the finding and made all right. I guess you and I are different though. LOL
Thanks for being part of MY site - maybe you should remember that. The fact is that without ME and Simon you would not have this site.
This is not a public forum, but a private one that Simon and I pay the bill for each and every month.
Further if I, or anyone at evosport, were as biased as people like you claim and try to promote, we would not let ANY of these discussions continue, we would simply ban anyone who does not sell ours stuff. Ever think about that?
Thanks
Brad
I certainly would not call it an "owning" that the site owner was shown facts to support a conclusion. And upon continued investigation proactively reversed the finding and made all right. I guess you and I are different though. LOL
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
Thanks for being part of MY site - maybe you should remember that. The fact is that without ME and Simon you would not have this site.
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Further if I, or anyone at evosport, were as biased as people like you claim and try to promote, we would not let ANY of these discussions continue, we would simply ban anyone who does not sell ours stuff. Ever think about that?
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Thanks
Brad
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#1409
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Torrance, London, Amsterdam
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 AMG (stock right now), Beach Cruiser (debadged), Piper Cherokee 280 (too much to mention)
now attack me...
Perhaps if you didnt spend so much time posting thousands of times you could afford a 'big' C350 instead of the lil 230 engine.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#1410
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'09 A4 S Line
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#1413
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
W208 55 & R170 230
haven't been on the forum for a while.,! wow., what a funny...
story.
anyways.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, some technical question, any one know what is the voltage for the MAF before it will be picked?
![off topic](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/ot.gif)
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
anyways.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, some technical question, any one know what is the voltage for the MAF before it will be picked?
#1414
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Not trying to string this thread out on purpose
Guys, I'm trying to close this thread soon because all I'm getting now are bashings and insults instead of the advice I was getting earlier. You guys said I never listened to your advice but look at what actions I took based on the advice from the better forum members posting on this thread.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I hate to dissapoint you C32 cynics.
I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it felt smooth and powerful with instant throttle response and white knuckle acceleration like NEVER before.
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I hate to dissapoint you C32 cynics.
I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it felt smooth and powerful with instant throttle response and white knuckle acceleration like NEVER before.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![rice](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rice.gif)
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
Last edited by AMGSC; 02-14-2007 at 01:59 AM.
#1416
MBWorld Fanatic!
Guys, I'm trying to close this thread soon because all I'm getting now are bashings and insults instead of the advice I was getting earlier. You guys said I never listened to your advice but look at what actions I took based on the advice from forum members posting on this thread.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it feldt smooth and powerful.
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it feldt smooth and powerful.
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
#1417
Super Moderator Alumni
#1418
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Socal
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
06' Clk 500 Cabriolet, 01' CL 55, 00' Clk 430
I have BIG problem with these statement..............How can he claimed something that he have never test the product itself on a C55? He said that all the testing and tuning of the kit that was on my car and 3 others people cars that we know and said that everything was running perfectly but in reality when we re-dyno the car..........all the cars was running lean and not making the power until Jessie tuned it. That should tell you alot about a person of their words. Do not take anyone words for it unless there are proof. Robert, why are you still asking for more nightmare? My advice, if your engine is still in good condition, why not go with kleemann?
#1419
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
The race may have to wait a week until I get an answer from Bill and Adam about the MP122H. I guess I can always just get a machine shop referral from Jim to modify the plate to fit the MP122H since the kit now belongs to me and is out of warranty.
There's no point in putting on the HI-Flow Cats, Headers, Downpipes and maybe cams until I get the new blower possibility sorted out. Quaife is still going in next week.
#1420
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Silver 2002 C32, Silver 2006 CLK 350
#1421
MBWorld Fanatic!
![rice](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rice.gif)
I could go strap an acme rocket to my car and fly past Fernando Alanso....
#1422
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Guys, I'm trying to close this thread soon because all I'm getting now are bashings and insults instead of the advice I was getting earlier. You guys said I never listened to your advice but look at what actions I took based on the advice from the better forum members posting on this thread.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I hate to dissapoint you C32 cynics.
I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it felt smooth and powerful with instant throttle response and white knuckle acceleration like NEVER before.
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
1) I got chip tuning
2) I upgraded the intercooler pump and now the intercooler.
3) I got the colder plugs and wires.
4) I took off the 2.5" pulley.
5) I got the MeH2O.
As for the latest update before I go "Dark". My compression check was completed and according to Jim. Each cylinder tested between 195-202psi and were within 10% of each other which is ideal. So bottom line is NO ENGINE DAMAGE. I hate to dissapoint you C32 cynics.
I have this documented on my invoice as evidence in case something happens in the future. I paid $200 for this service plus another $100 for a complete racing oil and ultra high-performance filter change.
Jim test drove it and it felt smooth and powerful with instant throttle response and white knuckle acceleration like NEVER before.
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
![rice](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rice.gif)
As for going "Dark", I am going to follow-up on some encouraging information on the MP122H (High Helix) that Jim disclosed to me.
He told me that the MP122H made 75rwhp MORE than the MP112 with only 6.5psi versus 7.0 on the Corvette LS1 and LS2 engines during testing by swapping one out with the other on back-to-back runs.
He also showed me two blowers side-by-side and the physical footprint is almost identical except that it's a 1/4" longer. That's were the similariy ends. The intake port is much bigger, rotors much more twisted and the outlet port has a different more tapered shape.
All HPS needs to do is drill two new holes in plate that mounts to the outlet port of the blower and "Viola" a new more powerful kit that Jim thinks may put out an additional 50rwhp over the MP112. The reason he thinks it will not produce 75rwhp like the Vettes is because of the restrictions of the Drive-by-Wire throttles of the MBs.
I am trying to reach Adam and Bill to see if they are willing to use my car as the prototype for this RE-INTRODUCTION of the GEN II as Jim coined it. Furthermore Jim claimed that I would not need to retune the car after this blower swap.
My plan is to see if HPS is ambitious enough to pursue this MP122H route because Jim is DEFINITELY a strong advocate. If not then I'll probably just go with the Kleemann because Jim and Mike (the mechanic/technican) both said this the MP122 is just too SMALL for my 5.5 motor and putting a smaller pulley to increase boost will do no good. The TVS is no longer in the immediate plans since it has a completley differenct footprint and characteristics and would be a complete kit redesign.
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Do I have to go dig up your old post for you? where you state the MP122 was just a stepping stone for the latest rumored TVS, or whatever it's called?
That was the only true thing you've said about this blower in a long while.
Did you even know Maggie/Maggnuson was bought out by Callaway? a couple months back?
Also w/this new mp122 bogus info, I wouldn't trust this white knuckle never felt new power on your old abused engine garb... You are a salesmens dream customer constantly buying the next pitch, never doubting a word, until it's too late.
Last edited by Thericker; 02-14-2007 at 06:57 AM.
#1423
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
I'll go did up some comparitive MP112 v. MP122 dynos for you to cry over, or hopefully learn and listen to some of us that are trying to help you.![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Here's a bone stock C6 6.0 liter w/older MP112 maggie DYNO rwhp rwto...
@only 7psi on a A6 auto tranny..
![](http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n19/amylovebus/C6SuperchargedDyno.jpg)
Now here's a MP122 w/8psi of boost, Manual 6 speed, so much less drive line loss % has a perf blower Cam installed, long tube headers, hi flow-cats, custom x pipe, 100mm maf, cat-back exhaust, LPE cold air intake, same 6.0 liter engine...
Above mods alone would add 70rwhp 70rwto, easily ask any C6 Vette guy, now throw in an extra pound of boost this is at 8psi another EZ 15-20rwhp here's the MP122 dyno below...
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
Here's a bone stock C6 6.0 liter w/older MP112 maggie DYNO rwhp rwto...
@only 7psi on a A6 auto tranny..
![](http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n19/amylovebus/C6SuperchargedDyno.jpg)
Now here's a MP122 w/8psi of boost, Manual 6 speed, so much less drive line loss % has a perf blower Cam installed, long tube headers, hi flow-cats, custom x pipe, 100mm maf, cat-back exhaust, LPE cold air intake, same 6.0 liter engine...
Above mods alone would add 70rwhp 70rwto, easily ask any C6 Vette guy, now throw in an extra pound of boost this is at 8psi another EZ 15-20rwhp here's the MP122 dyno below...
Last edited by Thericker; 02-14-2007 at 07:05 AM.
#1424
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
So that's 63.4 more rwhp & 23.3 rwto
Mods..
Longtube headers w/hi flow cats & X pipe, add easy 25-30rwhp
blower Cam-----------------------------add easy 25-30 rwhp
Cat-back less than 5 rwhp
100mm maf less than 5rwhp
cold Air intake less than 5rwhp
manual 6 speed less dyno loss % compared to A6 auto 5-10%
1 more pound of boost lets say 10 rwhp just to be really fare
total-----just round it off to a really under estimated 70 rwhp 70 rwto
497.8 467.4 ---------bone stock LS2 w/ mp112
70.0+ 70.0+
-------------------
567.8rwhp 537.4rwto what the MP 112 would be w/above mods + 1 more lb of boost
Now tell me how much better the mp122 is? and why aren't they keeping it if the Vette guys are gaining 75rwhp w/it as Jim says?
Also I giantly under estimated those gains, they'd be a lot more in the real world over the mp122... mp112 makes way more torque..
Mods..
Longtube headers w/hi flow cats & X pipe, add easy 25-30rwhp
blower Cam-----------------------------add easy 25-30 rwhp
Cat-back less than 5 rwhp
100mm maf less than 5rwhp
cold Air intake less than 5rwhp
manual 6 speed less dyno loss % compared to A6 auto 5-10%
1 more pound of boost lets say 10 rwhp just to be really fare
total-----just round it off to a really under estimated 70 rwhp 70 rwto
497.8 467.4 ---------bone stock LS2 w/ mp112
70.0+ 70.0+
-------------------
567.8rwhp 537.4rwto what the MP 112 would be w/above mods + 1 more lb of boost
Now tell me how much better the mp122 is? and why aren't they keeping it if the Vette guys are gaining 75rwhp w/it as Jim says?
![Confused](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Also I giantly under estimated those gains, they'd be a lot more in the real world over the mp122... mp112 makes way more torque..
Last edited by Thericker; 02-14-2007 at 07:06 AM.
#1425
MBWorld Fanatic!
You did it again. Just when I think you can't get any worse, you outdo yourself. The offer was with you driving. You obviously can't put up.