Tire sizes for stock rims
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
Tire sizes for stock rims
Just spoke to the tire place and I told them I wanted 255's on the back and 235's on the front. He said that will work but it will throw the mileage off and the speed off by just a bit. Does this sound correct? Is this what others are using for size that bumped up a bit?
He said on the back
255-40-17
Front
235-45-17
Thanks
He said on the back
255-40-17
Front
235-45-17
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
That is correct.
if you go w/ 255/40/17 your speed will increase aprox 1mph per 30mph on your speedo. ( Speedo shows 60mph you r traveling at 62mph )
regards
Jack
if you go w/ 255/40/17 your speed will increase aprox 1mph per 30mph on your speedo. ( Speedo shows 60mph you r traveling at 62mph )
regards
Jack
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Just spoke to the tire place and I told them I wanted 255's on the back and 235's on the front. He said that will work but it will throw the mileage off and the speed off by just a bit. Does this sound correct? Is this what others are using for size that bumped up a bit?
He said on the back
255-40-17
Front
235-45-17
Thanks
He said on the back
255-40-17
Front
235-45-17
Thanks
Oh yeah, the speedo error is SOOOOOOOO small, I don't worry about it, even passing cops doing 62 in a 55 zone. Factor in a little treadwear, and your back to stock my friend.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
Craig- the theoretical diameters are 24.71 for 245/40 and 25.03 for 255/40. the reality is tires don't hold true to specs anyway plus as mr amg pointed out the wearing down of tread makes it all moot.
more grip is what you really need so compound plays a part. i think mramgs suggestion is good.
i put 1000 miles on my winters, finally had them mounted about 6 weeks back. are you driving on yours?
more grip is what you really need so compound plays a part. i think mramgs suggestion is good.
i put 1000 miles on my winters, finally had them mounted about 6 weeks back. are you driving on yours?
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
the speedo error is very small i just roughed it out by dividing 25.03 by 24.71 = 1.0129. multiply that by 60 mph gives 60.8. less than 1 mph pessimistic.
you do pick up 2 mph at redline in 5th gear tho!!!!! haha
you do pick up 2 mph at redline in 5th gear tho!!!!! haha
#6
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
I have probally put 20 or 30 miles on them. Can not bring myself to drive it in the bad weather. I do need to try it to see how they go.
Craig- the theoretical diameters are 24.71 for 245/40 and 25.03 for 255/40. the reality is tires don't hold true to specs anyway plus as mr amg pointed out the wearing down of tread makes it all moot.
more grip is what you really need so compound plays a part. i think mramgs suggestion is good.
i put 1000 miles on my winters, finally had them mounted about 6 weeks back. are you driving on yours?
more grip is what you really need so compound plays a part. i think mramgs suggestion is good.
i put 1000 miles on my winters, finally had them mounted about 6 weeks back. are you driving on yours?
#7
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
how does the math work for mileage? Would I actually be putting less miles on the car with the 255's and 235's up front or would it be more miles like the MPH.
So from what you are saying is that if my speedo reads 60 I am really doing 60.8 MPH? As the tread wears down that margin of error is reduced
So from what you are saying is that if my speedo reads 60 I am really doing 60.8 MPH? As the tread wears down that margin of error is reduced
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
how does the math work for mileage? Would I actually be putting less miles on the car with the 255's and 235's up front or would it be more miles like the MPH.
So from what you are saying is that if my speedo reads 60 I am really doing 60.8 MPH? As the tread wears down that margin of error is reduced
So from what you are saying is that if my speedo reads 60 I am really doing 60.8 MPH? As the tread wears down that margin of error is reduced
weather has been fairly warm here coastal connecticut. the thing that pisses me off in winter driving is the sand and gravel on the highways......due to the mild winter i95 is mostly free of the usual crud so i've been letting myself enjoy the c32 for commuting.
#9
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
Same here with the sand. The salt you never get totally off either. But if I was smart I would drive the car year round since I only keep them about 2 years. If I was going to keep it for 10 years then it would make sense to leave it garaged
yeah. as you see it inconsequential, slighty less registered miles as each rotation of rear tires carries you a smidgen farther on 255s. (all things being equal)
weather has been fairly warm here coastal connecticut. the thing that pisses me off in winter driving is the sand and gravel on the highways......due to the mild winter i95 is mostly free of the usual crud so i've been letting myself enjoy the c32 for commuting.
weather has been fairly warm here coastal connecticut. the thing that pisses me off in winter driving is the sand and gravel on the highways......due to the mild winter i95 is mostly free of the usual crud so i've been letting myself enjoy the c32 for commuting.
#10
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
They are not that expensive
DO IT, I did with bridgstone 050 PP's. WHAT a tire. I passed several R-tired cars at Beaverun with them.
Oh yeah, the speedo error is SOOOOOOOO small, I don't worry about it, even passing cops doing 62 in a 55 zone. Factor in a little treadwear, and your back to stock my friend.
See yeah![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
Oh yeah, the speedo error is SOOOOOOOO small, I don't worry about it, even passing cops doing 62 in a 55 zone. Factor in a little treadwear, and your back to stock my friend.
See yeah
![drive](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/driving.gif)
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MILFORD,CT
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
E36M3 race car/Ferrari F355 GTS/1973 Mini 1275GT/Fiat Abarth/ML63/SLK55
one last thing......225/45 and 255/40 are virtually identical in overall diameter.
i ran 235/45 in fronts (yoke a048) when i first started track days......the profile is kinda high. try to get a tire mounted before buying. discount tire or tire rack have accomodated me with this in past and allowed me to return tires undamaged by road contact or dismounting process.
now would be a good time to go for the 18"s tho. the best compromise looks vs handling IMO.
i ran 235/45 in fronts (yoke a048) when i first started track days......the profile is kinda high. try to get a tire mounted before buying. discount tire or tire rack have accomodated me with this in past and allowed me to return tires undamaged by road contact or dismounting process.
now would be a good time to go for the 18"s tho. the best compromise looks vs handling IMO.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
#13
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
I have been keeping an eye open for CLK or C55 wheels also
one last thing......225/45 and 255/40 are virtually identical in overall diameter.
i ran 235/45 in fronts (yoke a048) when i first started track days......the profile is kinda high. try to get a tire mounted before buying. discount tire or tire rack have accomodated me with this in past and allowed me to return tires undamaged by road contact or dismounting process.
now would be a good time to go for the 18"s tho. the best compromise looks vs handling IMO.
i ran 235/45 in fronts (yoke a048) when i first started track days......the profile is kinda high. try to get a tire mounted before buying. discount tire or tire rack have accomodated me with this in past and allowed me to return tires undamaged by road contact or dismounting process.
now would be a good time to go for the 18"s tho. the best compromise looks vs handling IMO.
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
#16
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2003 C32 AMG, 2003 E39 M5
I was going to go with the Toyo T-1 R's again but these sound more sticky. Any have experience with these two tires that can comment.
My buddy who manages a tire store can get me the T1R's in the 255's back and 235 fronts for $480 just for the tires. I will see how much he can get these others for
My buddy who manages a tire store can get me the T1R's in the 255's back and 235 fronts for $480 just for the tires. I will see how much he can get these others for