C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

EVO Sport performance headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-07-2008, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
runarpet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-55
EVO Sport performance headers

Greetings

I was looking at getting some performance headers and I found a set from http://www.evosport.com/product/proddetail.aspx?partnum=EVO.EXH.M03.H03]EVO Sport

what do you people think about it?

and what about Renntech and Kleemann ?


what about http://www.gmbhmotorsports.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_ID=25 4]Kleemann Sport Catalyst?
Old 02-07-2008, 09:15 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Kleemann
Old 02-07-2008, 09:35 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
I've been looking at headers for the C55 also and have tried to research every post here related to them. There are a few C55 owners here that have the Kleemann ones and seem to reasonably happy with them other than the ridiculous price ($3,000+)!! Apparently AMS (Abedin Motorsports) will be offering some in the near future.

As for your interest in the Kleemann Sport Cats, there was a post here not too long ago about a C55 owner that installed those along with the Kleemann headers and seemed to be impressed. I'm not sure if they replace the primary or secondary cats though?

I would love to see before and after dynos of someone that installed just headers (of any kind) on our C55s.............
Old 02-07-2008, 10:32 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
If you look in old posts you will find it. Well I have kleemann headers and there headers delete the primary cats or just install there high flow cats. I did the headers and a custom exhaust and I got 16wrhp with this setup.
Old 02-07-2008, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Originally Posted by wawy
I've been looking at headers for the C55 also and have tried to research every post here related to them. There are a few C55 owners here that have the Kleemann ones and seem to reasonably happy with them other than the ridiculous price ($3,000+)!! Apparently AMS (Abedin Motorsports) will be offering some in the near future.

As for your interest in the Kleemann Sport Cats, there was a post here not too long ago about a C55 owner that installed those along with the Kleemann headers and seemed to be impressed. I'm not sure if they replace the primary or secondary cats though?

I would love to see before and after dynos of someone that installed just headers (of any kind) on our C55s.............
You are correct Ams is coming out with some headers and should be good and most important the price is not bad at all. If the headers have the same quality as there crank pulley then its going to be a great product.
Old 02-07-2008, 11:15 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Originally Posted by c55asleep?
If you look in old posts you will find it. Well I have kleemann headers and there headers delete the primary cats or just install there high flow cats. I did the headers and a custom exhaust and I got 16wrhp with this setup.
c55asleep,

I would hope that most of your gains were from the headers?
Old 02-08-2008, 12:09 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Originally Posted by wawy
c55asleep,

I would hope that most of your gains were from the headers?
The 16rwhp consist of the headers and custom exhuast. I really don't think that an x-pipe and high flow cats give much, maybe 2-3 rwhp if that. The rest of the hp was from the headers. I did before and after dyno runs to find out if it really did something or not. Once again I don't know about the custom exhaust being a main concern.
Old 02-08-2008, 01:34 AM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
The fastest C55 in the country is running RennTech's headers and carbon fiber air boxes
Old 02-08-2008, 06:54 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
The fastest C55 in the country is running RennTech's headers and carbon fiber air boxes
Interesting... do tell what the 1/4 mi time is!
Old 02-08-2008, 07:03 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Interesting... do tell what the 1/4 mi time is!
I think the one he is refering to is on dragtimes which is running 12.2? I ran a 12.4 with the same thing the only difference is I use kleemann headers and I am using a 50 shot of nos. I would love to know the magic behind that car and the C32 that is aslo in dragtimes running 12.3 and claiming he only has 314 rwhp? Btw I dynoed 390rwhp. But hey you never know maybe they strip everything from the car LOL.

Last edited by c55asleep?; 02-08-2008 at 07:20 AM.
Old 02-08-2008, 12:43 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
dkflipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South FLA
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32 AMG
Originally Posted by c55asleep?
I think the one he is refering to is on dragtimes which is running 12.2? I ran a 12.4 with the same thing the only difference is I use kleemann headers and I am using a 50 shot of nos. I would love to know the magic behind that car and the C32 that is aslo in dragtimes running 12.3 and claiming he only has 314 rwhp? Btw I dynoed 390rwhp. But hey you never know maybe they strip everything from the car LOL.


+1
Old 02-08-2008, 02:28 PM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
runarpet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-55
So has no-one nothing to say about the EVO headers?
Old 02-08-2008, 04:32 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Originally Posted by runarpet
So has no-one nothing to say about the EVO headers?
I'm not aware of anyone that has them on their C55 sorry...
Perhaps someone in the CLK forum might be able to provide some info about the Evo V8 headers??
Old 02-08-2008, 05:34 PM
  #14  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Originally Posted by runarpet
So has no-one nothing to say about the EVO headers?
I think Tump43 somewhere in this forum said he installed evosport. I believe that there the same headers used on the E55. They are also similar to Renntech. There both direct bolt-ons.
Old 02-08-2008, 07:40 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by c55asleep?
I think the one he is refering to is on dragtimes which is running 12.2? I ran a 12.4 with the same thing the only difference is I use kleemann headers and I am using a 50 shot of nos. I would love to know the magic behind that car and the C32 that is aslo in dragtimes running 12.3 and claiming he only has 314 rwhp? Btw I dynoed 390rwhp. But hey you never know maybe they strip everything from the car LOL.
I think that 12.3 belongs to AMG-Jerry. I believe he now has the fastest 1/4 mile C32 doesn't he?
Old 02-09-2008, 12:34 AM
  #16  
SPONSOR
 
Eurocharged Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
I think that 12.3 belongs to AMG-Jerry. I believe he now has the fastest 1/4 mile C32 doesn't he?
incorrect, it belongs to fongflex, the fastest time AMG-Jerry has run has been 12.4 IIRC...

mine is a 12.6...it will soon be in the 11's for both of us...
Old 02-09-2008, 02:18 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tump43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,001
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic
I have the evosport headers and have before and after dyno's. I will be able to post them some time later today or tomorrow. Definately gained something from the headers. Uncorrected I'm at 425 hp with all mods, corrected I'm at 395 with all mods, if memory serves. We'll see later. No 1/4 mile times yet, though.

So far, will all mods, no warranty problems and no problems with the car other than with the stock battery and the UD alternator pulley the xenon lights would flicker and shut down at times. The optima battery fixed 99% of that.
Old 02-10-2008, 10:43 AM
  #18  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
Originally Posted by 1FASTC32
incorrect, it belongs to fongflex, the fastest time AMG-Jerry has run has been 12.4 IIRC...

mine is a 12.6...it will soon be in the 11's for both of us...

I spoke to Jerry and he also told me he ran a 12.4. I saw it on dragtime the run that fongflex had which was a 12.3 and saw here that he only dynoed 315rwhp and 300tq. I don't want to start no s!!t but i think it is
The only thing i can think is that his car weighs 3000 pounds. There is lots of c32's running here the same mods and almost evey single one is around the same times. The one that makes the least power is the one that runs the fastest.
Old 02-10-2008, 04:40 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Tump43,

If you could post those dynos for the EvoSport headers it would be appreciated....
Old 02-10-2008, 10:12 PM
  #20  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
runarpet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-55
Originally Posted by wawy
Tump43,

If you could post those dynos for the EvoSport headers it would be appreciated....

Old 02-11-2008, 01:11 AM
  #21  
Member
 
JToups386's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C55 AMG
Originally Posted by c55asleep?
I think the one he is refering to is on dragtimes which is running 12.2? I ran a 12.4 with the same thing the only difference is I use kleemann headers and I am using a 50 shot of nos. I would love to know the magic behind that car and the C32 that is aslo in dragtimes running 12.3 and claiming he only has 314 rwhp? Btw I dynoed 390rwhp. But hey you never know maybe they strip everything from the car LOL.
Well, unless he defies the laws of physics, there is no way he could run those times w/ that rwhp rating, unless the car is completely stripped down to the frame. It's simple math. It takes X amount of hp to run X ET, at X weight. On the dyno my C55 made 309 rwhp w/ an open element filter, and 306 rwhp w/ the K&N panel filters in place. I assure you mine will not run anywhere near a 12.40 with that power. I'm hoping to get it to the track soon to verify the numbers, but I estimate it's gonna' run low 13's, maybe a high 12.9+ in good air at best.

The exception to this rule would be if he's somehow making those numbers throughout the duration of the run --- as in he's making 300+ from 3000 rpms and carrying it throughout the pull to 6500 rpms, then "yes", he could possibly run those numbers. Remember, it's not peak hp that runs good ET's, but rather it's making high hp "under the umbrella" of the run. One of my old turbo Buicks made only 328 rwhp and weighed 3700lbs w/ me in it, but ran 11.9's at 111, because it made 300+ hp throughout the entire powerband, and had a ton of torque to get it rolling off the line.

Anyway, I'm not trying to call anyone a liar. Currently we don't have access to all the data necessary to dispute those claims, but in the end it's still simple math.
I'd love to see his dyno graphs, and also know the running weight of his car. Then it might make sense.
Old 02-11-2008, 09:53 AM
  #22  
Super Member
 
c55asleep?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bicycle
J-Toup, i agree with you. The math just does not add up, but hey you never know??? Even that C55 on dragtimes running 12.2 is a little shaddy. Guys, i don't want to come across like a jerk but come on post your real times or explain what you really have. How is it that s/c C55 runs 11.9 and with over 90hp over oem and with some headers and a tune it runs .3 slower. Once again sorry to come across so harsh but darn i hate seeing this s!!t. I know all this is off topic sorry.
Old 02-11-2008, 04:42 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tump43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,001
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic
All --

Here are my dyno's -- hard to read had to use my camera phone; Corrected and Uncorrected. Both dyno's show the best of three different runs. The first (blue) on Oct. 12, 2007, with the evosport UDP pullies and Renntech CF air box, AMS ud crank pulley & green filters; the Second (red) on Nov. 26, 2007, with the addition of the Evosport ceramic coated shorty headers; and the Third (green) on January 17, 2008 with addition of the evotech ECU tuning.

Uncorrected for atmospheric conditions Dyno, the "as she ran" shows: 1) (blue) max rwhp 308.12, max rwtq 322.35; 2) (red) max rwhp 333.38, max rwtq 348.80; and 3) (green) max rwhp 346.54, max rwtq 365.80; and

The Correcected for standardized SAE conditions Dyno shows: 1) (blue) max rwhp 303.58, max rwtq 317.60; 2) (red) max rwhp 317.89, max rwtq 332.59; and 3) (green) max rwhp 324.31, max rwtq 342.33;.

These dyno show a modest increase for each mod in sequence over the other and were each performed on the same dynojet by the same guy, at the same place, albeit on different days.

If one is to assume a 21% drivetrain loss on an unenthusiatic dyno, that translates into 419.31 max uncorrected crank hp, and 442.61 max uncorrected crank tq after all the mods.
Attached Thumbnails EVO Sport performance headers-c55dynosjan2008001.jpg   EVO Sport performance headers-c55dynosjan2008002.jpg  
Old 02-11-2008, 04:50 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Tump43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 1,001
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic
I will try to get better (legible) pictures of these dynos, but clearly, each mod adds something to the C55. Granted it's a lot of money for little gain but, I did this over time (shopping for bargins); had fun with each individual mod; and did not have to pay a dime for installation (this brings the cost down to something almost reasonable).

The mods I chose were all intended to make the car even more driveable and quicker. These have seemed to do the trick without comprimising the integrity of the original machine, or, in my case, causing any warranty problems whatever with the dealer.

Now I need more money for a set of PSS-9's and a quaife LSD. If anyone has a perfectly serviceable but used set of these items, let me know, I'm very interested.

Regards,
Old 02-11-2008, 05:05 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
suicidal4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,079
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
2001 E430
Did you guys feel the difference that headers made? My E430 is currently at the shop having my Kleemann headers, downpipes, and 200 cell cats installed. I pick it up tomorrow. I don't expect to feel much difference but friends are telling me I will.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: EVO Sport performance headers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.