C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

C63 V c32 v ISF Qtr Mile times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-08-2008, 07:04 PM
  #51  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
kindafast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
W210 E55 & W204 C63
I meant stageII
Old 06-08-2008, 07:45 PM
  #52  
Member
 
mcc3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 BMW M3 White/Black
Originally Posted by c32AMG-DTM
Well... the issue is, does the C63 really have *only* 451 hp, or is that a b.s. rating to keep the MB heirarchy in line? Since it's the exact same engine as the 505 hp 6.2 V8 found elsewhere, it's reasonable to assume 560 hp (that'd be about 465 rwhp) from ECU, airbox, and headers.

If you follow the CLK63BS sub-forum, you'll see jrcart's car, which evosport has tuned up over 500 rwhp with just ECU, slight intake mods, and long-tube headers - since it's the exact same engine, the same *should be* possible with the C63... time will tell
+1

No offense to the C32 owners but the C32 and C63 are worlds apart in every aspect. I think it is really an apples to oranges comparison. Personally, I had zero interest in the C32 when it came out, but yet here I am buying a C63. I think you will find that to be a similar case with other C63 drivers. There are alot who are defecting from other brands (BMW, Porsche, Etc.)

Personally, I am really not a huge Mercedes fan (across the board), but I did enjoy my 1992 -- 500E I owned from '92-'99.

Key is for each person to like their own cars for what they offer as a total package, not because one is slightly faster than another.
Old 06-08-2008, 07:58 PM
  #53  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Addicted2Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
I doubt that headers, a flash air box are going to give it another 109 HP? I can see a supercharger doing that and more, BUT not those above???
C63 is already underrated from factory. All 63 AMG's make close to 500hp, there really isn't a huge difference between a 500hp E63 and a "450hp" C63 in terms of power output. They say its less powerful because its an entry level AMG and shouldn't be as fast as higher-end AMG's. In reality, C63 was actually faster in the 1/4 mile in most tests.
Old 06-09-2008, 05:19 PM
  #54  
Super Member
 
Harry Madan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03' E39 M5, 10' CLS63 AMG
Originally Posted by AMGMIZ
you can't compare a stock car to a modded car.
+1
Old 06-13-2008, 05:25 PM
  #55  
Junior Member
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: jersey
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 2 feet
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
You CAN when you've sunk 65-70 into a new C63 and only 20 into an 04 C32?? Why not??? Once LET comes out with the TT C32, I think the C63, as great as it is, will be a glimmer in the rearview!! Can't take that away from a great car for even greater money $$$.
i think from a roll the isf and the c63 will make quick work of a similar timed c32. its just harder to launch those other two cars.
Old 06-13-2008, 05:29 PM
  #56  
Junior Member
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: jersey
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 2 feet
Originally Posted by TMC M5
Two huge holes in your argument....the best C32 runs are on drag radials and run by people on good tracks. If an E63 can run 11's bone stock....the C63 can run 11's bone stock. The C63 will run well into the 11's with drag radials. Before you declare victory (or an enthusiastic tie)...why don't you wait for the car to be delivered and actually run at a track ...not some magazine. Otherwise, it is apples to oranges....

Tom
also wait for the cars to be fitted with the performance pack for the 09 model year. the lsd should help getting off the line alot.
Old 06-13-2008, 05:34 PM
  #57  
Junior Member
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: jersey
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my 2 feet
Originally Posted by Newzchspy
OK, try getting a loaded one for 61K..................................Demand is a whole other issue. Show ME your contract for 61 K!!

Ever drive one!! car is a slug in my opinion. Once again, great trans, BUT engine, particularly from the dig, leaves a LOT to be desired. Would I buy one? NO!!! The almighty C63 is the current HOT car in that class (and you can get one of those for about 60K). This is without the dealer mark-up that we are seeing!! Note that I said "about" , so with TTL you're at $67,000.
Closer to $70 than $ 61!!!

Available Packages
$5,395.00
• Navigation System/Mark Levinson Premium Audio Package with Additional Options
- Navigation System/Mark Levinson Premium Audio Package
- Intuitive Parking Assist
- Headlamp Washers
- Preferred Accessory Package
- XM® Satellite Radio
- All-weather floor mats
Accessory Options $0.00
• Intuitive Parking Assist Included
• Headlamp Washers Included
• XM® Satellite Radio Included
• All-weather floor mats Included
• Trunk Mat Included
• Wheel locks Included
• Cargo Net Included
Delivery, Processing & Handling Fee†
$765.00
Total MSRP** $62,160.00
i got a ride in a isf in sweden and it was a serious mover... so i am lost to why you think its a slug.

all so people are able to buy c63's so easily is because a large number of people are waiting for the 09's to come out and order those.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: C63 V c32 v ISF Qtr Mile times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.