Audi RS4 1/4 mile time
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06 C55
Audi RS4 1/4 mile time
Not sure if this is a repost, but i found another automotive show\mag with the same 1/4 mile time for this car.
http://www.************/car-videos/01...RS4-review.htm
http://www.************/car-videos/01...RS4-review.htm
#2
Not sure if this is a repost, but i found another automotive show\mag with the same 1/4 mile time for this car.
http://www.************/car-videos/01...RS4-review.htm
http://www.************/car-videos/01...RS4-review.htm
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Keesler AFB, Gulfport, MS
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG
0-60 is very impressive but, as mentioned the 1/4 is crap. I guess the heavy car and only 317tq show more there.
I love their navigation/stereo on that though! SC memory slot, DVD, MP3 and all the other standard goodies. Others should follow suit.
I love their navigation/stereo on that though! SC memory slot, DVD, MP3 and all the other standard goodies. Others should follow suit.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
The horspower figure of 420 is true, trust me, I've ran into two and been destroyed both times.
Also, check on the audi forum- they are running in the 12s at 110/111
Also, check on the audi forum- they are running in the 12s at 110/111
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
they run anywhere from 12.8 (best) to 13.1 on the average and trap in the 106-109 range. I have not seen anyone with a B7 RS4 hit the strip and trapped 110 or higher yet (only in the magazines). They are making the advertised 420 HP, but also weigh 3900 lbs, and with only TQ in the lo 300's.....that is no enough to get them to the 1/4 marker at fast speeds. They are pretty decent on the highway though.....from rolls, like 80 and up as the V8 and FSI helps there...
#6
they run anywhere from 12.8 (best) to 13.1 on the average and trap in the 106-109 range. I have not seen anyone with a B7 RS4 hit the strip and trapped 110 or higher yet (only in the magazines). They are making the advertised 420 HP, but also weigh 3900 lbs, and with only TQ in the lo 300's.....that is no enough to get them to the 1/4 marker at fast speeds. They are pretty decent on the highway though.....from rolls, like 80 and up as the V8 and FSI helps there...
Last edited by Improviz; 04-18-2007 at 01:16 PM.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
17 Posts
V12-Biturbo
they run anywhere from 12.8 (best) to 13.1 on the average and trap in the 106-109 range. I have not seen anyone with a B7 RS4 hit the strip and trapped 110 or higher yet (only in the magazines). They are making the advertised 420 HP, but also weigh 3900 lbs, and with only TQ in the lo 300's.....that is no enough to get them to the 1/4 marker at fast speeds. They are pretty decent on the highway though.....from rolls, like 80 and up as the V8 and FSI helps there...
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
maybe the heat (looks hot but hey its USA so always blistering) and the fact that it wasnt run in had an effect ? what preassure where the tyres at ? where the tyres scrubbed properly beig new etc.. 106 1/4 and 0-60 in 4.2 secs is bloody impressive for a normal road car.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
#10
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: dayton ohio hopefully it will be some place warm and sunny when i finish med school
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C32 AMG silver & 2003 Lancer Evolution 8 black very moded
depends on the driver too i run about the same in my EVO one of my neighbors has a blue RS4... its much better in person
#12
My two cents:
1 cent: Anything that happens in a street race has questionable validity. Unskilled drivers, imperfect situations, unknown modifications.
1 cent: Anyone who buys (or doesn't buy) an RS4 based on 1/4 mile time is better off with a GTO. The proper measure is Nurbergring lap times.
Bonus cent: AWD creates a weight penalty, so all other things being equal, the 2WD car will outrun the AWD car -- unless it's raining, and then the tide turns heavily.
1 cent: Anything that happens in a street race has questionable validity. Unskilled drivers, imperfect situations, unknown modifications.
1 cent: Anyone who buys (or doesn't buy) an RS4 based on 1/4 mile time is better off with a GTO. The proper measure is Nurbergring lap times.
Bonus cent: AWD creates a weight penalty, so all other things being equal, the 2WD car will outrun the AWD car -- unless it's raining, and then the tide turns heavily.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
cool vid... EVO IX vs RS4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT4Xl6Mhejg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GT4Xl6Mhejg
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
Last edited by ProjectC55; 04-18-2007 at 12:36 PM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS302AIkmls
And here is my friends Stage 3 S4 (which wasn't running right with Boost issues) vs another B7 RS4, with me driving. This run was done in good Ol' Jersey TPK
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...q=s4+rs4&hl=en
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#19
If they'd have come in at their originally-advertised weight, which as I recall was in the 3600-3700 pound range, it would've helped! And definitely, some of these things (at least the testers!!) seem to be down about 30-40 horseower from spec....still, it is a **** on the track from the numbers i"ve seen. Audi has definitely made huge strides with the last few iterations...now they just need to hire some better marketing people to get more brand recognition!!!
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,727
Received 559 Likes
on
369 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
If they'd have come in at their originally-advertised weight, which as I recall was in the 3600-3700 pound range, it would've helped! And definitely, some of these things (at least the testers!!) seem to be down about 30-40 horseower from spec....still, it is a **** on the track from the numbers i"ve seen. Audi has definitely made huge strides with the last few iterations...now they just need to hire some better marketing people to get more brand recognition!!!
MTM has the K540 which takes a cue from the W211 E55 with a Lysholm blower and integrated intercooler, all for a cool $20,000 on top of the car's already stupendous $70k sticker. Now we're in M5/63 territory.
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
They're sweet cars
Here's another one: E46 M3 CSL
.vs. RS4 Avant
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MW4yuOu7BkM
... most of my friends are crazy about the RS4. I like them but I'd rather have the E92 M3 or a CLK63 especially since they are not cheaper anyway.. ok especially the M3.. http://youtube.com/watch?v=UOwHOPtrLNo - I love this car.. http://www.autojunk.nl/clips/view/130287
Here's another one: E46 M3 CSL
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MW4yuOu7BkM
... most of my friends are crazy about the RS4. I like them but I'd rather have the E92 M3 or a CLK63 especially since they are not cheaper anyway.. ok especially the M3.. http://youtube.com/watch?v=UOwHOPtrLNo - I love this car.. http://www.autojunk.nl/clips/view/130287
Last edited by Holson; 04-18-2007 at 10:52 PM.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95 Audi urS6 Quattro
they run anywhere from 12.8 (best) to 13.1 on the average and trap in the 106-109 range. I have not seen anyone with a B7 RS4 hit the strip and trapped 110 or higher yet (only in the magazines). They are making the advertised 420 HP, but also weigh 3900 lbs, and with only TQ in the lo 300's.....that is no enough to get them to the 1/4 marker at fast speeds. They are pretty decent on the highway though.....from rolls, like 80 and up as the V8 and FSI helps there...
#23
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois, Indiana
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2005 C230 Sedan 6spd
New RS4 needs to loose some weight, but overall the car is hot. I love the instrument panels, very nice. As far is the price goes, $68K Humm......maybe I'll just wait for the next Skyline GT-R to arrive in 2008.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Lee, NJ and SoCal (Rancho C)
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4 Avant and BMW X5 4.4
They're sweet cars
Here's another one: E46 M3 CSL
.vs. RS4 Avant
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MW4yuOu7BkM
Here's another one: E46 M3 CSL
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=MW4yuOu7BkM
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)