A Choice, C32 or CLK500? What would you choose
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C55
A Choice, C32 or CLK500? What would you choose
understand that the CLK 500 may find a Kleeman on it someday soon....
-My challenge is that you get so much value with the C32 for 54K or so with Nav, Nappa leather etc....
-But I really love the look of the Coupe, although I'm struggling with the fact that it basically a C-Class for 60K, with a V8
Opinions welcome, Please................
btw, we all have high grade headaches on these types of decisions...so believe me I feel lucky to have this headache.
-My challenge is that you get so much value with the C32 for 54K or so with Nav, Nappa leather etc....
-But I really love the look of the Coupe, although I'm struggling with the fact that it basically a C-Class for 60K, with a V8
Opinions welcome, Please................
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
btw, we all have high grade headaches on these types of decisions...so believe me I feel lucky to have this headache.
#2
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
just look at the W209 as a E-class coupe, then you can complaint about the crappy C-class like interior. The CLK IS a market replacement for the E-coupe anyway.
My sis has a W208 and I have a C32, does that explain anything to you.
CLK is for girls...lol j/p
I would get the C32 just because it is a AMG & MB, instead of the CLK500 just being a MB.
My sis has a W208 and I have a C32, does that explain anything to you.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I would get the C32 just because it is a AMG & MB, instead of the CLK500 just being a MB.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
I was struggling with this decision many months back aswell. After studying pictures for hours upon hours of the W209 CLK, I cancelled my order for the CLK500 and ordered a C32 AMG. I got to drive a W209 CLK a few weeks ago, I just don't like the car; I don't like the handling, I don't like how it looks, I can go on. After I got to drive the W209 CLK, I finally was able to breathe a sigh of relief knowing that I made the right decision by getting a C32 AMG instead.
The W209 CLK looks like the spawn of a C230k and an Acura CL. Not that there is anything wrong with those two cars, it's just I wouldn't want to spend 60k on a car that looks nearly identical to an Acura!
The C32 AMG is a lot faster, a lot sexier, more comfortable, looks so much better, and finally; it is an AMG. The W209 CLK just has a cheap feeling and look to it.
People who I talk to tell me they would have gotten the CLK500 because it has a V8, well I tell them my puny V6 can kill their V8
. The C32 AMG will hold it's value better than the CLK500 aswell.
While you may put a Kleemann Supercharger on the CLK500, Evosport and many other companies already offer and are developing modifications for the C32 AMG.
The W209 CLK looks like the spawn of a C230k and an Acura CL. Not that there is anything wrong with those two cars, it's just I wouldn't want to spend 60k on a car that looks nearly identical to an Acura!
The C32 AMG is a lot faster, a lot sexier, more comfortable, looks so much better, and finally; it is an AMG. The W209 CLK just has a cheap feeling and look to it.
People who I talk to tell me they would have gotten the CLK500 because it has a V8, well I tell them my puny V6 can kill their V8
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
While you may put a Kleemann Supercharger on the CLK500, Evosport and many other companies already offer and are developing modifications for the C32 AMG.
#4
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
John, man. The NEW CLK does not look like the Acura CL, and it certainly will not be mistaken for a C-coupe, although C-coupe and CLK is quite similar. Heck all the MB model these days are similar.
The exterior of the CLK is still very much like the E-class.
The only thing i agree with you is that the center console of the new CLK really made it looks cheap.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The only thing i agree with you is that the center console of the new CLK really made it looks cheap.
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
The entire car doesn't look like an Acura CL, however when you look at it from the 3/4 rear view, it is nearly identical to the Acura CL. There was a thread about it in the W209 forum with comparison pictures, i'll try and find it.
The C32 AMG also looks a lot more aggressive than the W209 CLK.
The C32 AMG also looks a lot more aggressive than the W209 CLK.
Last edited by Accord; 10-04-2002 at 04:01 AM.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
Can't find the picture of the Acura CL, however when I was searching I found this...
Volvo C70:
2003 Honda Accord Coupe:
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/attachment.php?postid=103970)
I think the rear of the Accord looks more like an SL.
W209 CLK:
![](https://mbworld.org/forums/attachment.php?postid=66601)
MB Lineup:
Volvo C70:
2003 Honda Accord Coupe:
I think the rear of the Accord looks more like an SL.
W209 CLK:
MB Lineup:
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C55
Thanks for all the feedback
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I think car design has really departed from a single mfg. having it's own originality/trademark. It's sad to see such a great brand (MB) get so lost in it's design efforts.
I like the CLK and the 'look' is growing on me, in fact I saw the Brabus 6.1 and it looked ready for a fight. In the end though I agree the C32 has more going for it, and it will be a shame when MB wrecks that car and makes it look just like all the other 'fishes' in the sea.
Thanks for all the feedback, to the dealer I go to start the 'waiting process'
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Lean runner
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Thumbs up](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Wise decision & enjoy the AMG !
besides, the performance of C32 is much more better !
if you're interested in mods, the V8 is then very potential......
besides, the performance of C32 is much more better !
if you're interested in mods, the V8 is then very potential......
Last edited by Shine; 10-05-2002 at 10:52 PM.
#12
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Congrats...
John, the new accord looks more like the CL-class. and as for the C70, the rear does not look like the CLK at all.
As far as, E, CLK, SL, C, etc...they all look a like....
That's just the trend MB is going with the styling of their cars. From that rear shot of the E and the CLK, you can tell it's a sedan with it's coupe counter part.
John, the new accord looks more like the CL-class. and as for the C70, the rear does not look like the CLK at all.
As far as, E, CLK, SL, C, etc...they all look a like....
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
Originally posted by tango
dont forget that amg body kit and wheels come standard with the clk 500 so the clk500 is not just an ordinary mb, it is partially an amg as well
dont forget that amg body kit and wheels come standard with the clk 500 so the clk500 is not just an ordinary mb, it is partially an amg as well
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#14
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by tango
dont forget that amg body kit and wheels come standard with the clk 500 so the clk500 is not just an ordinary mb, it is partially an amg as well
dont forget that amg body kit and wheels come standard with the clk 500 so the clk500 is not just an ordinary mb, it is partially an amg as well
#15
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Accord
It's not an AMG without the engine
.
It's not an AMG without the engine
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#16
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FrankW
that's only true for the US market. MBUSA want to differentiate CLK320 and CLK500/430, so that people will feel better when they bought a more expensive model. lol
that's only true for the US market. MBUSA want to differentiate CLK320 and CLK500/430, so that people will feel better when they bought a more expensive model. lol
and what is ur point for bringing this up anwyays frank?
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally posted by tango
excuse me? i think that is also valid for the canadian market, clk500 comes with amg kits as standard also.
and what is ur point for bringing this up anwyays frank?
excuse me? i think that is also valid for the canadian market, clk500 comes with amg kits as standard also.
and what is ur point for bringing this up anwyays frank?
Back on topic though, the CLK500 isn't slow, it's just no hot-rod. Let me describe it to you this way. The CLK500 can have the AMG bodykit, wheels, and even interior. When you depress the throttle, you'll know it's not the "real" deal, but still a nice car. Tango, saying that it is "partially" AMG is simply for nostalgic value.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
I saw a CLK430 which had an AMG badge the other day, I laughed in disgust for 3 minutes!
You can consider the CLK500 an AMG if it was built at the AMG factory, however it was not, therefore it is not an AMG. It's like saying a CLK430 is an AMG. The CLK55 is an AMG, the CLK500 is not.
You can consider the CLK500 an AMG if it was built at the AMG factory, however it was not, therefore it is not an AMG. It's like saying a CLK430 is an AMG. The CLK55 is an AMG, the CLK500 is not.
#19
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Tango, Justin is partially correct on what i was trying to say, but my point was simply point out that what you said about the CLK500 come standard with the AMG bodykit, and rims are not correct, and it is only true in the US and Canada market. Apologies for not mentioning the Canada market, if that is what you are mad about.
Accord, I saw a C320 with AMG badge (no mods) last Saturday. He was drving pretty fast on the freeway, until i got next to him and give him a friendly nod and drove past him. I was just doing 85 mph, and he just slowed downed. My friends was laughing, but i was not.
Accord, I saw a C320 with AMG badge (no mods) last Saturday. He was drving pretty fast on the freeway, until i got next to him and give him a friendly nod and drove past him. I was just doing 85 mph, and he just slowed downed. My friends was laughing, but i was not.
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SoCal - SaMo & West SFV
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2011 C63, 2004 S500, 2013 E350, 2013 Ody Elite
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon12.gif)
I like people try to make there car look like AMG. With $12k over C320, it worth every penny!!
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Talking](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
no boys, im not mad not trying to argue, just trying to learn and get a point, isnt that what this forum is all about? discussions and learning more about mb knowledges?! thanx for the lesson boys! so for me its love not war hehehe
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Cool](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#23
I was considering the CLK500, but when I finally saw one at our local dealership the styling just didn't do it for me. I feel the C32 is a "special" car for various reasons. It's a lot of money and I wanted something distinctive that I would be proud of and enjoy, well into the future.
#25
Originally posted by Accord
You can consider the CLK500 an AMG if it was built at the AMG factory, however it was not, therefore it is not an AMG. It's like saying a CLK430 is an AMG. The CLK55 is an AMG, the CLK500 is not.
You can consider the CLK500 an AMG if it was built at the AMG factory, however it was not, therefore it is not an AMG. It's like saying a CLK430 is an AMG. The CLK55 is an AMG, the CLK500 is not.