Jlevi SW | Speed Innovations Software for ALL MERCEDES!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 0
..
I believe this dyno is the same dyno the unfortunate AMGSC dyno'd on as well, and the WHP he got from this dynapack nearly matched the WHP he obtained on dynojets and other dynos too. I too believe the dynapack and dynojet don't differ in final power readings substantially.
I agree. Dynapack vs Dynojet is a hot topic over on the Honda forums. Most people don't see much variation between the two. I would prefer the Dynapack so the tuner doesn't have to go driving the streets with my car to do part throttle tuning.
SPONSOR
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 130
From: Houston
C63S
I'm not a big fan of the Dynapack, but for tuning, it is a great Dyno. The numbers are almost always the same and it is easy to see if new mods made power or not. I would, however, use a dynojet after you get the car setup the way you want.
Look at the consistency of the Dynapack. Here is the graph of my stage I setup.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Just passing along a cool video and dyno of the latest Speed Innovation creation, a Ferrari 355.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r27J8paCzE
This was performed on a DYNOJET system and the top run file is stock. Several run files appear as Speed Innovation tuned, dyno'd, tuned some more, dyno'd etc...until reaching the final run file.
Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r27J8paCzE
This was performed on a DYNOJET system and the top run file is stock. Several run files appear as Speed Innovation tuned, dyno'd, tuned some more, dyno'd etc...until reaching the final run file.
Enjoy!
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
